Ray C G, Minnich L L
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):355-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.355-357.1987.
Rapid immunofluorescence (FA) methods for the detection of common respiratory viruses were compared with culture results over a 3-year period to assess the relative efficiency of FA in a clinical laboratory setting. For respiratory syncytial virus, efficiencies were high (sensitivity, 90 to 95%; specificity, 92 to 95%). The sensitivity of FA for detection of parainfluenza virus type 1, parainfluenza virus type 3, influenza A virus, and adenoviruses ranged from 28 to 63%, but specificities for these viruses were uniformly 98 to 100%. The observations form a basis for consideration of selective reduction of routine culture procedures for specimens with initial positive rapid FA results; however, the possibility of dual viral infection in some situations must also be considered.
在三年时间里,将用于检测常见呼吸道病毒的快速免疫荧光(FA)方法与培养结果进行了比较,以评估在临床实验室环境中FA的相对效率。对于呼吸道合胞病毒,效率很高(敏感性为90%至95%;特异性为92%至95%)。FA检测1型副流感病毒、3型副流感病毒、甲型流感病毒和腺病毒的敏感性范围为28%至63%,但这些病毒的特异性均为98%至100%。这些观察结果为考虑对初始快速FA结果呈阳性的标本选择性减少常规培养程序提供了依据;然而,在某些情况下也必须考虑双重病毒感染的可能性。