Amaechi Bennett T, Lemke Kelly C, Saha Shyamali, Gelfond Jonathan
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Department of Developmental Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Open Dent J. 2018 Aug 31;12:572-585. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010572. eCollection 2018.
The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Apadent Pro (Sangi) Nanohydroxyapatite (nHAP) dental cream to relieve Dentin Hypersensitivity (DHS), compared with a positive control cream containing 20% pure silica (Silica).
In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, patients diagnosed with DHS and qualified to participate were randomized into two groups, nHAP (n=25) and Silica (n=26). Subjects' baseline and posttreatment sensitivity were assessed using two pain scales, a four-point Dental Pain Scale (DPS) followed by a linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS), after the application of ice-cold and air stimuli. Subjects used custom-fabricated trays to apply their respective cream for 5 minutes once daily following brushing with standard fluoride toothpaste. Posttreatment sensitivity (efficacy) was assessed every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Mean treatment outcomes (percentage change from baseline) at each time point were compared using the Tukey HSD test for multiplicity (<0.05).
With either air or cold stimulus, VAS and DPS indicated a significant (<0.001) reduction in DHS at each time point with either nHAP or Silica. Comparing pain scales, VAS showed no significant difference in DHS reduction between the products with either air or cold. However, with DPS, DHS reduction was significantly (<0.05) better with Silica than with nHAP at all time points with cold, and at 2, 4, and 8 weeks with air.
Both Apadent Pro nHAP and Silica dental creams are effective at promoting the relief of DHS symptoms. When comparing the efficacy of the two compounds to relieve DHS, results of the two pain scales were conflicting.
本研究旨在调查与含20%纯二氧化硅(Silica)的阳性对照乳膏相比,Apadent Pro(三吉)纳米羟基磷灰石(nHAP)牙膏缓解牙本质过敏(DHS)的有效性。
在这项双盲、随机、平行组临床试验中,将诊断为DHS且符合参与条件的患者随机分为两组,nHAP组(n = 25)和Silica组(n = 26)。在施加冰冷和空气刺激后,使用两种疼痛量表评估受试者的基线和治疗后敏感性,即四分制牙科疼痛量表(DPS),随后是线性视觉模拟量表(VAS)。受试者使用定制托盘,在使用标准含氟牙膏刷牙后,每天一次涂抹各自的乳膏5分钟。在8周内每2周评估一次治疗后敏感性(疗效)。使用Tukey HSD检验对多个时间点的平均治疗结果(相对于基线的百分比变化)进行比较(<0.05)。
无论是空气刺激还是冷刺激,VAS和DPS均表明,nHAP或Silica在每个时间点均使DHS显著降低(<0.001)。比较疼痛量表,VAS显示在空气或冷刺激下,两种产品在降低DHS方面无显著差异。然而,对于DPS,在冷刺激的所有时间点以及空气刺激的第2、4和8周,Silica降低DHS的效果均显著优于nHAP(<0.05)。
Apadent Pro nHAP牙膏和Silica牙膏在促进缓解DHS症状方面均有效。在比较两种化合物缓解DHS的疗效时,两种疼痛量表的结果相互矛盾。