• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坐立桌软件现在可以监测并提示办公人员改变健康行为。

Sit-Stand Desk Software Can Now Monitor and Prompt Office Workers to Change Health Behaviors.

机构信息

Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):816-824. doi: 10.1177/0018720818807043. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1177/0018720818807043
PMID:30296174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6637722/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a computer-based intervention designed to increase sit-stand desk usage and help reverse workplace physical inactivity.

BACKGROUND

Sit-stand desks have been successful in reducing workplace sedentary behavior, but the challenge remains for an effective method to increase the usage in order to experience the health and productivity benefits.

METHOD

Data collection (1-year field study with 194 workers) used a novel method of computer software that continuously recorded objective electric sit-stand desk usage, while taking into account the time a worker spends away from their desk (breaks, meetings). During the baseline period, all workers' desk usage was recorded by the software, and the intervention period consisted of software reminders and real-time feedback to all workers to change desk positions. Pooled means were calculated to determine desk usage patterns, and effect sizes and pairwise mean differences were analyzed to test for intervention significance.

RESULTS

The intervention doubled desk usage by increasing ~1 change to ~2 changes per work day. There was a 76% reduction in workers who never used the sit-stand function of the desk. Medium to large effect sizes from the intervention were observed in all three primary outcome measures (desk in sitting/standing position and desk position changes per work day).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate an effective intervention that increased postural transitioning and interrupted prolonged inactivity while remaining at the workstation.

APPLICATION

The methods and results in this research study show that we can quantify an increase in desk usage and collect aggregate data continuously.

摘要

目的

确定一种基于计算机的干预措施的有效性,该措施旨在增加站立式办公桌的使用并帮助扭转工作场所的身体不活动状态。

背景

站立式办公桌已成功减少了工作场所的久坐行为,但仍面临挑战,需要一种有效的方法来增加使用频率,以体验健康和生产力方面的益处。

方法

数据收集(为期 1 年的现场研究,涉及 194 名工人)采用了一种新颖的计算机软件方法,该方法连续记录客观的电动站立式办公桌使用情况,同时考虑了工人离开办公桌的时间(休息、会议)。在基线期,所有工人的办公桌使用情况均由软件记录,干预期包括向所有工人发送软件提醒和实时反馈,以改变办公桌位置。计算汇总平均值以确定办公桌使用模式,并分析效应大小和成对均值差异,以检验干预的显著性。

结果

干预措施将办公桌的使用次数增加了一倍,从平均每天约 1 次增加到约 2 次。从未使用过办公桌站立功能的工人比例降低了 76%。在所有三个主要结果测量指标(办公桌的坐立姿势和每天的办公桌位置变化)中,都观察到了中等至较大的干预效应大小。

结论

这些发现表明,该干预措施有效增加了姿势转换,打断了长时间的不活动状态,同时保持在工作站上。

应用

本研究中的方法和结果表明,我们可以定量增加办公桌的使用频率并连续收集总体数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/60528061848d/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/81f564665026/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/a0ef6fb5398a/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/60528061848d/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/81f564665026/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/a0ef6fb5398a/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/6637722/60528061848d/10.1177_0018720818807043-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Sit-Stand Desk Software Can Now Monitor and Prompt Office Workers to Change Health Behaviors.坐立桌软件现在可以监测并提示办公人员改变健康行为。
Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):816-824. doi: 10.1177/0018720818807043. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
Smart Software Can Increase Sit-Stand Desk Transitions During Active Computer Use.智能软件可增加主动使用计算机时的坐站切换次数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 9;16(13):2438. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132438.
3
"Why would you want to stand?" an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention.员工参与工作场所坐立桌干预的生活体验述评:为何要站立?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9.
4
Desk-based workers' perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: a qualitative analysis of the Stand@Work study.坐姿工作者使用坐立交替工作站的观点:Stand@Work 研究的定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 25;14:752. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-752.
5
Effects of an "Active-Workstation" Cluster RCT on Daily Waking Physical Behaviors.“主动式工作站”群组 RCT 对日常清醒时身体活动的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jul 1;53(7):1434-1445. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002594.
6
Computer-based Prompt's impact on postural variability and sit-stand desk usage behavior; a cluster randomized control trial.基于计算机的提示对姿势变异性和坐立办公桌使用行为的影响:一项聚类随机对照试验。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.久坐办公族选择了哪些策略来减少久坐时间,这些策略效果如何?一项整群随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 12;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0731-z.
8
Impact of Sit-to-Stand and Treadmill Desks on Patterns of Daily Waking Physical Behaviors Among Overweight and Obese Seated Office Workers: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.坐姿与跑步机办公桌对超重和肥胖久坐办公人员日常清醒活动行为模式的影响:集群随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 16;25:e43018. doi: 10.2196/43018.
9
Sit-stand desks in call centres: associations of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior.呼叫中心的坐立两用办公桌:使用情况与人体工程学意识与久坐行为的关联。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Jul;44(4):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
10
Effects of a Workplace Sit-Stand Desk Intervention on Health and Productivity.工作场所坐立办公桌干预对健康和生产力的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11604. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111604.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the impacts of posture changes on office worker productivity: an exploratory study using effective computer interactions as a real-time indicator.量化姿势变化对办公人员生产力的影响:一项使用有效电脑交互作为实时指标的探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):2198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17100-w.
2
Factors Influencing Motivation to Perform Mental and Physical Tasks During the Initial Lockdown Period of the COVID-19.新冠疫情首次封锁期间影响执行脑力和体力任务动机的因素
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Dec 1;15(5):1600-1615. doi: 10.70252/HEFP2784. eCollection 2022.
3
Shared Autonomy to Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Sit-Stand Desk Users in the United States and India: Web-Based Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Body weight homeostat that regulates fat mass independently of leptin in rats and mice.调节大鼠和小鼠脂肪量而不依赖于瘦素的体重稳态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 9;115(2):427-432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715687114. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
Sedentary bout durations and metabolic syndrome among working adults: a prospective cohort study.在职成年人的久坐时长与代谢综合征:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 26;16(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3570-3.
3
Frequent interruptions of sedentary time modulates contraction- and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake pathways in muscle: Ancillary analysis from randomized clinical trials.
美国和印度使用坐站两用办公桌人群中通过共享自主权来减少久坐行为:基于网络的研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 9;6(11):e35447. doi: 10.2196/35447.
4
Impact of workplace displacement during a natural disaster on computer performance metrics: A 2-year interrupted time series analysis.自然灾害期间工作场所转移对计算机性能指标的影响:一项为期2年的中断时间序列分析。
Work. 2022;71(2):465-470. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210707.
5
The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations.用户和非用户视角:长期使用坐站工作站的办公人员的体验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236582. eCollection 2020.
6
Natural Patterns of Sitting, Standing and Stepping During and Outside Work-Differences between Habitual Users and Non-Users of Sit-Stand Workstations.自然坐姿、站姿和步态习惯:使用与不使用坐站交替式工作站人群的区别
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;17(11):4075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114075.
7
Stand-Biased Desk Intervention on Sleep Quality of High School Students: A Pilot Study Using Tri-Axial Accelerometery.基于站立的课桌干预对高中生睡眠质量的影响:使用三轴加速度计的初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):37. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010037.
8
Smart Software Can Increase Sit-Stand Desk Transitions During Active Computer Use.智能软件可增加主动使用计算机时的坐站切换次数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 9;16(13):2438. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132438.
频繁中断久坐时间可调节肌肉中收缩和胰岛素刺激的葡萄糖摄取途径:来自随机临床试验的辅助分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 24;6:32044. doi: 10.1038/srep32044.
4
Stand-Biased Versus Seated Classrooms and Childhood Obesity: A Randomized Experiment in Texas.站立式课堂与坐式课堂对比及儿童肥胖问题:德克萨斯州的一项随机试验
Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1849-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303323. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
5
A novel approach for measuring energy expenditure of a single sit-to-stand movement.一种测量单次坐立运动能量消耗的新方法。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):997-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3355-5. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
6
Are temporal patterns of sitting associated with obesity among blue-collar workers? A cross sectional study using accelerometers.蓝领工人的久坐时间模式与肥胖有关吗?一项使用加速度计的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 13;16:148. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2803-9.
7
What is the metabolic and energy cost of sitting, standing and sit/stand transitions?坐着、站立以及坐立转换的代谢和能量消耗是多少?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Feb;116(2):263-73. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3279-5.
8
The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity.久坐的办公环境:改善健康和提高生产力的专家观点。
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;49(21):1357-62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Repetitive daily point of choice prompts and occupational sit-stand transfers, concentration and neuromuscular performance in office workers: an RCT.重复性日常选择点提示与办公室职员的职业坐立转换、注意力及神经肌肉表现:一项随机对照试验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 20;12(4):4340-53. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404340.
10
Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial.使用坐站式工作站减少上班族的久坐时间:一项随机交叉试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun 25;11(7):6653-65. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110706653.