• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹淋巴结清扫术治疗胆道肿瘤的围手术期和长期疗效:基于倾向评分匹配的病例对照分析。

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Lymphadenectomy for Biliary Tumors: A Propensity-Score-Based, Case-Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):564-575. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6811-0. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-018-6811-0
PMID:30276646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare patients undergoing MILS and open liver resections with associated lymphadenectomy for biliary tumors (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer) in a case-matched analysis using propensity scores.

METHODS

A total of 104 consecutive patients underwent liver resection with associated locoregional lymphadenectomy by laparoscopic approach constituted the study group (MILS group). The MILS group was matched in a ratio of 1:2 with patients who had undergone open resection for primary biliary cancers (Open group). Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated and compared, with specific focus on specific details of lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic series resulted in a statistically significant lower blood loss (200 vs. 350, p = 0.03), minor intraoperative blood transfusions (3.2% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.04), and postoperative blood transfusions (10.5% vs. 15.8%), other than shorter length of stay (4 vs. 6 days, p = 0.04). Number of retrieved nodes was 8 versus 7 (p = not significant); particularly, percentage of patients who achieved the recommended AJCC cutoff of six lymph nodes harvested were 93.7% versus 85.8% (p = 0.05). Both overall and lymphadenectomy-related morbidity (bleeding, pancreatitis, lymphatic fistula, vascular, and biliary injuries) were lower in MILS group (respectively 16.3% and 3.2% vs. 22.1% and 5.3%, p = 0.03). Median disease-free survival was 33 versus 36 months and disease recurrence occurred in 45.3% versus 55.3% of patients in MILS and Open groups respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic approach for lymphadenectomy is a valid option in patients with biliary cancers, because it allows to maintain the advantages of minimally invasive approach, without compromising the accuracy and the outcomes of nodal dissection.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配分析比较接受 MILS 和开腹肝切除术联合局部淋巴结清扫治疗胆道肿瘤(肝内胆管细胞癌和胆囊癌)的患者。

方法

共 104 例连续接受腹腔镜下肝切除术联合局部淋巴结清扫术的患者为研究组(MILS 组)。MILS 组与接受原发性胆道癌开腹切除术的患者按 1:2 比例匹配(开腹组)。评估和比较短期和长期结果,并特别关注淋巴结清扫的具体细节。

结果

腹腔镜组的出血量(200 比 350,p=0.03)、术中少量输血(3.2%比 7.9%,p=0.04)和术后输血(10.5%比 15.8%)明显低于开腹组,住院时间也更短(4 比 6 天,p=0.04)。淋巴结检出数为 8 比 7(p=无显著性);特别是,达到 AJCC 推荐的 6 个淋巴结检出数的患者比例分别为 93.7%比 85.8%(p=0.05)。MILS 组的总体和淋巴结清扫相关并发症(出血、胰腺炎、淋巴瘘、血管和胆道损伤)发生率较低(分别为 16.3%和 3.2%比 22.1%和 5.3%,p=0.03)。MILS 和开腹组的无病生存中位数分别为 33 个月和 36 个月,疾病复发率分别为 45.3%和 55.3%。

结论

腹腔镜淋巴结清扫术是胆道癌患者的一种有效选择,因为它可以保持微创方法的优势,而不会影响淋巴结清扫的准确性和结果。

相似文献

1
Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Lymphadenectomy for Biliary Tumors: A Propensity-Score-Based, Case-Matched Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹淋巴结清扫术治疗胆道肿瘤的围手术期和长期疗效:基于倾向评分匹配的病例对照分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):564-575. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6811-0. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution.腹腔镜肝切除联合淋巴结清扫治疗肝内胆管癌的安全性和可行性:来自单一机构的倾向评分匹配病例分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1999-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4430-4. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
IRON: A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer.IRON:胆囊癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术及开腹手术的回顾性国际多中心研究。
Surgery. 2024 Oct;176(4):1008-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.045. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):1028-1035. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2107.
5
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
[Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜与开放远端胃癌根治术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 May;19(5):530-4.
7
Technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection: an IgoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry-based study.腹腔镜孤立尾状叶切除术的技术可行性和短期结果:一项基于 IgoMILS(意大利微创肝外科组)登记研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1490-1499. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08434-w. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Appraisal of disease-specific benefits of minimally invasiveness in surgery of breast cancer liver metastases.评估乳腺癌肝转移手术微创治疗的疾病特异性获益。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(7):1169-1176. doi: 10.1002/jso.25702. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Severity of complications and long-term survival after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched, case-control study.腹腔镜全胃切除术联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的并发症严重程度和长期生存:倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.034. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
10
SURVIVAL AND PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY OF TOTALLY LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN GASTRECTOMY FOR EARLY GASTRIC CANCER: ANALYSIS FROM A SINGLE LATIN AMERICAN CENTRE.早期胃癌全腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术的生存率及围手术期发病率:来自拉丁美洲单一中心的分析
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019 Jan 7;32(1):e1413. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1413.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive liver surgery for perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.肝门部及肝内胆管癌的微创肝脏手术:比较研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11900-4.
2
From open to minimally invasive: evolving surgical approach for incidental gallbladder cancer (with video).从开放手术到微创手术:偶然发现的胆囊癌手术方式的演变(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12126-0.
3
Laparoscopic versus open surgery in treating patients with gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗胆囊癌患者的系统评价和Meta分析
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Jun 1;13(3):444-459. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-597. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
4
Augmented reality improving intraoperative navigation in minimally invasive liver surgery: an interplay between 3D reconstruction and indocyanine green.增强现实技术提高微创肝手术中的术中导航:三维重建与吲哚菁绿的相互作用。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2701-2708. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01857-9. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Approach and Oncologic Benefit in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) With Risk of Very Early Recurrence: Is it Time to Consider Technique as a Key Element of Onco-Surgical Strategy?ASO作者反思:针对具有极早期复发风险的肝内胆管癌(iCCA)的微创方法及肿瘤学获益:是时候将技术视为肿瘤外科策略的关键要素了吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2602-2603. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14972-z. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
Minimally Invasive Approach Provides Oncological Benefit in Patients with High Risk of Very Early Recurrence (VER) After Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).微创方法为术后极早期复发 (VER) 高危的肝内胆管癌 (iCCA) 患者提供了肿瘤学获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2557-2567. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14807-3. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
7
Risk factor analysis of conversion in laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌中转开腹的危险因素分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1191-1199. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10579-9. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b-5 bi-segmentectomy in patients with gallbladder cancer.腹腔镜与开腹 Sg4b-5 双段切除术治疗胆囊癌的逆概率治疗加权分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1471-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01599-0. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
9
Ten years of Italian mini-invasiveness: the I Go MILS registry as a tool of dissemination, characterization and networking.十年的意大利微创探索:I Go MILS 登记作为传播、特征和网络构建的工具。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1457-1469. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01597-2. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
10
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肝门部胆管癌:短期结局的多中心倾向评分分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 3;23(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9.