Centre for Sport Science and University Sports, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0203832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203832. eCollection 2018.
The present study was designed to investigate the influence of two distinct small-sided game (SSG) regimes on physiological, perceptual, and technical parameters in male elite lacrosse players.
Data were collected in twelve elite male Austrian lacrosse players (25.8 ± 5.5 years; 80.1 ± 7.7 kg; 178.5 ± 6.2 cm). Players' were assigned to an intermittent (SSG-I) or a continuous (SSG-C) SSG regime, respectively. Regimes were equated for total practice time, but not active playing time. SSG data from eight sessions of 3 vs. 3 self-regulated match-play were collected along a 4-week pre-season period. Players' YoYo-Level 1 (YYL1) performance before and after the training intervention was recorded. Further, heart-rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES), and technical actions during and after SSG sessions were analyzed.
Both SSG regimes showed improvement with medium to very large effect sizes (ES) in YYL1 total distance covered pre- to post-intervention (SSG-C mean-difference ± SD: 840 ± 299 m; p = 0.003; d = 1.08; CI = 0.60 to 1.56 and SSG-I: 607 ± 274 m; p = 0.003; d = 1.25; CI = 0.66 to 1.85 respectively). Higher %HRmax values with very large ES (92 ± 0.6%; p = 0.002; d = 5.33; CI = 2.78 to 7.88) and time spent in HR zone 4 (1248.0 ± 122.7 s; p = 0.000; d = 3.43; CI = 2.31 to 4.55) were observed for SSG-C. No differences between regimes were found for any of the assessed technical actions, global RPE, and PACES scores.
Both SSG regimes investigated in this study were effective in improving YYL1 performance. Further, findings indicate that the regime does not influence players' subjective feelings and technical actions in SSG play. However, SSG-I in lacrosse specific training could have additional benefits such as lower signs of fatigue. Further, breaks can be used to give technical and tactical inputs by coaches.
本研究旨在探讨两种不同的小场地比赛（SSG）模式对男性精英长曲棍球运动员的生理、感知和技术参数的影响。
数据采集自 12 名奥地利精英男性长曲棍球运动员（25.8 ± 5.5 岁；80.1 ± 7.7kg；178.5 ± 6.2cm）。运动员分别被分配到间歇性（SSG-I）或连续性（SSG-C）SSG 模式。两种模式的总练习时间相等，但活跃的比赛时间不等。在 4 周的赛季前期间，从 8 个 3 对 3 自我监管的比赛中收集了 SSG 数据。在训练干预前后记录了运动员的 YoYo-Level 1（YYL1）表现。此外，还分析了 SSG 期间和之后的心率（HR）、感知运动强度（RPE）、身体活动愉悦感量表（PACES）和技术动作。
两种 SSG 模式在 YYL1 总距离方面都有中等至非常大的效果量（ES）的提高（SSG-C 平均差异±SD：840±299m；p=0.003；d=1.08；CI=0.60 至 1.56，SSG-I：607±274m；p=0.003；d=1.25；CI=0.66 至 1.85）。SSG-C 中 HR 最大值的百分比更高（92±0.6%；p=0.002；d=5.33；CI=2.78 至 7.88），HR 区 4 的时间更长（1248.0±122.7s；p=0.000；d=3.43；CI=2.31 至 4.55）。对于任何评估的技术动作、总体 RPE 和 PACES 得分，两种模式之间均无差异。
本研究中调查的两种 SSG 模式都能有效提高 YYL1 表现。此外，研究结果表明，模式不会影响球员在 SSG 比赛中的主观感受和技术动作。然而，在特定于长曲棍球的训练中，SSG-I 可能具有额外的益处，例如疲劳迹象更低。此外，教练可以利用休息时间提供技术和战术指导。
