• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1型糖尿病青少年及其照顾者对基于互联网的多媒体决策辅助工具的电子验证使用情况。

Electronically Verified Use of Internet-Based, Multimedia Decision Aids by Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers.

作者信息

Wysocki Tim, James Lauren, Milkes Amy, Taylor Alex, Pierce Jessica, Brinkman William B, Carakushansky Mauri, Ross Judith, Hirschfeld Fiona

机构信息

Nemours Children's Health System, Jacksonville, Florida.

Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, Florida.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Apr 18;3(1):2381468318769857. doi: 10.1177/2381468318769857. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/2381468318769857
PMID:30288443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6157427/
Abstract

Decision aids (DAs) are central to shared decision making (SDM) interventions, yet little is known about patients' actual DA use. Adequate utilization of DAs could optimize SDM effectiveness. Electronic DAs enable more objective tracking and analysis of actual DA utilization than do paper DAs. This report is part of an ongoing randomized controlled SDM trial enrolling adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers ( = 153) who were considering use of an insulin pump or continuous glucose monitor. Extensive stakeholder engagement guided creation of two online DAs. After completing baseline measures, 133 dyads were randomized to SDM (access to the pertinent DA) or Usual Care (clinic routines for preparing candidates for adopting these devices). Utilization data showed that 80% of caregivers and 66% of youths logged into a DA at least once; youths and caregivers, respectively, dedicated a mean of 44.7 and 55.0 minutes to website use and viewed 72.2% and 77.4% of the DA content. Median total duration from enrollment to last DA logout was 48.2 days for adolescents and 45.6 days for caregivers. Bivariate comparisons showed that non-Hispanic, Caucasian females from households with higher socioeconomic status were significantly more likely to login to the assigned DA at least once. Hierarchical multiple regression showed that adolescent males with lower levels of health literacy demonstrated fewer DA logins ( = 2.59; < 0.009), but identified no significant predictors of adolescents' or caregiver' duration of DA use or proportion of DA content viewed. Future SDM trials should seek to promote DA use, especially by non-White adolescents, perhaps with direct assistance with the initial DA login. Trials employing electronic DAs should routinely report and analyze utilization data.

摘要

决策辅助工具(DAs)是共享决策(SDM)干预措施的核心,但对于患者实际使用DAs的情况却知之甚少。充分利用DAs可以优化SDM的效果。与纸质DAs相比,电子DAs能够更客观地跟踪和分析实际的DA使用情况。本报告是一项正在进行的随机对照SDM试验的一部分,该试验招募了1型糖尿病青少年及其照顾者(n = 153),他们正在考虑使用胰岛素泵或连续血糖监测仪。广泛的利益相关者参与指导创建了两个在线DAs。在完成基线测量后,133对参与者被随机分配到SDM组(可使用相关的DA)或常规护理组(为准备采用这些设备的候选人提供诊所常规服务)。使用数据显示,80%的照顾者和66%的青少年至少登录过一次DA;青少年和照顾者分别平均花费44.7分钟和55.0分钟使用网站,并浏览了DA内容的72.2%和77.4%。从入组到最后一次退出DA的总时长中位数,青少年为48.2天,照顾者为45.6天。双变量比较显示,来自社会经济地位较高家庭的非西班牙裔白人女性登录指定DA至少一次的可能性显著更高。分层多元回归显示,健康素养水平较低的青少年男性登录DA的次数较少(β = 2.59;p < 0.009),但未发现青少年或照顾者使用DA的时长或浏览DA内容比例的显著预测因素。未来的SDM试验应寻求促进DA的使用,特别是非白人青少年,或许可以在首次登录DA时提供直接帮助。采用电子DAs的试验应定期报告和分析使用数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/939f/6157427/56a3023ce2ea/10.1177_2381468318769857-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/939f/6157427/56a3023ce2ea/10.1177_2381468318769857-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/939f/6157427/56a3023ce2ea/10.1177_2381468318769857-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Electronically Verified Use of Internet-Based, Multimedia Decision Aids by Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers.1型糖尿病青少年及其照顾者对基于互联网的多媒体决策辅助工具的电子验证使用情况。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Apr 18;3(1):2381468318769857. doi: 10.1177/2381468318769857. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
2
Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol.一项使用以用户为中心的设计和维基平台进行快速原型制作的、涉及重症监护病房患者及医护人员参与的心肺复苏决策辅助工具的开发:一项研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 11;5(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5107.
3
Caregivers of Patients Considering a Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device and a Shared Decision-Making Intervention: The DECIDE-LVAD Trial.考虑使用目的地治疗左心室辅助装置的患者的护理人员和一项共同决策干预措施:DECIDE-LVAD 试验。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Nov;6(11):904-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Exploring Provider Reactions to Decision Aid Distribution and Shared Decision Making: Lessons from Two Specialties.探索医疗服务提供者对决策辅助工具分发及共同决策的反应:来自两个专业领域的经验教训。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):113-126. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16671933. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
5
Consideration of Insulin Pumps or Continuous Glucose Monitors by Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents: Stakeholder Engagement in the Design of Web-Based Decision Aids.1型糖尿病青少年及其父母对胰岛素泵或持续葡萄糖监测仪的考虑:利益相关者参与基于网络的决策辅助工具的设计
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Aug;42(4):395-407. doi: 10.1177/0145721716647492. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol.系统评价促进慢性病共同决策要素的决策辅助工具:研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 7;6(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9.
7
Efficacy of decision aid delivery modes in prostate cancer screening: umbrella review and network meta-analysis.决策辅助工具交付模式在前列腺癌筛查中的疗效:伞形综述与网状Meta分析
BJU Int. 2025 Feb;135(2):222-234. doi: 10.1111/bju.16545. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
8
Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review.促进慢性病共同决策要素的决策辅助工具:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4.
9
Decision Support Strategies for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Less Is More: A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial (DECIDE-OA Study).髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎的决策支持策略:少即是多:一项随机对照有效性试验(DECIDE-OA 研究)。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Sep 18;101(18):1645-1653. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00004.
10
Impact of sociodemographic patient characteristics on the efficacy of decision AIDS: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials.社会人口学患者特征对决策辅助工具疗效的影响:7项随机试验的患者层面荟萃分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 May;7(3):360-7. doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000006. Epub 2014 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.14. 儿童和青少年:2025年糖尿病照护标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S283-S305. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S014.
2
Decision-making for children and adolescents: a scoping review of interventions increasing participation in decision-making.儿童和青少年的决策:对提高决策参与度干预措施的范围综述
Pediatr Res. 2024 Oct 6. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03509-5.
3
A Longitudinal View of Disparities in Insulin Pump Use Among Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes: Teen and Parent of Teen Versions.青少年和青少年父母版糖尿病问题评估量表的心理测量特性
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Jun 1;43(5):561-571. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx146.
2
Development and Pilot Testing of Multimedia Patient Education Tools for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis.多媒体患者教育工具的开发与初步测试:针对膝关节骨关节炎、骨质疏松症和类风湿关节炎患者。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Feb;70(2):213-220. doi: 10.1002/acr.23271. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
3
Consideration of Insulin Pumps or Continuous Glucose Monitors by Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents: Stakeholder Engagement in the Design of Web-Based Decision Aids.
胰岛素泵在 1 型糖尿病青少年中的使用差异的纵向观察:青少年糖尿病研究 (SEARCH)。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):131-139. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0340. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
1型糖尿病青少年及其父母对胰岛素泵或持续葡萄糖监测仪的考虑:利益相关者参与基于网络的决策辅助工具的设计
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Aug;42(4):395-407. doi: 10.1177/0145721716647492. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses.基于计算机的决策辅助工具的特点:系统评价、主题综合分析和荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 26;18(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4982.
5
Shared Decision Making in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿科中的共同决策:系统评价与荟萃分析
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 May 14.
6
Implementation of a cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral patient decision aid in routine clinical practice: an observational study.在常规临床实践中实施囊性纤维化肺移植转诊患者决策辅助工具:一项观察性研究。
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 7;10:17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0206-4.
7
User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.以用户为中心的设计与患者决策辅助工具的开发:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-11.
8
Launching a virtual decision lab: development and field-testing of a web-based patient decision support research platform.启动虚拟决策实验室:基于网络的患者决策支持研究平台的开发与实地测试
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 12;14:112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0112-8.
9
Shared decision making for hydroxyurea treatment initiation in children with sickle cell anemia.镰状细胞贫血患儿开始羟基脲治疗的共同决策
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Feb;62(2):184-185. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25124. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
10
An emerging field of research: challenges in pediatric decision making.一个新兴的研究领域:儿科决策中的挑战。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):403-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14546901. Epub 2014 Aug 21.