Suppr超能文献

平等北方:我们如何减少英格兰北部的健康不平等?与研究人员、政策制定者和实践者一起进行的优先级排序练习。

Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.

Public Health England, North of England, Blenheim House, West One, Leeds LS1 4PL, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Dec 20;41(4):652-664. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy170.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. The aim of this exercise was to identify how to reduce health inequalities in the north of England.

METHODS

Workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve consensus. Round 1 answered open questions around priorities for action; Round 2 used a 5-point Likert scale to rate items; Round 3 responses were re-rated alongside a median response to each item. In total, 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data.

RESULTS

In Round 1, responses from 253 participants generated 39 items used in Round 2 (rated by 144 participants). Results from Round 3 (76 participants) indicate that poverty/implications of austerity (4.87 m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue, with long-term unemployment (4.8 m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7 m, IQR 1) second and third priorities. Workshop 3 did not diverge from findings in Round 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice professionals and academics agreed that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritizing research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment.

摘要

背景

平等北方网络是为了推进独立健康公平调查的《正北报告》的影响而建立的。这项工作的目的是确定如何减少英格兰北部的健康不平等。

方法

使用研讨会(15 个小组)和德尔菲调查(3 轮,368 名成员)来征求专家意见并达成共识。第 1 轮回答了关于行动优先事项的开放性问题;第 2 轮使用 5 分李克特量表对项目进行评分;第 3 轮的反应与每个项目的中位数反应一起重新评级。总共有 10 次研讨会在德尔菲调查后进行,以对数据进行三角剖分。

结果

第 1 轮,253 名参与者的回复生成了第 2 轮使用的 39 个项目(由 144 名参与者评分)。第 3 轮(76 名参与者)的结果表明,贫困/紧缩政策的影响(4.87 米,IQR0)仍然是优先事项,长期失业(4.8 米,IQR0)和心理健康(4.7 米,IQR1)是第二和第三优先事项。第 3 轮的研讨会与第 1 轮的发现没有分歧。

结论

实践专业人员和学者一致认为,要减少英格兰北部的健康不平等,需要优先研究解决与贫困、紧缩措施和失业有关的结构性决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7616/6995035/0b6c427bb544/fdy170f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验