Duchaine Caroline S, Gilbert-Ouimet Mahee, Aubé Karine, Vezina Michel, Ndjaboue Ruth, Trudel Xavier, Lesage Alain, Moore Lynne, Laurin Danielle, Brisson Chantal
Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Unit, CHU de Québec Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e025948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025948.
Mental health problems (MHPs) are frequent and disabling and are the first or second leading cause of certified sickness absences from work in industrialised countries. They are generally long lasting and generate a considerable human and socioeconomic burden. The deleterious effect of adverse psychosocial work factors on MHP has been documented. However, the evidence regarding the effect of these factors on absences from work for an MHP has not been synthesised since 2007. The proposed systematic review aims to synthesise the effect of adverse psychosocial work factors from three validated theoretical models (the demand-control-support, effort-reward-imbalance and organisational justice models) on the risk of certified absences from work for diagnosed MHP among workers.
A systematic search strategy will be conducted in seven databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, a multistep screening process by independent reviewers will lead to study selection. The search strategy was first run in 16 January 2017 and will be updated in October 2018. Only quantitative, prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the validated theoretical models on certified absence from work for a diagnosed MHP will be considered for inclusion. Extracted data will be used for quantitative and qualitative evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided for high-quality studies and by each psychosocial work factor, after considering homogeneity and number of studies.
As this study will be based only on published studies, ethics approval is not required. Given that psychosocial works factors are frequent and modifiable, the results of this systematic review may provide evidence to support prevention strategies that can help to reduce the human social and economic burden associated with medically certified absences from work for an MHP.
CRD42018091632.
心理健康问题(MHPs)很常见且会导致残疾,是工业化国家经认证的病假缺勤的首要或第二大原因。这些问题通常持续时间较长,并产生相当大的人力和社会经济负担。不良心理社会工作因素对心理健康问题的有害影响已有文献记载。然而,自2007年以来,关于这些因素对因心理健康问题而缺勤的影响的证据尚未得到综合。拟进行的系统评价旨在综合来自三个经过验证的理论模型(需求-控制-支持模型、努力-回报不平衡模型和组织公正模型)的不良心理社会工作因素对工人中经诊断的心理健康问题导致的经认证缺勤风险的影响。
将在七个数据库中进行系统检索策略:医学索引数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)、社会学文摘数据库(Sociological abstracts)和国际社会科学文献索引数据库(IBSS)。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议,由独立评审员进行多步骤筛选过程以选择研究。检索策略于2017年1月16日首次运行,并将于2018年10月更新。仅纳入评估来自经过验证的理论模型的至少一种心理社会工作因素对经诊断的心理健康问题导致的经认证缺勤影响的定量、前瞻性研究。提取的数据将用于定量和定性证据综合以及评估偏倚风险和方法学质量。在考虑研究的同质性和数量后,将为高质量研究以及每个心理社会工作因素提供Meta估计值。
由于本研究仅基于已发表的研究,因此无需伦理批准。鉴于心理社会工作因素很常见且可改变,本系统评价的结果可能为支持预防策略提供证据,这些策略有助于减轻与因心理健康问题而经医学认证的病假缺勤相关的人力、社会和经济负担。
CRD42018091632。