Batchvarov Velislav N
Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Eur Cardiol. 2014 Dec;9(2):82-87. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2014.9.2.82.
The Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a hereditary arrhythmic syndrome manifesting as syncope or sudden cardiac death (SCD) in individuals without overt structural heart disease. Currently, its diagnosis is mainly based on the presence of a spontaneous or Na+-channel blocker induced so-called "type 1" Brugada electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern typically seen in leads V1 and V2 recorded from the 4th to 2nd intercostal spaces. Presently the main unresolved clinical problem in the BrS is the identification of patients at high risk of SCD who need implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Current guidelines recommend ICD implantation only in patients with spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern and either history of aborted cardiac arrest or documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (class I) or syncope of arrhythmic origin (class IIa) because they are at high risk of recurrent arrhythmias. However, the majority of BrS patients are asymptomatic when diagnosed and have generally low risk (0.5 % annually or lower) and therefore are not indicated for ICD. Most of SCD victims in the BrS have had no symptoms prior to the fatal event and therefore were not protected with an ICD. Currently there are no reliable methods to identify these potential victims of SCD. Although some ECG markers such as QRS fragmentation and infero-lateral early repolarisation have been demonstrated to signify increased arrhythmic risk their value still needs to be confirmed in large prospective studies. Novel risk assessment strategies need to be developed based on computerised quantitative ECG analysis of large digital ECG databases in patients with BrS and their relatives, and combined assessment of the most important factors of ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
Brugada综合征(BrS)是一种遗传性心律失常综合征,在无明显结构性心脏病的个体中表现为晕厥或心源性猝死(SCD)。目前,其诊断主要基于自发出现或钠通道阻滞剂诱发的所谓“1型”Brugada心电图(ECG)模式,该模式通常见于从第4至第2肋间记录的V1和V2导联。目前,BrS中尚未解决的主要临床问题是识别需要植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的SCD高危患者。当前指南仅推荐在具有自发1型ECG模式且有心脏骤停未遂史或记录到的持续性室性心动过速(I类)或心律失常性晕厥(IIa类)的患者中植入ICD,因为他们有较高的心律失常复发风险。然而,大多数BrS患者在诊断时无症状,总体风险较低(每年0.5%或更低),因此不适合植入ICD。BrS中大多数SCD受害者在致命事件发生前没有症状,因此未受到ICD的保护。目前尚无可靠方法识别这些潜在的SCD受害者。尽管一些ECG标志物如QRS波碎裂和下侧壁早期复极已被证明表明心律失常风险增加,但其价值仍需在大型前瞻性研究中得到证实。需要基于对BrS患者及其亲属大型数字ECG数据库的计算机化定量ECG分析以及对室性心律失常发生最重要因素的综合评估来制定新的风险评估策略。