Suppr超能文献

原理验证:使用彩色多普勒超声门静脉血流频谱估测肝脏功能。

Proof of principle: Estimation of liver function using color coded Doppler sonography of the portal vein.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(4):585-594. doi: 10.3233/CH-189323.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic value of Doppler ultrasonography of the portal vein for the evaluation of liver function is still contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to test the relationship between clinical liver function tests based on MRI and breath testing and blood flow in the portal vein.

METHODS

The portal vein velocity was measured by color coded Doppler ultrasonography (CCDS) and tested against the relative enhancement (RE), a MRI-based index of liver function. The signal intensity in the liver parenchyma was assessed before (pre) and after (post) administration of contrast agent, the RE was calculated afterwards. Further, the liver function was also assessed using a 13C-Methacetin-based breath test. The blood flow in the portal vein was tested for possible correlation applying Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Using CCDS, all patients show a hepatopetal portal blood flow. The portal vein velocity is decreasing with progression of liver damage and there was a significant correlation of portal velocity with SI post (r = 0.411, p = 0.024). However, the portal velocity did not correlate significantly with the 13C-MBT readout (r = 0.233; p = 0.216), SI pre (r = 0.271, p = 0.147) or the relative enhancement (r = 0.303; p = 0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this proof-of-principle study indicate that CCDS-based assessment of portal velocity is of only limited value for the evaluation of liver function.

摘要

背景

门静脉多普勒超声检查对肝功能评估的诊断价值仍存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在检验基于 MRI 的临床肝功能检查与呼气试验和门静脉血流之间的关系。

方法

采用彩色编码多普勒超声(CCDS)测量门静脉速度,并与基于 MRI 的肝功能相对增强(RE)进行比较。在给予造影剂前后评估肝实质的信号强度,然后计算 RE。此外,还使用 13C-美沙西汀呼气试验评估肝功能。应用 Pearson 相关系数检验门静脉血流与其他参数之间的相关性。

结果

使用 CCDS,所有患者均显示出向肝性门静脉血流。门静脉速度随肝损伤的进展而降低,门静脉速度与 SI 后呈显著相关性(r = 0.411,p = 0.024)。然而,门静脉速度与 13C-MBT 读数(r = 0.233;p = 0.216)、SI 前(r = 0.271,p = 0.147)或相对增强(r = 0.303;p = 0.103)无显著相关性。

结论

这项原理验证研究的结果表明,基于 CCDS 的门静脉速度评估对肝功能评估的价值有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验