• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Mega Conversion Program from Kerosene to LPG in Indonesia: lessons learned and recommendations for future clean cooking energy expansion.印度尼西亚从煤油到液化石油气的大规模转换计划:经验教训及对未来清洁烹饪能源扩展的建议。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Household Energy Interventions and Health and Finances in Haryana, India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis印度哈里亚纳邦的家庭能源干预措施与健康和财务状况:一项扩展的成本效益分析
3
Cooking Fuels in Lagos, Nigeria: Factors Associated with Household Choice of Kerosene or Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).尼日利亚拉各斯的烹饪燃料:与家庭选择煤油或液化石油气(LPG)相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 31;15(4):641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040641.
4
Government Policy, Clean Fuel Access, and Persistent Fuel Stacking in Ecuador.厄瓜多尔的政府政策、清洁燃料获取与持续的燃料堆积
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Increased risk of respiratory illness associated with kerosene fuel use among women and children in urban Bangalore, India.印度班加罗尔市区妇女和儿童因使用煤油燃料而患呼吸道疾病的风险增加。
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Feb;72(2):114-22. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102472. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
Household Determinants of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a Cooking Fuel in South West Cameroon.喀麦隆西南部家庭将液化石油气用作烹饪燃料的决定因素
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Exploring the impact of a liquefied petroleum gas intervention on time use in rural Peru: A mixed methods study on perceptions, use, and implications of time savings.探讨液化石油气干预对秘鲁农村时间利用的影响:一项关于节省时间的看法、使用和影响的混合方法研究。
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:105932. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105932. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Adoption and sustained use of cleaner cooking fuels in rural India: a case control study protocol to understand household, network, and organizational drivers.印度农村地区清洁烹饪燃料的采用与持续使用:一项了解家庭、网络及组织驱动因素的病例对照研究方案
Arch Public Health. 2017 Dec 14;75:70. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0244-2. eCollection 2017.
10
An evaluation of the Fondo de Inclusión Social Energético program to promote access to liquefied petroleum gas in Peru.对秘鲁促进获得液化石油气的社会能源包容基金项目的评估。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors of acute respiratory infection and diarrhea among children under 5 years old in low-middle wealth household, Indonesia.印度尼西亚中低收入家庭5岁以下儿童急性呼吸道感染和腹泻的患病率及风险因素
Infect Dis Poverty. 2025 Feb 27;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40249-025-01286-9.
2
The truth about co-benefits: a multidimensional feasibility assessment for thailand and beyond.协同效益的真相:泰国及其他地区的多维可行性评估
Environ Res Commun. 2025 Feb 1;7(2):025009. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/adae5e. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Acceptability of improved cook stoves-a scoping review of the literature.改良炉灶的可接受性——文献综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):e0004042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004042. eCollection 2025.
4
Clearing the Air to Address Pollution's Cardiovascular Health Crisis.清除空气,应对污染对心血管健康的危机。
Glob Heart. 2024 Oct 30;19(1):82. doi: 10.5334/gh.1364. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of the Local Environment and Nutritional Status on the Incidence of Acute Respiratory Infections Among Children Under 5 Years Old in Indonesia.印度尼西亚当地环境和营养状况对 5 岁以下儿童急性呼吸道感染发病率的影响。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Sep;57(5):461-470. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.246. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
Impact of randomly assigned "pay-as-you-go" liquefied petroleum gas prices on energy use for cooking: Experimental pilot evidence from rural Rwanda.随机分配的“现用现付”液化石油气价格对烹饪能源使用的影响:来自卢旺达农村的实验性试点证据。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2024 Jun;80. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101455. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
Household Air Pollution Interventions to Improve Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.改善低收入和中等收入国家健康状况的家庭空气污染干预措施:美国胸科学会官方研究声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 15;209(8):909-927. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0398ST.
8
Multidimensional energy poverty: A study of its measurement, decomposition, and determinants in Indonesia.多维能源贫困:印度尼西亚的测量、分解及决定因素研究
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 23;10(3):e24135. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24135. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
9
Revisiting the Energy-Happiness Paradox: A Quasi-Experimental Evidence of Electricity Access in Indonesia.重新审视能源-幸福悖论:印度尼西亚电力接入的准实验证据
J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(7):3549-3576. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00567-6. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
10
Drivers of household demand for cooking energy: A case of Central Uganda.家庭烹饪能源需求的驱动因素:以乌干达中部为例。
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 15;8(3):e09118. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09118. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Performance of Household Liquefied Petroleum Gas Cookstoves.评估家用液化石油气炊具的性能。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jan 16;52(2):904-915. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05155. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
2
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响:RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.

印度尼西亚从煤油到液化石油气的大规模转换计划:经验教训及对未来清洁烹饪能源扩展的建议。

The Mega Conversion Program from Kerosene to LPG in Indonesia: lessons learned and recommendations for future clean cooking energy expansion.

作者信息

Thoday Katharine, Benjamin Precious, Gan Meixi, Puzzolo Elisa

机构信息

Regeneration Supply Chains, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Clean Air Asia, Manila, Philippines.

出版信息

Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.011
PMID:30333687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6186446/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2007, the Indonesian Government instigated a national program to convert domestic kerosene users to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) for cooking. This was primarily motivated by the rising cost of kerosene subsidies.

OBJECTIVE

To review the national conversion program and LPG scale up by evaluating its impacts, including assessing sustained changes in cooking behaviour and consequent reductions in exposure to household air pollution (HAP).

METHODS AND DATA SOURCES

Searches of peer-review and grey literature in both English and Bahasa Indonesian were conducted and supplemented by interviews with key informants, data from the National Statistics Agency and results from household surveys. The data were extracted and analyzed using an Implementation Science approach.

RESULTS

The main kerosene to LPG conversion phase took place in highly populated kerosene dependent areas between 2007-2012 reaching over 50 million households, approximately two thirds of all households in Indonesia. Since then the drive to expand LPG use has continued at a slower pace, especially in more remote provinces where solid fuel is more widely used. Over 57 million LPG start up kits were distributed as of 2015. Beginning in 2018, the open subsidy for LPG is expected to be replaced by one targeted at lower income households. While the main conversion phase has been highlighted as an example of effective and impressively fast fuel switching at scale, the impact on domestic biomass use remains limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing HAP and the health impacts associated with kerosene and biomass use was never an objective of the program. Consequently, there is limited evidence of impact in this area, and in hindsight, missed opportunities in terms of influencing cooking behavior change among biomass users, who are more at risk.

摘要

背景

2007年,印度尼西亚政府发起了一项全国性计划,将国内煤油用户转换为使用液化石油气(LPG)做饭。这主要是由于煤油补贴成本不断上升。

目的

通过评估其影响来审查全国转换计划和LPG的扩大规模情况,包括评估烹饪行为的持续变化以及随之而来的家庭空气污染(HAP)暴露减少情况。

方法和数据来源

检索了英文和印尼语的同行评审文献和灰色文献,并通过与关键信息提供者的访谈、国家统计局的数据以及家庭调查结果进行补充。使用实施科学方法提取和分析数据。

结果

煤油向LPG的主要转换阶段于2007年至2012年在高度依赖煤油的人口密集地区进行,涉及超过5000万户家庭,约占印度尼西亚所有家庭的三分之二。从那时起,扩大LPG使用的努力以较慢的速度继续进行,特别是在固体燃料使用更为广泛的偏远省份。截至2015年,已分发了超过5700万个LPG启动套件。从2018年开始,LPG的公开补贴预计将被针对低收入家庭的补贴所取代。虽然主要转换阶段被视为大规模有效且快速燃料转换的一个例子,但对国内生物质使用的影响仍然有限。

结论

解决HAP以及与煤油和生物质使用相关的健康影响从来都不是该计划的目标。因此,在这方面影响的证据有限,事后看来,在影响风险更高的生物质用户的烹饪行为改变方面错失了机会。