• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Big-data and machine learning to revamp computational toxicology and its use in risk assessment.大数据与机器学习助力革新计算毒理学及其在风险评估中的应用。
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2018 May 1;7(5):732-744. doi: 10.1039/c8tx00051d. eCollection 2018 Sep 1.
2
Computational approaches to chemical hazard assessment.计算方法在化学危害评估中的应用。
ALTEX. 2017;34(4):459-478. doi: 10.14573/altex.1710141.
3
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.机器学习和人工智能在毒理学科学中的应用。
Toxicol Sci. 2022 Aug 25;189(1):7-19. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac075.
4
Machine Learning of Toxicological Big Data Enables Read-Across Structure Activity Relationships (RASAR) Outperforming Animal Test Reproducibility.毒理学大数据的机器学习可实现优于动物测试重现性的读交叉结构活性关系 (RASAR)。
Toxicol Sci. 2018 Sep 1;165(1):198-212. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy152.
5
Understanding and overcoming the technical challenges in using in silico predictions in regulatory decisions of complex toxicological endpoints - A pesticide perspective for regulatory toxicologists with a focus on machine learning models.理解和克服在使用计算机预测方法进行复杂毒理学终点的监管决策中的技术挑战 - 以监管毒理学家的视角关注机器学习模型,以农药为例。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;137:105311. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105311. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
6
Progress in computational toxicology.计算毒理学的进展。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2014 Mar-Apr;69(2):115-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
7
Advancing Computational Toxicology by Interpretable Machine Learning.通过可解释机器学习推进计算毒理学
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Nov 21;57(46):17690-17706. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00653. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Predictive Big Data Analytics: A Study of Parkinson's Disease Using Large, Complex, Heterogeneous, Incongruent, Multi-Source and Incomplete Observations.预测性大数据分析:一项使用大规模、复杂、异构、不一致、多源和不完整观测数据对帕金森病的研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 5;11(8):e0157077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157077. eCollection 2016.
9
Machine learning and traditional QSAR modeling methods: a case study of known PXR activators.机器学习和传统 QSAR 建模方法:已知 PXR 激活剂的案例研究。
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024 Jan-Feb;42(2):903-917. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2196701. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
10
Guidance for good practice in the application of machine learning in development of toxicological quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs).机器学习在毒理学定量构效关系(QSARs)开发中的应用良好实践指南。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0282924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282924. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
ToxACoL: an endpoint-aware and task-focused compound representation learning paradigm for acute toxicity assessment.ToxACoL:一种用于急性毒性评估的、以终点为导向且专注于任务的化合物表示学习范式。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5992. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60989-7.
2
MONSTROUS: a web-based chemical-transporter interaction profiler.MONSTROUS:一个基于网络的化学转运体相互作用分析工具。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1498945. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1498945. eCollection 2025.
3
Overview of Computational Toxicology Methods Applied in Drug and Green Chemical Discovery.应用于药物和绿色化学发现的计算毒理学方法概述。
J Xenobiot. 2024 Dec 4;14(4):1901-1918. doi: 10.3390/jox14040101.
4
FAIR assessment of nanosafety data reusability with community standards.用社区标准实现纳米安全性数据再利用的 FAIR 评估。
Sci Data. 2024 May 16;11(1):503. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03324-x.
5
Artificial intelligence (AI)-it's the end of the tox as we know it (and I feel fine).人工智能(AI)——这是我们所知道的毒理学的终结(我感觉很好)。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Mar;98(3):735-754. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03666-2. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
6
Big Question to Developing Solutions: A Decade of Progress in the Development of Aquatic New Approach Methodologies from 2012 to 2022.重大问题解决方案:2012 年至 2022 年,水生新方法学发展十年进展。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024 Mar;43(3):559-574. doi: 10.1002/etc.5578. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Machine learning and artificial intelligence in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.机器学习和人工智能在基于生理学的药代动力学建模中的应用。
Toxicol Sci. 2023 Jan 31;191(1):1-14. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac101.
8
Automating Predictive Toxicology Using ComptoxAI.使用 ComptoxAI 实现预测毒理学自动化。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2022 Aug 15;35(8):1370-1382. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00074. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
Replacement of animal testing by integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA): a call for in vivitrosi.用综合测试和评估方法(IATA)替代动物测试:呼吁在体外研究。
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Jul;96(7):1935-1950. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03299-x. Epub 2022 May 3.
10
Developments in high-resolution mass spectrometric analyses of new psychoactive substances.新型精神活性物质的高分辨率质谱分析进展。
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Apr;96(4):949-967. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03224-2. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Green Toxicology-Know Early About and Avoid Toxic Product Liabilities.绿色毒理学——尽早了解并避免有毒产品责任。
Toxicol Sci. 2018 Feb 1;161(2):285-289. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx243.
2
Computational approaches to chemical hazard assessment.计算方法在化学危害评估中的应用。
ALTEX. 2017;34(4):459-478. doi: 10.14573/altex.1710141.
3
Thresholds of Toxicological Concern - Setting a threshold for testing below which there is little concern.毒理学关注阈值——设定一个测试阈值,低于该阈值则几乎无需担忧。
ALTEX. 2017;34(3):331-351. doi: 10.14573/altex.1707011.
4
The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits.大鼠和家兔产前发育毒性的毒理学关注阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:157-172. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology.毒理学系统评价入门
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Jul;91(7):2551-2575. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3. Epub 2017 May 13.
6
Green Toxicology: a strategy for sustainable chemical and material development.绿色毒理学:可持续化学与材料开发策略
Environ Sci Eur. 2017;29(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12302-017-0115-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Opinion versus evidence for the need to move away from animal testing.关于摆脱动物实验必要性的观点与证据
ALTEX. 2017;34(2):193-200. doi: 10.14573/altex.1703291.
8
CIIPro: a new read-across portal to fill data gaps using public large-scale chemical and biological data.CIIPro:一个新的阅读交叉门户,利用公共大规模化学和生物数据填补数据空白。
Bioinformatics. 2017 Feb 1;33(3):464-466. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw640.
9
The need for strategic development of safety sciences.安全科学的战略发展需求。
ALTEX. 2017;34(1):3-21. doi: 10.14573/altex.1701031.
10
Alternative acute oral toxicity assessment under REACH based on sub-acute toxicity values.基于亚急性毒性值的《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》下的替代急性经口毒性评估
ALTEX. 2017;34(3):353-361. doi: 10.14573/altex.1609121. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

大数据与机器学习助力革新计算毒理学及其在风险评估中的应用。

Big-data and machine learning to revamp computational toxicology and its use in risk assessment.

作者信息

Luechtefeld Thomas, Rowlands Craig, Hartung Thomas

机构信息

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , 615 N. Wolfe Street , Baltimore , MD 21205 , USA . Email:

Underwriters Laboratories (UL) , UL Product Supply Chain Intelligence , 333 Pfingsten Road , Northbrook , IL 60062 , USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Res (Camb). 2018 May 1;7(5):732-744. doi: 10.1039/c8tx00051d. eCollection 2018 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1039/c8tx00051d
PMID:30310652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6116175/
Abstract

The creation of large toxicological databases and advances in machine-learning techniques have empowered computational approaches in toxicology. Work with these large databases based on regulatory data has allowed reproducibility assessment of animal models, which highlight weaknesses in traditional methods. This should lower the bars for the introduction of new approaches and represents a benchmark that is achievable for any alternative method validated against these methods. Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships (QSAR) models for skin sensitization, eye irritation, and other human health hazards based on these big databases, however, also have made apparent some of the challenges facing computational modeling, including validation challenges, model interpretation issues, and model selection issues. A first implementation of machine learning-based predictions termed REACH achieved unprecedented sensitivities of >80% with specificities >70% in predicting the six most common acute and topical hazards covering about two thirds of the chemical universe. While this is awaiting formal validation, it demonstrates the new quality introduced by big data and modern data-mining technologies. The rapid increase in the diversity and number of computational models, as well as the data they are based on, create challenges and opportunities for the use of computational methods.

摘要

大型毒理学数据库的创建以及机器学习技术的进步,推动了毒理学领域的计算方法发展。基于监管数据处理这些大型数据库,使得对动物模型进行可重复性评估成为可能,这凸显了传统方法的不足之处。这应该会降低引入新方法的门槛,并代表了任何与这些方法验证过的替代方法都能达到的一个基准。然而,基于这些大型数据库建立的用于皮肤致敏、眼刺激及其他人类健康危害的定量构效关系(QSAR)模型,也凸显了计算建模面临的一些挑战,包括验证挑战、模型解释问题和模型选择问题。一种名为REACH的基于机器学习预测的首次应用,在预测涵盖约三分之二化学物质的六种最常见急性和局部危害时,实现了前所未有的灵敏度>80%、特异性>70%。虽然这有待正式验证,但它展示了大数据和现代数据挖掘技术带来的新质量。计算模型及其所基于的数据在多样性和数量上的快速增长,给计算方法的使用带来了挑战和机遇。