Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit Aveiro Healthcare Centre, Aveiro, Portugal.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15602. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
To evaluate the effect of inhaler education programs on clinical outcomes and exacerbation rates in older adults with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Older adults with asthma or COPD, either in primary or secondary health care and pharmacy setting.
We searched the Medline, Embase, and Central databases according to the main eligibility criteria for inclusion: systematic reviews, meta-analysis, clinical trials and quasi-experimental studies; participants aged 65 and older; education on inhaler technique and reporting of disease control and exacerbation rates. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations scale for quality assessment and used a random-effect model with Mantel-Haenszel adjustment to perform a meta-analysis.
We included 8 studies (4 randomized, 4 quasi-experimental) with a total of 1,812 participants. The most frequent type of intervention was physical demonstration of inhaler technique, training with placebo devices. Five studies showed significant reduction in exacerbation rates (pooled risk ratio=0.71, 95% confidence interval=0.59-0.86; p < .001), although effect on disease control and quality of life showed high discrepancy in the reported results, and all randomized studies revealed uncertainty in their risk of bias assessment.
All interventions seemed to improve inhaler performance and clinically relevant outcomes, but a placebo device could be the most effective. There is evidence that interventions reduce exacerbation risk in older adults, although to an overall moderate degree. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:57-66, 2019.
评估吸入器教育计划对老年哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床结局和加重率的影响。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
在初级或二级卫生保健和药房环境中,患有哮喘或 COPD 的老年人。
我们根据纳入的主要标准,在 Medline、Embase 和中央数据库中进行了搜索:系统评价、荟萃分析、临床试验和准实验研究;参与者年龄在 65 岁及以上;吸入器技术教育和疾病控制及加重率报告。我们使用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(Grading of Recommendations,Assessment,Development and Evaluations)量表进行质量评估,并使用随机效应模型和 Mantel-Haenszel 调整进行荟萃分析。
我们纳入了 8 项研究(4 项随机对照研究,4 项准实验研究),共纳入 1812 名参与者。最常见的干预类型是吸入器技术的物理演示、安慰剂装置训练。5 项研究显示加重率显著降低(汇总风险比=0.71,95%置信区间=0.59-0.86;p<.001),尽管疾病控制和生活质量的效果在报告结果中存在很大差异,并且所有随机研究都显示出其偏倚评估的不确定性。
所有干预措施似乎都能提高吸入器的性能和与临床相关的结果,但安慰剂装置可能是最有效的。有证据表明,干预措施可以降低老年人的加重风险,但总体程度为中度。美国老年医学会杂志 67:57-66,2019。