Suppr超能文献

患者反对使用可访问的电子健康记录的理由:定性研究。

Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 28;23(5):e24090. doi: 10.2196/24090.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) enable patients to access their health records through a secure connection over the internet. Although previous studies of patient experiences with this kind of service have shown that a majority of users are positive toward PAEHRs, little is known about why some patients occasionally or regularly choose not to use them. A better understanding of why patients may choose not to make use of digital health services such as PAEHRs is important for further development and implementation of services aimed at having patients participate in digital health services.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to explore patients' rationales for not embracing online access to health records.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 patients in a department of internal medicine in a Norwegian hospital in 2018-2019. Interview transcripts were subjected to thematic content analysis. In this paper, we focus on the subject of nonuse of PAEHRs.

RESULTS

We identified 8 different rationales that study participants had for not embracing PAEHRs. When patients reflected on why they might not use PAEHRs, they variously explained that they found PAEHRs unnecessary (they did not feel they were useful), impersonal (they preferred oral dialogue with their doctor or nurse over written information), incomprehensible (the records contained medical terminology and explanations that were hard to understand), misery oriented (the records solely focused on disease), fear provoking (reading the records could cause unwanted emotional reactions), energy demanding (making sense of the records added to the work of being a patient), cumbersome (especially among patients who felt they did not have the necessary digital competence), and impoverishing (they were skeptical about the digital transformation of individual and social life).

CONCLUSIONS

It is often assumed that the barriers to PAEHR use are mostly practical (such as lack of hardware and access to the internet). In this study, we showed that patients may have many other valid reasons for not wanting to adopt this kind of service. The results can help guide how PAEHRs and other digital health services are promoted and presented to patients, and they may suggest that the goal of a given new digital health service should not necessarily be full uptake by all patients. Rather, one should recognize that different patients might prefer and benefit from different kinds of "analog" and digital health services.

摘要

背景

患者可访问的电子健康记录(PAEHR)通过互联网上的安全连接使患者能够访问其健康记录。尽管先前对这种服务的患者体验的研究表明,大多数用户对 PAEHR 持积极态度,但对于为什么有些患者偶尔或经常选择不使用它们,人们知之甚少。更好地了解为什么患者可能选择不利用数字健康服务(如 PAEHR)对于进一步开发和实施旨在让患者参与数字健康服务的服务非常重要。

目的

本研究旨在探讨患者不接受在线访问健康记录的原因。

方法

2018 年至 2019 年,在挪威一家医院的内科部门对 40 名患者进行了定性访谈。对访谈记录进行了主题内容分析。在本文中,我们重点介绍不使用 PAEHR 的主题。

结果

我们确定了研究参与者不接受 PAEHR 的 8 种不同理由。当患者反思他们可能不使用 PAEHR 的原因时,他们分别解释说,他们认为 PAEHR 没有必要(他们认为没有用),缺乏人情味(他们更喜欢与医生或护士进行口头对话而不是书面信息),难以理解(记录中包含医学术语和难以理解的解释),以痛苦为导向(记录仅关注疾病),引起恐惧(阅读记录可能会引起不必要的情绪反应),需要精力(理解记录增加了作为患者的工作),繁琐(尤其是那些认为自己没有必要数字能力的患者),以及贫困(他们对个人和社会生活的数字化转型持怀疑态度)。

结论

人们通常认为 PAEHR 使用的障碍主要是实际的(例如缺乏硬件和访问互联网)。在这项研究中,我们表明,患者可能有许多其他合理的理由不希望采用这种服务。研究结果可以帮助指导如何向患者推广和介绍 PAEHR 和其他数字健康服务,并且可能表明给定新数字健康服务的目标不一定是所有患者都完全接受。相反,人们应该认识到,不同的患者可能更喜欢并受益于不同类型的“模拟”和数字健康服务。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
The complexity of shaping self-management in daily practice.日常实践中自我管理模式的复杂性。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):952-960. doi: 10.1111/hex.12536. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验