Weber Jeannette, de Lange Annet, Müller Andreas
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Human Resource Management, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Feb;52(Suppl 1):32-39. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1453-1. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
An increasing number of persons continue to work after retirement age. This decision is often different between men and women as well as working histories, sectors and hierarchical positions; however, whether gender differences in working conditions and occupational well-being also exist in paid employment after retirement (PEAR) has not yet been investigated.
This study aimed to examine gender differences in working conditions and well-being of workers in PEAR.
In this study 784 employees (23.5% female) aged 65 years and older who were contracted by a Dutch temporary employment agency, participated in the baseline survey in 2011. Furthermore, a panel of 228 employees (25.9% female) participated again during a second wave in 2012. Job demands, job control, emotional exhaustion and job engagement were assessed at both time points by validated self-reporting measures.
Female employees worked fewer years in paid employment before 65 years of age, were more likely to be single, divorced or widowed, had a smaller income and worked less hours during PEAR than men. In the baseline analysis, females reported less job control and higher job stress than men. No gender differences were found on emotional exhaustion, engagement or job demands. Over the study period emotional exhaustion only increased in females. The longitudinal trend of job demands, control and engagement did not significantly differ between both sexes.
The results suggest that working conditions of PEAR are less favorable for women than for men. Furthermore, the longitudinal trend of emotional exhaustion seems to be more disadvantageous for women.
越来越多的人在退休年龄后仍继续工作。这一决定在男性和女性之间以及工作经历、行业和层级职位方面往往存在差异;然而,退休后有偿就业(PEAR)中工作条件和职业幸福感的性别差异是否存在尚未得到研究。
本研究旨在探讨退休后有偿就业工人的工作条件和幸福感中的性别差异。
在本研究中,784名65岁及以上受荷兰一家临时就业机构雇佣的员工参与了2011年的基线调查。此外,228名员工(25.9%为女性)组成的一个小组在2012年的第二轮调查中再次参与。在两个时间点通过经过验证的自我报告测量方法评估工作要求、工作控制、情感耗竭和工作投入。
女性员工在65岁之前从事有偿工作的年限较短,更有可能单身、离婚或丧偶,收入较低,在退休后有偿就业期间的工作时长比男性少。在基线分析中,女性报告的工作控制较少,工作压力比男性高。在情感耗竭、工作投入或工作要求方面未发现性别差异。在研究期间,情感耗竭仅在女性中有所增加。工作要求、控制和投入的纵向趋势在两性之间没有显著差异。
结果表明,退休后有偿就业的工作条件对女性不如对男性有利。此外,情感耗竭的纵向趋势似乎对女性更为不利。