Hu Xiaoli, Liu Hailing, Ye Miaomiao, Zhu Xueqiong
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000 Zhejiang China.
Cancer Cell Int. 2018 Oct 3;18:152. doi: 10.1186/s12935-018-0647-3. eCollection 2018.
Several epidemiological researches have indicated that microvessel density (MVD), reflecting angiogenesis, was a negatively prognostic factor of cervical cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between microvessel density and the survival probability of patients with cervical cancer.
There was a comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases up to August 31, 2017. Based on a fixed-effects or random-effects model, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from researches on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
Totally, we included 13 observational researches, involving 1097 patients with cervical cancer. The results showed that high level of microvessel density was negatively correlated with OS (HR = 1.79, 95% CIs 1.31-2.44, = 60.7%, = 0.003) and DFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CIs 1.13-1.80, = 0%, = 0.423) of cervical cancer patients. In subgroup analysis, high counts of MVD were significantly associated with a poor survival (including OS and DFS) of the patients detected by anti-factor VIII antibodies or in European origin.
The present meta-analysis indicated that survival with high level of MVD was significant poorer than with low MVD in cervical cancer patient. Standardization of MVD assessment is needed.
多项流行病学研究表明,反映血管生成的微血管密度(MVD)是宫颈癌的不良预后因素。然而,结果并不一致。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估微血管密度与宫颈癌患者生存概率之间的关联。
全面检索截至2017年8月31日的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库。基于固定效应或随机效应模型,从总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的研究中计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
我们共纳入13项观察性研究,涉及1097例宫颈癌患者。结果显示,高微血管密度水平与宫颈癌患者的总生存(HR = 1.79,95%CI 1.31 - 2.44,I² = 60.7%,P = 0.003)和无病生存(HR = 1.47,95%CI 1.13 - 1.80,I² = 0%,P = 0.423)呈负相关。在亚组分析中,高微血管密度计数与抗因子VIII抗体检测或欧洲来源患者的不良生存(包括总生存和无病生存)显著相关。
本荟萃分析表明,宫颈癌患者中高微血管密度水平的生存情况显著差于低微血管密度者。需要对微血管密度评估进行标准化。