Suppr超能文献

个体肌肉肥大和力量对高与低阻力训练频率的反应。

Individual Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Responses to High vs. Low Resistance Training Frequencies.

机构信息

MUSCULAB-Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos-UFSCar, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.

School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Apr;33(4):897-901. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002864.

Abstract

Damas, F, Barcelos, C, Nóbrega, SR, Ugrinowitsch, C, Lixandrão, ME, Santos, LMEd, Conceição, MS, Vechin, FC, and Libardi, CA. Individual muscle hypertrophy and strength responses to high vs. low resistance training frequencies. J Strength Cond Res 33(4): 897-901, 2019-The aim of this short communication was to compare the individual muscle mass and strength gains with high (HF) vs. low (LF) resistance training (RT) frequencies using data from our previous study. We used a within-subject design in which 20 subjects had one leg randomly assigned to HF (5× per week) and the other to LF (2 or 3× per week). Muscle cross-sectional area and 1 repetition maximum were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of RT. HF showed a higher 8-week accumulated total training volume (TTV) (p < 0.0001) compared with LF. Muscle cross-sectional area and 1 repetition maximum values increased significantly and similarly for HF and LF protocols (p > 0.05). This short communication highlights that some individuals showed greater muscle mass and strength gains after HF (31.6 and 26.3% of individuals, respectively), other had greater gains with LF (36.8 and 15.8% of individuals, respectively), and even others showed similar responses between HF and LF, regardless of the consequent higher or lower TTV resulted from HF and LF, respectively. Importantly, individual manipulation of RT frequency can improve the intrasubject responsiveness to training, but the effect is limited to each individual's capacity to respond to RT. Finally, individual response to different frequencies and resulted TTV does not necessarily agree between muscle hypertrophy and strength gains.

摘要

达马斯、F、巴塞洛斯、C、诺布雷加、SR、乌格里诺维奇、C、利桑德朗、ME、桑托斯、LMEd、康塞西奥、MS、维钦、FC 和利瓦迪、CA。高与低阻力训练频率对个体肌肉肥大和力量的影响。J 力量与调节研究 33(4):897-901,2019-本短通讯的目的是比较高(HF)与低(LF)阻力训练(RT)频率下个体肌肉质量和力量的增加,使用我们之前研究的数据。我们采用了一种在体设计,其中 20 名受试者的一条腿随机分配到 HF(每周 5 次),另一条腿分配到 LF(每周 2 或 3 次)。肌肉横截面积和 1 次重复最大力量在基线和 8 周 RT 后进行评估。HF 显示出比 LF 更高的 8 周累积总训练量(TTV)(p<0.0001)。HF 和 LF 方案的肌肉横截面积和 1 次重复最大力量值均显著增加,且增加幅度相似(p>0.05)。本短通讯强调,一些个体在 HF 后表现出更大的肌肉质量和力量增加(分别为 31.6%和 26.3%的个体),其他个体在 LF 后表现出更大的增加(分别为 36.8%和 15.8%的个体),甚至还有一些个体在 HF 和 LF 之间表现出相似的反应,无论 HF 和 LF 分别导致的 TTV 更高或更低。重要的是,RT 频率的个体操作可以提高训练的个体反应性,但这种效果仅限于每个个体对 RT 的反应能力。最后,不同频率和导致的 TTV 的个体反应不一定在肌肉肥大和力量增加之间一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验