Saul B. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Einstein Aging Study, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(1):347-357. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180604.
Identifying preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an important step toward developing approaches to early treatment and dementia prevention. We applied latent class analysis (LCA) to 10 baseline neuropsychological assessments for 1,345 participants from Einstein Aging Study. Time-to-event models for all-cause dementia and AD were run examining events in 4-year intervals. Five classes were identified: Mixed-Domain Impairment (n = 107), Memory-Specific Impairment (n = 457), Average (n = 539), Frontal Impairment (n = 118), and Superior Cognition (n = 124). Compared to the Average class, the Mixed-Domain Impairment and Memory-Specific Impairment classes were at higher risk of incident all-cause dementia and AD in the first 4 years from baseline, while the Frontal Impairment class was associated with higher risk between 4 and 8 years of follow-up. LCA identified classes which differ in cross-sectional cognitive patterns and in risk of dementia over specific follow-up intervals.
识别临床前阿尔茨海默病(AD)是开发早期治疗和预防痴呆方法的重要步骤。我们对来自爱因斯坦老化研究的 1345 名参与者的 10 项基线神经心理学评估应用潜在类别分析(LCA)。使用全因痴呆和 AD 的时间事件模型,以 4 年为间隔检查事件。确定了五个类别:混合域损伤(n = 107),记忆特异性损伤(n = 457),平均(n = 539),额叶损伤(n = 118)和卓越认知(n = 124)。与平均类别相比,混合域损伤和记忆特异性损伤类别的个体在基线后的前 4 年发生全因痴呆和 AD 的风险更高,而额叶损伤类别的个体在随访的 4 到 8 年内的风险更高。LCA 确定了在特定随访间隔内具有不同的横向认知模式和痴呆风险的类别。