Suppr超能文献

理论框架下的问卷效度检验实践:健康素养评估的系统描述性文献综述

Questionnaire validation practice within a theoretical framework: a systematic descriptive literature review of health literacy assessments.

作者信息

Hawkins Melanie, Elsworth Gerald R, Hoban Elizabeth, Osborne Richard H

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Deakin University School of Health and Social Development, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

Centre for Global Health and Equity, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e035974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035974.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Validity refers to the extent to which evidence and theory support the adequacy and appropriateness of inferences based on score interpretations. The health sector is lacking a theoretically-driven framework for the development, testing and use of health assessments. This study used the framework of five sources of validity evidence to assess the types of evidence reported for health literacy assessments, and to identify studies that referred to a theoretical validity testing framework.

METHODS

A systematic descriptive literature review investigated methods and results in health literacy assessment development, application and validity testing studies. Electronic searches were conducted in EBSCOhost, Embase, Open Access Theses and Dissertations and ProQuest Dissertations. Data were coded to the ' five sources of validity evidence, and for reference to a validity testing framework.

RESULTS

Coding on 46 studies resulted in 195 instances of validity evidence across the five sources. Only nine studies directly or indirectly referenced a validity testing framework. Evidence based on is most frequently reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The health and health equity of individuals and populations are increasingly dependent on decisions based on data collected through health assessments. An evidence-based theoretical framework provides structure and coherence to existing evidence and stipulates where further evidence is required to evaluate the extent to which data are valid for an intended purpose. This review demonstrates the use of the theoretical validity testing framework to evaluate sources of evidence reported for health literacy assessments. Findings indicate that theoretical validity testing frameworks are rarely used to collate and evaluate evidence in validation practice for health literacy assessments. Use of the theoretical validity testing framework would improve evaluation of the evidence for inferences derived from health assessment data on which public health and health equity decisions are based.

摘要

目的

效度是指证据和理论支持基于分数解释所做推断的充分性和恰当性的程度。卫生部门缺乏一个用于健康评估的开发、测试和使用的理论驱动框架。本研究使用效度证据的五个来源的框架来评估健康素养评估所报告的证据类型,并识别提及理论效度测试框架的研究。

方法

一项系统的描述性文献综述调查了健康素养评估开发、应用和效度测试研究中的方法和结果。在EBSCOhost、Embase、开放获取学位论文和ProQuest学位论文数据库中进行了电子检索。数据被编码为“效度证据的五个来源”,并编码是否提及效度测试框架。

结果

对46项研究进行编码后,在五个来源中产生了195个效度证据实例。只有九项研究直接或间接引用了效度测试框架。基于[此处缺失具体内容]的证据报告最为频繁。

结论

个人和人群的健康及健康公平性越来越依赖于基于通过健康评估收集的数据所做的决策。一个基于证据的理论框架为现有证据提供了结构和连贯性,并规定了需要进一步提供哪些证据来评估数据在预期目的上的有效程度。本综述展示了使用[此处缺失具体框架名称]理论效度测试框架来评估健康素养评估所报告的证据来源。研究结果表明,理论效度测试框架很少用于整理和评估健康素养评估验证实践中的证据。使用[此处缺失具体框架名称]理论效度测试框架将改进对基于健康评估数据得出的推断证据的评估,而公共卫生和健康公平决策正是基于这些数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fb7/7265003/e06a41b50047/bmjopen-2019-035974f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验