Suppr超能文献

特定类别人群的全因痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的发病率:一种潜在类别分析方法。

Class-Specific Incidence of All-Cause Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: A Latent Class Approach.

机构信息

Saul B. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Einstein Aging Study, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(1):347-357. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180604.

Abstract

Identifying preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an important step toward developing approaches to early treatment and dementia prevention. We applied latent class analysis (LCA) to 10 baseline neuropsychological assessments for 1,345 participants from Einstein Aging Study. Time-to-event models for all-cause dementia and AD were run examining events in 4-year intervals. Five classes were identified: Mixed-Domain Impairment (n = 107), Memory-Specific Impairment (n = 457), Average (n = 539), Frontal Impairment (n = 118), and Superior Cognition (n = 124). Compared to the Average class, the Mixed-Domain Impairment and Memory-Specific Impairment classes were at higher risk of incident all-cause dementia and AD in the first 4 years from baseline, while the Frontal Impairment class was associated with higher risk between 4 and 8 years of follow-up. LCA identified classes which differ in cross-sectional cognitive patterns and in risk of dementia over specific follow-up intervals.

摘要

识别临床前阿尔茨海默病(AD)是开发早期治疗和预防痴呆方法的重要步骤。我们对来自爱因斯坦老化研究的 1345 名参与者的 10 项基线神经心理学评估应用潜在类别分析(LCA)。使用全因痴呆和 AD 的时间事件模型,以 4 年为间隔检查事件。确定了五个类别:混合域损伤(n = 107),记忆特异性损伤(n = 457),平均(n = 539),额叶损伤(n = 118)和卓越认知(n = 124)。与平均类别相比,混合域损伤和记忆特异性损伤类别的个体在基线后的前 4 年发生全因痴呆和 AD 的风险更高,而额叶损伤类别的个体在随访的 4 到 8 年内的风险更高。LCA 确定了在特定随访间隔内具有不同的横向认知模式和痴呆风险的类别。

相似文献

6
Multimodal lifestyle engagement patterns support cognitive stability beyond neuropathological burden.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Dec 18;15(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01365-9.
9
Distinction between preclinical Alzheimer's disease and depression.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(5):479-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04992.x.
10
Empirically Defining Trajectories of Late-Life Cognitive and Functional Decline.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(1):271-82. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150563.

引用本文的文献

6
Using Mixture Modeling to Construct Subgroups of Cognitive Aging in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(8):1512-1522. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa191.
10
Neuropsychological latent classes at enrollment and postmortem neuropathology.
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Sep;15(9):1195-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of Heterogeneous Cognitive Subgroups in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Latent Class Analysis of the Einstein Aging Study.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 May;24(5):511-523. doi: 10.1017/S135561771700128X. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
A Precision Medicine Initiative for Alzheimer's disease: the road ahead to biomarker-guided integrative disease modeling.
Climacteric. 2017 Apr;20(2):107-118. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1287866. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
4
Dementia Risk and Protective Factors Differ in the Context of Memory Trajectory Groups.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Apr 12;52(3):1013-20. doi: 10.3233/JAD-151114.
5
Therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease in clinical trials.
Pharmacol Rep. 2016 Feb;68(1):127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
6
Temporal course and pathologic basis of unawareness of memory loss in dementia.
Neurology. 2015 Sep 15;85(11):984-91. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001935. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
7
Alzheimer's disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Jul 3;6(4):37. doi: 10.1186/alzrt269. eCollection 2014.
8
Subgroups of Alzheimer's disease: stability of empirical clusters over time.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(2):651-61. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140261.
9
Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors.
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Apr;11(4):415-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验