Department of Biology, Colorado State University, 200 West Lake Street, 1878 Biology, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, U.S.A.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology & One Health Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2019 Jun;33(3):590-600. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13234. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Clearance and perturbation of Amazonian forests are one of the greatest threats to tropical biodiversity conservation of our times. A better understanding of how soil communities respond to Amazonian deforestation is crucially needed to inform policy interventions that effectively protect biodiversity and the essential ecosystem services it provides. We assessed the impact of deforestation and ecosystem conversion to arable land on Amazonian soil biodiversity through a meta-analysis. We analyzed 274 pairwise comparisons of soil biodiversity in Amazonian primary forests and sites under different stages of deforestation and land-use conversion: disturbed (wildfire and selective logging) and slash-and-burnt forests, pastures, and cropping systems. Overall, 60% and 51% of responses of soil macrofauna and microbial community attributes (i.e., abundance, biomass, richness, and diversity indexes) to deforestation were negative, respectively. We found few studies on mesofauna (e.g., microarthropods) and microfauna (e.g., protozoa and nematodes), so those groups could not be analyzed. Macrofauna abundance and biomass were more vulnerable to the displacement of forests by pastures than by agricultural fields, whereas microbes showed the opposite pattern. Effects of Amazonian deforestation on macrofauna were more detrimental at sites with mean annual precipitation >1900 mm, and higher losses of microbes occurred in highly acidic soils (pH < 4.5). Limited geographic coverage, omission of meso- and microfauna, and low taxonomic resolution were main factors impairing generalizations from the data set. Few studies assessed the impacts of within-forest disturbance (wildfires and selective logging) on soil species in Amazonia, where logging operations rapidly expand across public lands and more frequent severe dry seasons are increasing the prevalence of wildfires.
清除和扰乱亚马逊森林是当今对热带生物多样性保护的最大威胁之一。为了有效保护生物多样性及其提供的基本生态系统服务,迫切需要更好地了解土壤群落如何应对亚马逊森林砍伐。我们通过荟萃分析评估了森林砍伐和生态系统转换为耕地对亚马逊土壤生物多样性的影响。我们分析了 274 对亚马逊原始森林和不同阶段森林砍伐和土地利用转换(野火和选择性采伐、刀耕火种林、牧场和耕作系统)下土壤生物多样性的比较。总体而言,土壤大型动物和微生物群落属性(即丰度、生物量、丰富度和多样性指数)对森林砍伐的响应有 60%和 51%为负面。我们发现关于中型动物(如微节肢动物)和小型动物(如原生动物和线虫)的研究很少,因此无法对这些类群进行分析。大型动物的丰度和生物量更容易受到牧场对森林的取代,而不是农业用地的取代,而微生物则呈现相反的模式。亚马逊森林砍伐对大型动物的影响在年平均降水量大于 1900 毫米的地区更为不利,而在酸性较强的土壤(pH<4.5)中微生物的损失更大。地理覆盖范围有限、中型和小型动物被忽略以及分类分辨率低是影响数据集概括的主要因素。很少有研究评估亚马逊森林内干扰(野火和选择性采伐)对土壤物种的影响,而在那里,采伐作业在公共土地上迅速扩展,更频繁的严重旱季正在增加野火的发生率。