Yanovskiy Moshe, Shaki Yair Y, Socol Yehoshua
Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, Moscow, Russia.
Dose Response. 2019 Jan 10;17(1):1559325818822602. doi: 10.1177/1559325818822602. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
The linear no-threshold (LNT) model of ionizing radiation-induced cancer assumes that every increment of radiation dose, no matter how small, constitutes an increased cancer risk for humans. Linear no-threshold is presently the most widely applied model for radiation risk assessment. As such, it imposes very heavy burden on the society in both economic and human terms. This model, which was adopted in late 1950s in the wake of massive government investments in science, is controversial and raises important ethical issues. This article identifies 2 issues often missed: scientists usurping the role of policy makers and seeking funding and power. These issues should be considered together with the scientific controversy raging over the validity of the LNT model and the multiple other ethical issues regarding its ongoing use.
电离辐射诱发癌症的线性无阈(LNT)模型假定,无论辐射剂量的增量多么微小,都会增加人类患癌风险。线性无阈模型目前是辐射风险评估中应用最广泛的模型。因此,它在经济和人力方面给社会带来了沉重负担。该模型于20世纪50年代末在政府对科学进行大量投资之后被采用,存在争议并引发了重要的伦理问题。本文指出了两个常被忽视的问题:科学家篡夺政策制定者的角色以及追求资金和权力。这些问题应与围绕LNT模型有效性的激烈科学争议以及关于其持续使用的其他多个伦理问题一并加以考虑。