• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PAEHRs 在患者参与中的作用。

The Role of PAEHRs in Patient Involvement.

机构信息

International Business School, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, 551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.

Department of Computer and Information Science/Human-Centered Systems, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2018 Sep 25;42(11):210. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1070-y.

DOI:10.1007/s10916-018-1070-y
PMID:30255404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6153723/
Abstract

With increased patient access to data, healthcare services are experiencing change where patients are moving away from being mere passive actors towards becoming more active and involved participants. In this paper, we explore the role of patient accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) with respect to this increase in patient involvement. The study was performed as a case study and included nine interviews with patients and a survey that was responded to by 56 patients. Our results show that PAEHRs have a role in the enhancement of patient involvement because PAEHRs (i) foster a more balanced relationship between patients and healthcare professionals and (ii) increase access to information.

摘要

随着患者获取数据的机会增加,医疗保健服务正在发生变化,患者不再仅仅是被动的参与者,而是变得更加积极和主动。在本文中,我们探讨了患者可访问的电子健康记录(PAEHR)在增加患者参与度方面的作用。该研究采用案例研究的方法,包括对 9 名患者的访谈和对 56 名患者的调查。我们的研究结果表明,PAEHR 在增强患者参与度方面发挥了作用,因为 PAEHR(i)促进了患者和医疗保健专业人员之间更加平衡的关系,(ii)增加了信息的获取。

相似文献

1
The Role of PAEHRs in Patient Involvement.PAEHRs 在患者参与中的作用。
J Med Syst. 2018 Sep 25;42(11):210. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1070-y.
2
"Nothing About Me Without Me": An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records.“没有我参与,就没有与我相关的事”:对患者可获取的电子健康记录的解读性综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 29;17(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4446.
3
Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.患者反对使用可访问的电子健康记录的理由:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 28;23(5):e24090. doi: 10.2196/24090.
4
How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review.患者可访问的健康记录的使用如何有助于以患者为中心的护理:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e17655. doi: 10.2196/17655.
5
Timing It Right - Patients' Online Access to Their Record Notes in Sweden.把握时机——瑞典患者在线获取病历记录
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:336-340.
6
"Why Do They Need to Check Me?" Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study.“他们为什么要给我做检查?” 通过电子健康和医患关系实现患者参与:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 15;20(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8444.
7
Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey.挪威患者使用在线获取电子健康记录的情况及体验:在线调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 7;22(2):e16144. doi: 10.2196/16144.
8
Users' Experiences With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Mental and Somatic Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study.用户在精神和躯体保健中在线访问电子健康记录的体验:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e47840. doi: 10.2196/47840.
9
A Socio-Technical Analysis of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records.患者可访问电子健康记录的社会技术分析
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;244:3-7.
10
Experiences of Patients With Mental Health Issues Having Web-Based Access to Their Records: National Patient Survey.心理健康问题患者通过网络访问其记录的体验:全国患者调查。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 2;11:e48008. doi: 10.2196/48008.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences from patients in mental healthcare accessing their electronic health records: results from a cross-national survey in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.精神卫生保健患者获取电子健康记录的体验:来自爱沙尼亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的跨国调查结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05916-8.
2
The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.在医疗保健中实施联合数字标识符:快速审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 8;26:e45751. doi: 10.2196/45751.
3
Experiences of Patients With Mental Health Issues Having Web-Based Access to Their Records: National Patient Survey.心理健康问题患者通过网络访问其记录的体验:全国患者调查。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 2;11:e48008. doi: 10.2196/48008.
4
Patients' Experiences of a National Patient Portal and Its Usability: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对国家患者门户及其可用性的体验:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e45974. doi: 10.2196/45974.
5
Benefits, Problems, and Potential Improvements in a Nationwide Patient Portal: Cross-sectional Survey of Pharmacy Customers' Experiences.全国性患者门户的优势、问题及潜在改进:药剂顾客体验的横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 3;23(11):e31483. doi: 10.2196/31483.
6
Improvement and Evaluation of the TOPCOP Taxonomy of Patient Portals: Taxonomy-Evaluation-Delphi (TED) Approach.患者门户网站TOPCOP分类法的改进与评估:分类法评估德尔菲(TED)方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 5;23(10):e30701. doi: 10.2196/30701.
7
Pharmacy Customers' Experiences of Use, Usability, and Satisfaction of a Nationwide Patient Portal: Survey Study.全国患者门户的使用体验、可用性和满意度:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 16;23(7):e25368. doi: 10.2196/25368.
8
Development and Validation of a Useful Taxonomy of Patient Portals Based on Characteristics of Patient Engagement.基于患者参与特征的患者门户有用分类法的开发和验证。
Methods Inf Med. 2021 Jun;60(S 01):e44-e55. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730284. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Crossing the health IT chasm: considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care.跨越健康信息技术鸿沟:克服当前挑战并实现基于价值的医疗的考量与政策建议
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):1036-1043. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx017.
2
Biomedical informatics advancing the national health agenda: the AMIA 2015 year-in-review in clinical and consumer informatics.生物医学信息学推动国家健康议程:2015年美国医学信息学会临床与消费者信息学年评
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e185-e190. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw103.
3
Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study.癌症患者对在线获取电子病历的态度和体验:一项定性研究。
Health Informatics J. 2018 Jun;24(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1460458216658778. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods.通过开放病历让患者参与:一项采用混合方法的评估
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e010034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010034.
5
The antecedents, forms and consequences of patient involvement: A narrative review of the literature.患者参与的前因、形式和后果:文献回顾性叙述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan;53:351-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
6
Sharing Physician Notes Through an Electronic Portal is Associated With Improved Medication Adherence: Quasi-Experimental Study.通过电子门户共享医生记录与提高药物依从性相关:准实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 8;17(10):e226. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4872.
7
"Nothing About Me Without Me": An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records.“没有我参与,就没有与我相关的事”:对患者可获取的电子健康记录的解读性综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 29;17(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4446.
8
Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy.在线获取医生记录:患者对隐私的担忧。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26;15(9):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2670.
9
Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: qualitative study.通过“我的健康卫士”个人健康记录试点项目让患者全面电子访问健康记录和临床笔记的体验:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 27;15(3):e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2356.
10
The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials.电子患者门户对患者护理的影响:对照试验的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 26;14(6):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2238.