• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏好的性别差异与经济发展和性别平等的关系。

Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Bonn, and Behavior and Inequality Research Institute (briq), 53113 Bonn, Germany.

Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2018 Oct 19;362(6412). doi: 10.1126/science.aas9899.

DOI:10.1126/science.aas9899
PMID:30337384
Abstract

Preferences concerning time, risk, and social interactions systematically shape human behavior and contribute to differential economic and social outcomes between women and men. We present a global investigation of gender differences in six fundamental preferences. Our data consist of measures of willingness to take risks, patience, altruism, positive and negative reciprocity, and trust for 80,000 individuals in 76 representative country samples. Gender differences in preferences were positively related to economic development and gender equality. This finding suggests that greater availability of and gender-equal access to material and social resources favor the manifestation of gender-differentiated preferences across countries.

摘要

人们对于时间、风险和社会互动的偏好会系统地塑造其行为方式,并导致女性和男性在经济和社会成果方面存在差异。我们对六大基本偏好的性别差异进行了全球调查。我们的数据包括 76 个有代表性的国家样本中 8 万名个体对风险承受意愿、耐心程度、利他主义、互惠行为(包括正、负两方面)以及信任的衡量指标。个体的偏好存在性别差异,这与经济发展和性别平等呈正相关。这一发现表明,更多的物质和社会资源的可获得性以及对这些资源的性别平等获取,有利于各国表现出差异化的性别偏好。

相似文献

1
Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality.偏好的性别差异与经济发展和性别平等的关系。
Science. 2018 Oct 19;362(6412). doi: 10.1126/science.aas9899.
2
Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories.跨 53 个国家的人格特质和与性别相关职业偏好的性别差异:对进化和社会环境理论的检验。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Jun;39(3):619-36. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9380-7. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
3
Converging evidence for greater male variability in time, risk, and social preferences.越来越多的证据表明,男性在时间、风险和社会偏好方面的变异性更大。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 8;118(23). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026112118.
4
BMI is not related to altruism, fairness, trust or reciprocity: Experimental evidence from the field and the lab.体重指数与利他主义、公平、信任或互惠无关:来自实地和实验室的实验证据。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Mar 15;156:79-93. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Stepping out of the caveman's shadow: nations' gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.走出穴居人的阴影:国家性别差距预测择偶偏好性别差异程度。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1176-85. doi: 10.1177/0956797612441004. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Gender roles produce divergent economic expectations.性别角色产生不同的经济期望。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008534118.
7
Culture, gender, and the self: variations and impact of social comparison processes.文化、性别与自我:社会比较过程的差异及影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1118-34. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1118.
8
Population and status of women.女性人口与状况
Asia Pac Popul J. 1988 Jun;3(2):3-28.
9
Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in smoking cessation associated with employment and joblessness through young adulthood in the US.在美国,从青年期到成年期,与就业和失业相关的戒烟方面的种族、族裔和性别差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(2):303-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
10
The influence of gender equality policies on gender inequalities in health in Europe.欧洲性别平等政策对健康领域性别不平等的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;117:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Commonly observed sex differences in direct aggression are absent or reversed in sibling contexts.在兄弟姐妹的情境中,常见的直接攻击行为中的性别差异不存在或相反。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 26;4(8):pgaf239. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf239. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Pandemic prevention and personality psychology: Gender differences in preventive health behaviors during COVID-19 and the roles of agreeableness and conscientiousness.大流行预防与人格心理学:COVID-19期间预防性健康行为的性别差异以及宜人性和尽责性的作用。
J Saf Sci Resil. 2022 Mar;3(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
Simpson's gender-equality paradox.
辛普森性别平等悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2422247122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2422247122. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
4
Do all women shy away from competition? Competitive preferences among Dutch and non-Western females in the Netherlands.所有女性都回避竞争吗?荷兰本土女性与荷兰非西方裔女性的竞争偏好。
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0321256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321256. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparative analysis of aesthetic preferences in Chinese freehand paintings among Chinese retired elders beyond gender.中国退休老年人中国画写意审美偏好的性别差异比较分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96353-4.
6
Is gender primacy universal?性别至上是否普遍存在?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 27;121(35):e2401919121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401919121. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures.跨文化肉类消费中自相矛盾的性别效应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62511-3.
8
Visual analysis of trustworthiness studies: based on the Web of Science database.可信度研究的可视化分析:基于科学网数据库。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 24;15:1351425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351425. eCollection 2024.
9
A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox.性别平等悖论的系统评价与新分析
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 May;20(3):503-539. doi: 10.1177/17456916231202685. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
Using Survey Questions to Measure Preferences: Lessons from an Experimental Validation in Kenya.运用调查问卷衡量偏好:来自肯尼亚一项实验验证的经验教训
Eur Econ Rev. 2020 Aug;127. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103493. Epub 2020 Jun 10.