• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Diabetes Online Community Engagement on Health Indicators: Cross-Sectional Study.糖尿病在线社区参与对健康指标的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Apr 24;3(2):e8. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8603.
2
Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China.糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者在在线糖尿病社交平台上的人际互动强度与健康自我效能之间的相互关系:中国的深入调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 26;17(15):5375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155375.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Glycated Hemoglobin Differences Among Blog-Reading Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Those Who Do Not Read Blogs: Cross-Sectional Study.与不阅读博客的1型糖尿病成年患者相比,阅读博客的1型糖尿病成年患者糖化血红蛋白的差异:横断面研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Apr 2;4(2):e13634. doi: 10.2196/13634.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
The diabetes online community: Older adults supporting self-care through peer health.糖尿病在线社区:老年人通过同行健康支持自我护理。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):518-523. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
User Engagement Within an Online Peer Support Community (Depression Connect) and Recovery-Related Changes in Empowerment: Longitudinal User Survey.在线同伴支持社区(抑郁连接)中的用户参与度以及赋权方面与康复相关的变化:纵向用户调查
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 2;6(11):e39912. doi: 10.2196/39912.
8
What is the Profile of Individuals Joining the KNEEguru Online Health Community? A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.加入膝关节专家在线健康社区的人群概况是怎样的?一项横断面混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 18;18(4):e84. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5374.
9
Help-Seeking, Support, and Engagement in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Online Communities on Facebook: Content Analysis.在脸书上的妊娠期糖尿病在线社区中寻求帮助、获得支持与参与情况:内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 26;8:e49494. doi: 10.2196/49494.
10
Change in Glycemic Control With Use of a Digital Therapeutic in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Cohort Study.使用数字疗法对2型糖尿病成人患者血糖控制的影响:队列研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Feb 14;3(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.9591.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the feasibility of a co-designed technology-enabled, collaborative care program for young adults with type 1 diabetes and diabetes distress: A protocol.评估一项为1型糖尿病和糖尿病困扰的年轻人共同设计的、技术支持的协作护理项目的可行性:一项方案。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 29;11:20552076251365134. doi: 10.1177/20552076251365134. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Peer Mentoring Improves Diabetes Technology Use and Reduces Diabetes Distress Among Underserved Communities: Outcomes of a Pilot Diabetes Support Coach Intervention.同伴辅导可改善糖尿病技术的使用并减轻弱势群体中的糖尿病困扰:糖尿病支持教练试点干预的结果
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Jul 9;2025:1970247. doi: 10.1155/jdr/1970247. eCollection 2025.
3
Toward Personalized Digital Experiences to Promote Diabetes Self-Management: Mixed Methods Social Computing Approach.迈向促进糖尿病自我管理的个性化数字体验:混合方法社会计算方法。
JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Jan 7;10:e60109. doi: 10.2196/60109.
4
Examining the Emotional and Physical Health Impact in Users of Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery and Sources of Support: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Narratives.探究开源自动胰岛素输送用户的情绪和身体健康影响及支持来源:患者叙述的定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 6;27:e48406. doi: 10.2196/48406.
5
Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Attaining HbA1c Targets in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.探索社交媒体对伊拉克2型糖尿病患者实现糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标的影响:一项横断面研究
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2024 Oct 23;17:11795514241293346. doi: 10.1177/11795514241293346. eCollection 2024.
6
U-shaped association between online information exchange and app usage frequency: a large-scale survey of China 's online young and middle-aged people with pre diabetes and diabetes.在线信息交流与应用程序使用频率之间的 U 型关系:一项针对中国患有糖尿病前期和糖尿病的中青年人群的大规模在线调查。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 21;14:1141645. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1141645. eCollection 2023.
7
Integration of the Vision of People With Diabetes Into the Development Process to Improve Self-management via Diabetes Apps: Qualitative Interview Study.将糖尿病患者的愿景融入开发过程以通过糖尿病应用程序改善自我管理:定性访谈研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Apr 27;8:e38474. doi: 10.2196/38474.
8
When People With Chronic Conditions Turn to Peers on Social Media to Obtain and Share Information: Systematic Review of the Implications for Relationships With Health Care Professionals.当慢性病患者在社交媒体上寻求和分享信息时转向同行:对与医疗保健专业人员关系影响的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 17;25:e41156. doi: 10.2196/41156.
9
Making Diabetes Care Fit-Are We Making Progress?使糖尿病护理适宜——我们有进展吗?
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2021 Apr 16;2:658817. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.658817. eCollection 2021.
10
Perspectives on Promoting Physical Activity Using eHealth in Primary Care by Health Care Professionals and Individuals With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员以及糖尿病前期和2型糖尿病患者对在初级保健中使用电子健康促进身体活动的看法:定性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Jan 20;8:e39474. doi: 10.2196/39474.

本文引用的文献

1
2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.2017 年版《国家糖尿病患者自我管理教育和支持标准》。
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Feb;44(1):35-50. doi: 10.1177/0145721718754797.
2
The diabetes online community: Older adults supporting self-care through peer health.糖尿病在线社区:老年人通过同行健康支持自我护理。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):518-523. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Empowered citizen 'health hackers' who are not waiting.积极主动的公民“健康黑客”不会坐以待毙。
BMC Med. 2016 Aug 17;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0670-y.
4
Frequent Surfing on Social Health Networks is Associated With Increased Knowledge and Patient Health Activation.频繁浏览社交健康网络与知识增加及患者健康激活相关。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 10;18(8):e212. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5832.
5
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016 Abridged for Primary Care Providers.《2016年糖尿病医疗护理标准》(初级医疗服务提供者简版)
Clin Diabetes. 2016 Jan;34(1):3-21. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.34.1.3.
6
Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?来自网络讨论论坛的健康建议:危险程度如何?
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 6;18(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5051.
7
Puentes hacia una mejor vida (Bridges to a Better Life): Outcome of a Diabetes Control Peer Support Intervention.通往美好生活的桥梁:糖尿病控制同伴支持干预的结果
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-17. doi: 10.1370/afm.1807.
8
An Innovative Approach to Informing Research: Gathering Perspectives on Diabetes Care Challenges From an Online Patient Community.一种创新的研究信息获取方法:从在线患者社区收集关于糖尿病护理挑战的观点。
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Jun 30;4(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3856.
9
The emerging diabetes online community.新兴的糖尿病在线社区。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015;11(4):261-72. doi: 10.2174/1573399811666150421123448.
10
The eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model: a theory derivation approach.电子健康增强型慢性病护理模式:一种理论推导方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 1;17(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4067.

糖尿病在线社区参与对健康指标的影响:横断面研究。

Effect of Diabetes Online Community Engagement on Health Indicators: Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Litchman Michelle L, Edelman Linda S, Donaldson Gary W

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Utah Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Apr 24;3(2):e8. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8603.

DOI:10.2196/diabetes.8603
PMID:30291079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6238850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful diabetes management requires ongoing lifelong self-care and can require that individuals with diabetes become experts in translating care recommendations into real-life day-to-day diabetes self-care strategies. The diabetes online community comprises multiple websites that include social media sites, blogs, and discussion groups for people with diabetes to chat and exchange information. Online communities can provide disease-specific practical advice and emotional support, allow users to share experiences, and encourage self-advocacy and patient empowerment. However, there has been little research about whether diabetes online community use is associated with better diabetes self-care or quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to survey adults with diabetes who participated in the diabetes online community to better understand and describe who is using the diabetes online community, how they are using it, and whether the use of the diabetes online community was associated with health indicators.

METHODS

We recruited adults diagnosed with diabetes who used at least one of 4 different diabetes-related online communities to complete an online survey. Participants' demographics, reported glycated hemoglobin (HbA), health-related quality of life (SF-12v2), level of diabetes self-care (Self-Care Inventory-Revised), and diabetes online community use (level of intensity and engagement) were collected. We examined the relationships between demographics, diabetes online community use, and health indicators (health-related quality of life, self-care, and HbA levels). We used binary logistic regression to determine the extent to which diabetes online community use predicted an HbA <7% or ≥7% after controlling statistically for other variables in the model.

RESULTS

A total of 183 adults participated in this study. Participants were mostly female (71.6%, 131/183), white (95.1%, 174/183), US citizens (82.5%, 151/183), had type 1 diabetes (69.7%, 129/183), with a mean age of 44.7 years (SD 14) and diabetes duration of 18.2 years (SD 14.6). Participants had higher diabetes self-care (P<.001, mean 72.4, SD 12.1) and better health-related quality of life (physical component summary P<.001, mean 64.8, SD 19; mental component summary P<.001, mean 66.6, SD 21.6) when compared with norms for diabetes. Diabetes online community engagement was a strong predictor of A, reducing the odds of having an A ≥7% by 33.8% for every point increase in diabetes online community engagement (0-5). Our data also indicated that study participants are oftentimes (67.2%, 123/183) not informing their healthcare providers about their diabetes online community use even though most (91.2%, 161/181) are seeing their healthcare provider on a regular basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that individuals highly engaged with diabetes online community are more likely to have better glycemic levels compared with those with lower engagement. Furthermore, diabetes online community users have high health-related quality of life and diabetes self-care levels. Supplementing usual healthcare activities with diabetes online community use may encourage knowledge and support among a population that needs to optimize its diabetes self-care. Further studies are needed to determine how diabetes online community engagement may affect health outcomes.

摘要

背景

成功管理糖尿病需要持续终身的自我护理,这可能要求糖尿病患者成为将护理建议转化为现实生活中日常糖尿病自我护理策略的专家。糖尿病在线社区由多个网站组成,包括社交媒体网站、博客以及供糖尿病患者聊天和交流信息的讨论组。在线社区可以提供针对特定疾病的实用建议和情感支持,让用户分享经验,并鼓励自我倡导和患者赋权。然而,关于使用糖尿病在线社区是否与更好的糖尿病自我护理或生活质量相关,目前研究较少。

目的

本研究旨在对参与糖尿病在线社区的成年糖尿病患者进行调查,以更好地了解和描述哪些人在使用糖尿病在线社区、他们如何使用该社区,以及使用糖尿病在线社区是否与健康指标相关。

方法

我们招募了被诊断患有糖尿病且使用过4个不同糖尿病相关在线社区中至少一个的成年人,让他们完成一项在线调查。收集了参与者的人口统计学信息、报告的糖化血红蛋白(HbA)、健康相关生活质量(SF-12v2)、糖尿病自我护理水平(修订版自我护理量表)以及糖尿病在线社区使用情况(参与强度和参与度)。我们研究了人口统计学、糖尿病在线社区使用情况与健康指标(健康相关生活质量、自我护理和HbA水平)之间的关系。在对模型中的其他变量进行统计学控制后,我们使用二元逻辑回归来确定糖尿病在线社区使用在何种程度上能够预测HbA<7%或≥7%。

结果

共有183名成年人参与了本研究。参与者大多为女性(71.6%,131/183)、白人(95.1%,174/183)、美国公民(82.5%,151/183),患有1型糖尿病(69.7%,129/183),平均年龄44.7岁(标准差14),糖尿病病程18.2年(标准差14.6)。与糖尿病患者的规范标准相比,参与者的糖尿病自我护理水平更高(P<.001,平均72.4,标准差12.1),健康相关生活质量更好(身体成分总结P<.001,平均64.8,标准差19;心理成分总结P<.001,平均66.6,标准差21.6)。糖尿病在线社区参与度是糖化血红蛋白水平的有力预测因素,糖尿病在线社区参与度每增加1分(0 - 5分),糖化血红蛋白≥7%的几率就降低33.8%。我们的数据还表明,尽管大多数参与者(91.2%,161/181)定期看医疗保健提供者,但仍有67.2%(123/183)的参与者未告知他们的医疗保健提供者其使用糖尿病在线社区的情况。

结论

我们的结果表明,与参与度较低的人相比,高度参与糖尿病在线社区的个体更有可能拥有更好的血糖水平。此外,糖尿病在线社区用户具有较高的健康相关生活质量和糖尿病自我护理水平。将糖尿病在线社区的使用作为常规医疗保健活动的补充,可能会在需要优化糖尿病自我护理的人群中促进知识获取和提供支持。需要进一步研究来确定糖尿病在线社区参与度如何影响健康结果。