Kim Dae-Won, Her Sung-Ho, Park Ha Wook, Chang Kiyuk, Chung Wook Sung, Seung Ki Bae, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Hyo-Soo, Gwon Hyeon Cheol, Seong In Whan, Hwang Kyung Kuk, Chae Shung Chull, Kim Kwon-Bae, Kim Young Jo, Cha Kwang Soo, Oh Seok Kyu, Chae Jei Keon, Jung Ji-Hoon
Division of Cardiology, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Sep 28;15(9):574-584. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.09.005.
To evaluate the age-related one-year major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events (MACCE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We analyzed the association between age and one-year MACCE after AMI.
A total of 13,104 AMI patients from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institue of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 were classified into four groups according to age (Group I, < 60 years, = 4199; Group II, 60-70 years, = 2577; Group III; 70-80 years, = 2774; Group IV, ≥ 80 years, = 1018). Patients were analyzed for one-year composite of MACCE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, cerebrovascular events) after AMI.
The one-year MACCE in AMI were 3.5% (Group I), 6.3% (Group II), 9.6% (Group III) and 17.6% (Group IV). After adjustment for confounding parameters, the analysis results showed that patients with AMI had incremental risk of one-year MACCE [Group II, adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) = 1.224, 95% CI: 0.965-1.525, = 0.096; Group III, aHR = 1.316, 95% CI: 1.037-1.671, = 0.024; Group IV, aHR = 1.975, 95% CI: 1.500-62.601, < 0.001) compared to Group I. Especially, cardiac death in the composite of primary end point played a major role in this effect (Group II, aHR = 1.335, 95% CI: 0.941-1.895, = 0.106; Group III, aHR = 1.575, 95% CI: 1.122-2.210, = 0.009; Group IV, aHR = 2.803, 95% CI: 1.937-4.054, < 0.001).
Despite advanced techniques and medications for PCI in AMI, age still exerts a powerful influence in clinical outcomes. Careful approaches, even in the modern era of developed cardiology are needed for aged-population in AMI intervention.
评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后与年龄相关的1年主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。我们分析了AMI后年龄与1年MACCE之间的关联。
2011年11月至2015年12月期间,来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-国立卫生研究院(KAMIR-NIH)的13104例AMI患者根据年龄分为四组(I组,<60岁,n = 4199;II组,60-70岁,n = 2577;III组,70-80岁,n = 2774;IV组,≥80岁,n = 1018)。分析患者AMI后1年的MACCE复合事件(心源性死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建、脑血管事件)。
AMI患者的1年MACCE发生率分别为3.5%(I组)、6.3%(II组)、9.6%(III组)和17.6%(IV组)。在对混杂参数进行调整后,分析结果显示,与I组相比,AMI患者发生1年MACCE的风险增加[II组,调整后风险比(aHR)= 1.224,95%置信区间(CI):0.965-1.525,P = 0.096;III组,aHR = 1.316,95% CI:1.037-1.671,P = 0.024;IV组,aHR = 1.975,95% CI:1.500-62.601,P < 0.001]。特别是,主要终点复合事件中的心源性死亡在这种影响中起主要作用(II组,aHR = 1.335,95% CI:0.941-1.895,P = 0.106;III组,aHR = 1.575,95% CI:1.122-2.210,P = 0.009;IV组,aHR = 2.803,95% CI:1.937-4.054,P < 0.001)。
尽管AMI患者PCI技术和药物不断进步,但年龄仍对临床结局有重大影响。在AMI干预中,即使在现代心脏病学发达的时代,对老年人群也需要采取谨慎的方法。