• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹 Sg4b-5 双段切除术治疗胆囊癌的逆概率治疗加权分析。

Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b-5 bi-segmentectomy in patients with gallbladder cancer.

机构信息

Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.

Clinical Trial Unit, Medical Direction of Hospital, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1471-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01599-0. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-023-01599-0
PMID:37495871
Abstract

Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy with regional lymphadenectomy (Sg4b5) is a surgical option for gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment. The laparoscopic approach to this challenging operation is still controversial. Aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b5 in a single institution series of patients. All consecutive patients who underwent Sg4b5 for GBC from January 2000 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed. 75 patients were analyzed, 18 in the laparoscopic and 57 in the open group. After IPTW, laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly decreased median intraoperative blood loss (100 vs 237.09 ml, p = 0.001), shorter median length of hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p = < 0.001) and a higher median number of harvested nodes (9 vs 7, p = 0.026). Operation time was shorter in the open group (355 vs 259 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found regarding clear resection margins, overall and major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) morbidity, bile leakage rate, 90 days post-operative mortality, overall and disease-free survival. Laparoscopic Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy and regional lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe with long term outcome comparable to open approach at least in early stages. Laparoscopic approach confirms its well-known short-term benefits with less intraoperative bleeding and shorter length of stay. Moreover, it might allow a better lymphadenectomy.

摘要

Sg4b-5 解剖性双节段切除术联合区域淋巴结清扫术(Sg4b5)是治疗胆囊癌(GBC)的一种手术选择。对于这种具有挑战性的手术,腹腔镜方法仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是比较单中心系列患者中腹腔镜与开腹 Sg4b5 的短期和长期结果。回顾性分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间因 GBC 行 Sg4b5 的所有连续患者。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)分析。共分析了 75 例患者,其中腹腔镜组 18 例,开腹组 57 例。经 IPTW 后,腹腔镜组术中出血量明显减少(100 比 237.09ml,p=0.001),中位住院时间更短(4 比 8 天,p<0.001),中位淋巴结清扫数更多(9 比 7,p=0.026)。开放组的手术时间更短(355 比 259 分钟,p<0.001)。两组在切缘是否清晰、总并发症发生率和主要并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo≥3)、胆漏率、90 天术后死亡率、总生存率和无病生存率方面无显著差异。腹腔镜 Sg4b-5 解剖性双节段切除术和区域淋巴结清扫术是可行和安全的,至少在早期与开腹手术的长期结果相当。腹腔镜方法证实了其众所周知的短期优势,术中出血量少,住院时间短。此外,它可能允许更好的淋巴结清扫。

相似文献

1
Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b-5 bi-segmentectomy in patients with gallbladder cancer.腹腔镜与开腹 Sg4b-5 双段切除术治疗胆囊癌的逆概率治疗加权分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1471-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01599-0. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Gallbladder Cancer.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗胆囊癌的对比研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Aug;32(8):854-859. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0670. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Laparoscopy versus open left lateral segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.腹腔镜手术与开腹左外侧肝段切除术治疗复发性化脓性胆管炎的对比
Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1232-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8184-7. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
4
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy approach of a radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study.腹腔镜与开腹手术行胆囊癌根治术的疗效比较:一项回顾性对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2926-2938. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07075-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Laparoscopy Versus Open Reoperation for Incidental Gallbladder Carcinoma After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后意外胆囊癌的腹腔镜手术与开放再次手术对比
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):764-768. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0802. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
[Analysis for the short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis of laparoscopic and laparotomy radical resection for gallbladder cancer].[腹腔镜与开腹胆囊癌根治性切除术的短期疗效及长期预后分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 1;60(2):140-147. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210226-00099.
7
Propensity Score Analysis of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic or Open Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer in T2 and T3 Stages.T2 和 T3 期胆囊癌腹腔镜与开腹根治术后结局的倾向评分分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1416-1424. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05288-y. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
8
Laparoscopic versus open extended cholecystectomy with bi-segmentectomy (s4b and s5) in patients with gallbladder cancer.腹腔镜与开放扩大胆囊切除术联合(S4b和S5)肝段切除术治疗胆囊癌患者的比较
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;17(1):21-27. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_98_19.
9
Oncologic safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy in pT2 gallbladder cancer: A propensity score matching analysis compared to open approach.pT2期胆囊癌腹腔镜根治性胆囊切除术的肿瘤学安全性:与开放手术对比的倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20039. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020039.
10
Comparison of oncological outcomes after open and laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer.开腹与腹腔镜再次手术治疗意外胆囊癌的肿瘤学结局比较。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):289-300. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11379. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma.胆囊癌诊断与治疗的新趋势
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;16(1):13-29. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.13.

本文引用的文献

1
Propensity Score Analysis of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic or Open Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer in T2 and T3 Stages.T2 和 T3 期胆囊癌腹腔镜与开腹根治术后结局的倾向评分分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1416-1424. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05288-y. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Gallbladder Cancer.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗胆囊癌的对比研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Aug;32(8):854-859. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0670. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
肝胆肿瘤,2.2021 年版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 May 1;19(5):541-565. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0022.
4
The role of laparoscopic surgery in the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术在胆囊癌外科治疗中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Dec;44(12):1493-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of patients with chronic pancreatitis: Amatched case-control study.慢性胰腺炎患者的腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗:一项配对病例对照研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;18(2):191-196. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_183_20.
6
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: The 3rd English edition.2019 年胆道肿瘤管理临床实践指南:第 3 版英文版。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Jan;28(1):26-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.870. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
7
Long-term survival following minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A 7-year experience from the National Cancer Database.微创扩大胆囊切除术治疗胆囊癌后的长期生存:来自国家癌症数据库的7年经验
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;122(4):707-715. doi: 10.1002/jso.26062. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Oncologic safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy in pT2 gallbladder cancer: A propensity score matching analysis compared to open approach.pT2期胆囊癌腹腔镜根治性胆囊切除术的肿瘤学安全性:与开放手术对比的倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20039. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020039.
9
Laparoscopic surgery for early gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期胆囊癌的腹腔镜手术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 26;8(6):1074-1086. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074.
10
The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update.第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会肝胆管癌分期:回顾与更新。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 May 1;145(5):543-553. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0032-RA.