Davidson Emily R W, Thomas Tonya N, Lampert Erika J, Paraiso Marie Fidela R, Ferrando Cecile A
Center for Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western University, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):649-655. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3790-4. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
Hysterectomy can be performed during sacrocolpopexy, but there are limited studies comparing the effect of route of hysterectomy on adverse events. We hypothesized there would be no difference in adverse events or patient-reported outcomes in women who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with either vaginal or supracervical hysterectomy.
This was a retrospective chart review with a cross-sectional survey component sent to all consenting patients. Patients were identified by procedure code for sacrocolpopexy and hysterectomy from January 2005 to June 2016.
Of the 161 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria, 116 underwent supracervical and 45 vaginal hysterectomy. Overall incidence of perioperative adverse events was low. Vaginal hysterectomy cases were faster (276 vs. 324 min, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of postoperative stress incontinence (22 vs. 9%, p = 0.03). Thirty-one (19%) of all subjects had recurrent prolapse; 10 (6%) underwent repeat surgery. Three (1%) subjects had a mesh exposure (no difference between groups), all treated conservatively. Ninety-six (60%) subjects responded to the survey with a median follow-up of 56 (9-134) months. Ninety-one percent (87) of respondents reported being better since surgery, and 91% (87) reported they would choose the surgery again. Twenty-eight percent (27) reported a surgery-related complication including pain, urinary and bowel symptoms; 8% (8) reported evaluation for recurrent prolapse symptoms, all treated conservatively; 4% (4) of respondents reported a mesh exposure.
Incidence of adverse events is low and not different between patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with concurrent supracervical or vaginal hysterectomy. One in three patients report pelvic floor symptoms postoperatively, but long-term satisfaction is high.
骶棘韧带固定术期间可进行子宫切除术,但比较子宫切除途径对不良事件影响的研究有限。我们假设,接受微创骶棘韧带固定术并同时行阴道或次全子宫切除术的女性,在不良事件或患者报告的结局方面无差异。
这是一项回顾性病历审查,并向所有同意参与的患者发送了横断面调查问卷。通过2005年1月至2016年6月期间骶棘韧带固定术和子宫切除术的手术编码识别患者。
在161名符合纳入标准的受试者中,116例行次全子宫切除术,45例行阴道子宫切除术。围手术期不良事件的总体发生率较低。阴道子宫切除术的手术时间更快(276分钟对324分钟,p<0.001),术后压力性尿失禁发生率更高(22%对9%,p=0.03)。所有受试者中有31名(19%)出现复发脱垂;10名(6%)接受了再次手术。3名(1%)受试者出现网片暴露(两组间无差异),均采用保守治疗。96名(60%)受试者回复了调查问卷,中位随访时间为56(9 - 134)个月。91%(87名)受访者表示术后情况更好,91%(87名)表示会再次选择该手术。28%(27名)报告了与手术相关的并发症,包括疼痛、泌尿和肠道症状;8%(8名)报告因复发脱垂症状接受评估,均采用保守治疗;4%(4名)受访者报告出现网片暴露。
接受微创骶棘韧带固定术并同时行次全或阴道子宫切除术的患者,不良事件发生率较低且无差异。三分之一的患者术后报告有盆底症状,但长期满意度较高。