Suppr超能文献

基于光学相干断层扫描血管造影图像得出的黄斑无血管区测量指标的变异性

Variability of Foveal Avascular Zone Metrics Derived From Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images.

作者信息

Linderman Rachel E, Muthiah Manickam N, Omoba Sarah B, Litts Katie, Tarima Sergey, Visotcky Alexis, Kim Judy E, Carroll Joseph

机构信息

Cell Biology, Neurobiology, & Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Oct 1;7(5):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.20. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To characterize sources of inter- and intrasubject variability in quantitative foveal avascular zone (FAZ) metrics.

METHODS

Two 3×3-mm optical coherence tomography angiography scans (centered on the fovea) were acquired in both eyes of 175 subjects. An image of the superficial plexus was extracted from each scan and segmented twice by a single observer. Four quantitative FAZ morphology metrics (area, axis ratio, acircularity, major horizontal axis angle) were calculated, and a variance components analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) age was 27.9 ± 11.9 years, and 55% were female. Area had the largest amount of variance resulting from intersubject differences (93.1%). In contrast, there was large interocular variance for axis ratio, acircularity, and major horizontal axis angle (55.0%, 53.7%, 70.7%, respectively), though only axis ratio showed significant asymmetry between fellow eyes ( < 0.05). Neither repeated images from the same eye nor repeated segmentation on the same image were significant sources of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Metrics of FAZ morphology show excellent repeatability and reliability. Excluding FAZ area, there was a high amount of variance attributed to interocular differences for the other FAZ metrics; therefore, the fellow eye should not be considered a control for FAZ studies when using these metrics.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Vision scientists must be prudent when choosing FAZ metrics, as they display varying degrees of within-subject differences relative to between-subject differences. It seems likely that different metrics will be best suited for different tasks, such as monitoring small changes over time within a single subject or assessing whether a given FAZ is abnormal.

摘要

目的

描述定量黄斑无血管区(FAZ)指标中受试者间和受试者内变异性的来源。

方法

对175名受试者的双眼进行两次3×3毫米的光学相干断层扫描血管造影(以黄斑为中心)。从每次扫描中提取浅表血管丛图像,并由一名观察者进行两次分割。计算四个定量FAZ形态指标(面积、轴比、非圆度、水平主轴角度),并进行方差成分分析。

结果

平均(±标准差)年龄为27.9±11.9岁,55%为女性。面积因受试者间差异导致的方差最大(93.1%)。相比之下,轴比、非圆度和水平主轴角度的双眼间方差较大(分别为55.0%、53.7%、70.7%),尽管只有轴比在双眼之间显示出显著不对称(<0.05)。同一只眼睛的重复图像或同一图像的重复分割均不是显著的方差来源。

结论

FAZ形态指标具有出色的可重复性和可靠性。除FAZ面积外,其他FAZ指标的双眼间差异导致的方差较高;因此,在使用这些指标进行FAZ研究时,不应将对侧眼视为对照。

转化相关性

视觉科学家在选择FAZ指标时必须谨慎,因为它们相对于受试者间差异显示出不同程度的受试者内差异。不同的指标可能最适合不同的任务,例如监测单个受试者随时间的微小变化或评估给定的FAZ是否异常。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa3/6166903/535ce4e4e3e1/i2164-2591-7-5-20-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验