J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Oct;16(10):1209-1215. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7044.
Tumor board conferences (TBCs) are used by oncologic specialists to review patient cases, exchange knowledge, and discuss options for cancer management. These multidisciplinary meetings are often a cornerstone of treatment at leading cancer centers and are required for accreditation by certain groups, such as the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer. Little is known regarding skin cancer TBCs. The objective of this study was to characterize the structure, function, and impact of existing skin cancer TBCs in the United States. A cross-sectional online survey was administered to physician leaders of skin cancer TBCs at NCI-designated Comprehensive and Clinical Cancer Centers. Of the 59 centers successfully contacted, 14 (24%) reported not having a conference where skin cancer cases were discussed, and 45 (76%) identified 53 physician leaders. A total of 38 physicians (72%) completed the survey. Half of the meeting leaders were medical and/or surgical oncologists, and dermatologists led one-third of meetings. TBCs had a moderate to significant impact on patient care according to 97% of respondents. All respondents indicated that the meetings enhanced communication among physicians and provided an opportunity for involved specialists and professionals to discuss cases. The most frequently cited barrier to organizing TBCs was determining a common available date and time for attendees (62%). The most common suggestion for improvement was to increase attendance, specialists, and/or motivation. Results showed overall consistency in meeting structure but variability in function, which may be a reflection of institutional resources and investment in the conference. Future directions include defining metrics to evaluate changes in diagnosis or management plan after tumor board discussion, attendance, clinical trial enrollment, and cost analysis. Results of this survey may aid other institutions striving to develop and refine skin cancer TBCs.
肿瘤委员会会议(TBCs)被肿瘤专家用于审查患者病例、交流知识并讨论癌症管理方案。这些多学科会议通常是领先癌症中心治疗的基石,并且是某些组织(如美国外科医师学会癌症委员会)认证所必需的。关于皮肤癌 TBCs 的了解甚少。本研究的目的是描述美国现有的皮肤癌 TBC 的结构、功能和影响。
我们对 NCI 指定的综合癌症中心和临床癌症中心的皮肤癌 TBC 医师负责人进行了横断面在线调查。在成功联系的 59 个中心中,有 14 个(24%)报告没有讨论皮肤癌病例的会议,45 个(76%)确定了 53 位医师负责人。共有 38 名医生(72%)完成了调查。半数会议负责人是医学和/或外科肿瘤学家,三分之一的会议由皮肤科医生领导。根据 97%的受访者,TBCs 对患者护理有中度至重大影响。所有受访者都表示,会议加强了医生之间的沟通,并为参与的专家和专业人员提供了讨论病例的机会。组织 TBC 的最常见障碍是为与会者确定一个共同的可用日期和时间(62%)。最常见的改进建议是增加与会者、专家和/或积极性。
结果显示会议结构总体上具有一致性,但功能上存在差异,这可能反映了机构资源和对会议的投资。未来的方向包括定义评估肿瘤委员会讨论后诊断或管理计划变化、出勤率、临床试验参与率和成本分析的指标。这项调查的结果可能有助于其他努力开发和完善皮肤癌 TBC 的机构。