• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人阿片类物质使用障碍治疗中的患者参与、治疗偏好与共同决策:一项范围综述方案

Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Marshall Tyler, Kinnard Elizabeth N, Hancock Myles, King-Jones Susanne, Olson Karin, Abba-Aji Adam, Rittenbach Katherine, Vohra Sunita

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology, University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022267.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022267
PMID:30337310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6196846/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is characterised by the fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual as a problematic pattern of opioid use (eg, fentanyl, heroin, oxycodone) that leads to clinically significant impairment. OUD diagnoses have risen substantially over the last decade, and treatment services have struggled to meet the demand. Evidence suggests when patients with chronic illnesses are matched with their treatment preferences and engaged in shared decision-making (SDM), health outcomes may improve. However, it is not known whether SDM could impact outcomes in specific substance use disorders such as OUD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A scoping review will be conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework and by recommendations from Levac . The search strategy was developed to retrieve relevant publications from database inception and June 2017. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database for Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews and reference lists of relevant articles and Google Scholar will be searched. Included studies must be composed of adults with a diagnosis of OUD, and investigate SDM or its constituent components. Experimental, quasi-experimental, qualitative, case-control, cohort studies and cross-sectional surveys will be included. Articles will be screened for final eligibility according to title and abstract, and then by full text. Two independent reviewers will screen excluded articles at each stage. A consultation phase with expert clinicians and policy-makers will be added to set the scope of the work, refine research questions, review the search strategy and identify additional relevant literature. Results will summarise whether SDM impacts health and patient-centred outcomes in OUD.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Scoping review methodology is considered secondary analysis and does not require ethics approval. The final review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, disseminated at relevant academic conferences and will be shared with policy-makers, patients and clinicians.

摘要

引言

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版将阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)定义为一种有问题的阿片类物质使用模式(例如,芬太尼、海洛因、羟考酮),会导致临床上的显著损害。在过去十年中,OUD的诊断数量大幅上升,治疗服务难以满足需求。有证据表明,当慢性病患者的治疗偏好得到匹配,并参与共同决策(SDM)时,健康结果可能会改善。然而,尚不清楚SDM是否会影响诸如OUD等特定物质使用障碍的治疗结果。

方法与分析

将根据阿克西和奥马利的框架以及莱瓦克的建议进行一项范围综述。制定检索策略以检索自数据库建立至2017年6月的相关出版物。将检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Cochrane对照试验数据库、Cochrane系统评价数据库以及相关文章的参考文献列表和谷歌学术。纳入的研究必须由诊断为OUD的成年人组成,并调查SDM或其组成部分。将纳入实验性、准实验性、定性、病例对照、队列研究和横断面调查。将根据标题和摘要,然后根据全文筛选文章以确定最终的合格性。两名独立的评审员将在每个阶段筛选排除的文章。将增加一个与专家临床医生和政策制定者的咨询阶段,以确定工作范围、完善研究问题、审查检索策略并识别其他相关文献。结果将总结SDM是否会影响OUD患者的健康和以患者为中心的结果。

伦理与传播

范围综述方法被视为二次分析,不需要伦理批准。最终综述将提交给同行评审期刊,在相关学术会议上传播,并将与政策制定者、患者和临床医生分享。

相似文献

1
Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol.成人阿片类物质使用障碍治疗中的患者参与、治疗偏好与共同决策:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022267.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Treatment options and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder: A scoping review.阿片类物质使用障碍治疗中的治疗选择与共同决策:一项范围综述
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Apr;135:108646. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108646. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.手术中的共同决策:患者和外科医生偏好的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0.
7
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
8
Quality of life and relapse of Opioid Use Disorder: a scoping review protocol.生活质量与阿片类使用障碍复发:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e069778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069778.
9
Scoping review protocol: the use of telemedicine in providing opioid agonist treatment and related psychosocial supports.范围综述方案:远程医疗在提供阿片类激动剂治疗和相关心理社会支持中的应用。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):e040556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040556.
10
"It's within your own power": shared decision-making to support transitions to buprenorphine.“这掌握在你自己手中”:支持向丁丙诺啡过渡的共同决策。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00555-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Fibromyalgia is associated with increased odds of prior pain-precipitated relapse among non-treatment-seeking individuals with opioid use disorder.纤维肌痛与非治疗寻求者中阿片类药物使用障碍患者先前疼痛诱发复发的几率增加有关。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2422050. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2422050. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Evaluating preferences for medication formulation and treatment model among people who use opioids non-medically: A web-based cross-sectional study.评估非医疗用途阿片类药物使用者对药物配方和治疗模式的偏好:一项基于网络的横断面研究。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug;163:209383. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209383. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Male patients' preferences for opioid use treatment programs.男性患者对阿片类药物使用治疗方案的偏好。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04939-x.
4
Understanding patients' and significant others' preferences on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia: An integrative review.理解患者及其重要他人对启动痴呆诊断轨迹的偏好:综合评价。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 May;27(5):862-875. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084505. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
"You have to take this medication, but then you get punished for taking it:" lack of agency, choice, and fear of medications to treat opioid use disorder across the perinatal period.“你必须服用这种药物,但服用它却会受到惩罚”:围产期治疗阿片类药物使用障碍时缺乏自主性、选择权以及对药物的恐惧。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Aug;139:108765. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108765. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
6
How People with Lived Experiences of Substance Use Understand and Experience User Involvement in Substance Use Care: A Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.有物质使用经历的人如何理解和体验物质使用护理中的用户参与:定性研究的综合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):10219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910219.
7
Comparing the feasibility of four web-based recruitment strategies to evaluate the treatment preferences of rural and urban adults who misuse non-prescribed opioids.比较四种基于网络的招募策略的可行性,以评估农村和城市滥用非处方类阿片类药物的成年人的治疗偏好。
Prev Med. 2021 Nov;152(Pt 2):106783. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106783. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Perceptions and preferences for long-acting injectable and implantable medications in comparison to short-acting medications for opioid use disorders.与用于阿片类物质使用障碍的短效药物相比,对长效注射剂和植入式药物的认知及偏好。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Apr;111:54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic Distribution of Providers With a DEA Waiver to Prescribe Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A 5-Year Update.持 DEA 豁免权开具丁丙诺啡用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的提供者的地理分布:5 年更新。
J Rural Health. 2019 Jan;35(1):108-112. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12307. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: a systematic review.长期护理机构中痴呆症患者的共同决策:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 9;8(6):e018977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018977.
3
Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline.阿片类物质使用障碍的管理:一项国家临床实践指南。
CMAJ. 2018 Mar 5;190(9):E247-E257. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170958.
4
Opioid Crisis: No Easy Fix to Its Social and Economic Determinants.阿片类危机:社会经济决定因素难以解决。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Feb;108(2):182-186. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304187. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Opioid Dependence.创伤后应激障碍与阿片类药物依赖共病
Cureus. 2017 Sep 3;9(9):e1647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1647.
6
Underlying Factors in Drug Overdose Deaths.药物过量死亡的潜在因素。
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2295-2296. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15971.
7
Action, Not Rhetoric, Needed to Reverse the Opioid Overdose Epidemic.扭转阿片类药物过量流行需要行动,而非言辞。
J Law Med Ethics. 2017 Mar;45(1_suppl):20-23. doi: 10.1177/1073110517703310.
8
The Role of Science in Addressing the Opioid Crisis.科学在应对阿片类药物危机中的作用。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):391-394. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1706626. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Recent Increases in Cocaine-Related Overdose Deaths and the Role of Opioids.近期可卡因相关过量死亡人数的增加及阿片类药物的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Mar;107(3):430-432. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303627.
10
A review: Fentanyl and non-pharmaceutical fentanyls.综述:芬太尼及非药用芬太尼
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Feb 1;171:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 16.