Li Hui-Min, Zhang Ren-Jie, Gao Hai, Jia Chong-Yu, Zhang Jian-Xiang, Dong Fu-Long, Shen Cai-Liang
Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui.
Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (AnHui Provincial Hospital), China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(40):e12666. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012666.
Because of aging of population, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) appears an increasing incidence rate. Conservative therapy (CT) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) have been used to treat OVCFs. However, an increase in new vertebral compression fractures at nontreated levels following BKP is of concern. It is still not clear whether new fractures were a result of BKP and the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the new fractures risk after BKP compared with CT.
An exhaustive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective nonrandomized controlled study that compared BKP with CT for patients suffering OVCF. A random-effect model was used. Results were reported as standardized mean difference or risk ratio with 95% confidence interval.
Twelve studies were included and there was no significant difference in total new fractures (P = .33) and adjacent fractures (P = .83) between 2 treatments. Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate significant differences in follow-up period, mean age, anti-osteoporosis therapy, and the proportion of women.
Our systematic review revealed that an increased risk of fracture of vertebral bodies was not associated with BKP compared with CT.
由于人口老龄化,骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的发病率呈上升趋势。保守治疗(CT)和球囊后凸成形术(BKP)已被用于治疗OVCF。然而,BKP后未治疗节段出现新的椎体压缩骨折令人担忧。目前尚不清楚新骨折是否是BKP的结果,本荟萃分析的目的是评估与CT相比,BKP后新骨折的风险。
对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行了详尽的文献检索,以确定比较BKP与CT治疗OVCF患者的随机对照试验和前瞻性非随机对照研究。采用随机效应模型。结果以标准化均数差或风险比及95%置信区间报告。
纳入12项研究,两种治疗方法在总新发骨折(P = 0.33)和相邻节段骨折(P = 0.83)方面无显著差异。亚组分析未显示随访时间、平均年龄、抗骨质疏松治疗和女性比例有显著差异。
我们的系统评价显示,与CT相比,BKP不会增加椎体骨折的风险。