Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was first described in 2016 as a regional block for thoracic neuropathic pain. Given its short history, there are a paucity of controlled clinical trials, yet an abundance of case reports. The primary aim of this review is to examine pooled clinical data from published literature to gain an understanding of ESPB characteristics.
A PubMed search was conducted to identify all ESPB related publications. Inclusion criteria included reports of ESP single shot, continuous infusion, intermittent bolus, human and cadaveric studies. Only publications obtained in English were included. Measures included type of publication, year and country of publication, journal of publication, block technique, anatomic location, age, opioid and adjunct pain medication use, sensory and motor changes, side effects and adverse events. Qualitative statistics were used.
The initial search yielded 201 publications. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 85 publications from 21 journals were included in the pooled review which yielded 242 reported cases between 2016 and 2018. The majority of publications reported single shot techniques (80.2%), followed by intermittent boluses (12.0%) and continuous infusions (7.9%). 90.9% reported use of multimodal analgesia in addition to the ESPB and 34.7% reported sensory changes from ESPB. A reduction in opioid use was reported in 34.7% of cases. One adverse event involving a pneumothorax was reported.
To our knowledge, this is the first review providing a pooled review of ESPB characteristics. The ESPB appears to be a safe and effective option for multiple types thoracic, abdominal, and extremity surgeries.
竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)于 2016 年首次被描述为一种用于治疗胸神经病理性疼痛的区域阻滞方法。由于其历史较短,因此控制临床试验较少,但病例报告却很多。本综述的主要目的是检查已发表文献中的汇总临床数据,以了解 ESPB 的特征。
对 PubMed 进行了检索,以确定所有与 ESPB 相关的出版物。纳入标准包括 ESP 单次注射、连续输注、间歇性推注、人体和尸体研究的报告。仅纳入英文出版物。测量指标包括出版物类型、发表年份和国家、出版物期刊、阻滞技术、解剖位置、年龄、阿片类药物和辅助镇痛药物的使用、感觉和运动变化、副作用和不良事件。使用定性统计。
最初的搜索产生了 201 篇出版物。应用纳入和排除标准后,从 21 种期刊中纳入了 85 篇出版物,汇总审查共纳入了 2016 年至 2018 年之间的 242 例报告病例。大多数出版物报告了单次注射技术(80.2%),其次是间歇性推注(12.0%)和连续输注(7.9%)。90.9%的出版物报告了除 ESPB 之外还使用了多模式镇痛,34.7%的出版物报告了 ESPB 引起的感觉变化。34.7%的病例报告阿片类药物使用减少。报告了一例气胸不良事件。
据我们所知,这是第一篇对 ESPB 特征进行汇总审查的综述。ESPB 似乎是治疗多种类型的胸部、腹部和四肢手术的安全有效的选择。