Nutrition Program, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Feeding Bliss ℅ Thrive Therapy, 3420 E. Shea Blvd. Unit 188, Phoenix, AZ, 85028, USA.
Nutr J. 2018 Sep 28;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0399-x.
The Healthy Eating Index-2010 is a measure of diet quality as portrayed by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans; however, computing the Healthy Eating Index score is time consuming and requires trained personnel. The Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants [shortened version] is a simple measure that quickly, in less than 10 min, assesses diet quality in a clinical or research setting. This research evaluated the degree of correlation between these two methods of scoring diet quality, as well as between these methods and other indicators of diet quality, including the nutrient density of the diet, the dietary potential renal acid load, urine pH, and plasma vitamin C concentrations. The research design was a secondary data analysis, and participants were healthy adults (n = 81) self-classified as omnivorous, vegetarian, or vegan. Confounding variables were identified and controlled using partial correlations. The two methods of scoring diet quality were significantly correlated (r = 0.227, p = 0.047). Both the Healthy Eating Index and the Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants scoring methods were correlated to nutrient density of the diets (r = 0.474 and r = 0.472 respectively, p < 0.001) as well as to the dietary potential renal acid load and urinary pH (r ranging from 0.304-0.341, p ≤ 0.002). The Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants, but not the Healthy Eating Index, was significantly correlated to plasma vitamin C concentrations (r = 0.500, p < 0.001 and 0.192, p = 0.095 respectively). These results in combination with ease of use and low cost suggest that the Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants measure is a useful tool for assessing diet quality.
《2010 健康饮食指数》是对《美国人膳食指南》中所描述的饮食质量的衡量标准;然而,计算健康饮食指数得分既耗时又需要经过培训的人员。《参与者快速饮食评估》(简化版)是一种简单的方法,可以在不到 10 分钟的时间内快速评估临床或研究环境中的饮食质量。本研究评估了这两种饮食质量评分方法之间以及这些方法与其他饮食质量指标(包括饮食营养素密度、饮食潜在肾酸负荷、尿液 pH 值和血浆维生素 C 浓度)之间的相关性程度。该研究设计为二次数据分析,参与者为健康成年人(n=81),自我分类为杂食者、素食者或严格素食者。使用偏相关识别和控制混杂变量。两种饮食质量评分方法之间存在显著相关性(r=0.227,p=0.047)。健康饮食指数和参与者快速饮食评估的评分方法都与饮食营养素密度呈正相关(r 值分别为 0.474 和 0.472,p<0.001),与饮食潜在肾酸负荷和尿 pH 值也呈正相关(r 值范围为 0.304-0.341,p≤0.002)。参与者快速饮食评估与血浆维生素 C 浓度显著相关(r 值分别为 0.500,p<0.001 和 0.192,p=0.095),而健康饮食指数则没有显著相关性。这些结果结合使用方便和成本低的优点表明,参与者快速饮食评估是评估饮食质量的有用工具。