Suppr超能文献

豹( Panthera pardus )及其已灭绝的欧亚种群的历史生物地理学。

Historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) and its extinct Eurasian populations.

机构信息

Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

Leibniz Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Strasse 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1268-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resolving the historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) is a complex issue, because patterns inferred from fossils and from molecular data lack congruence. Fossil evidence supports an African origin, and suggests that leopards were already present in Eurasia during the Early Pleistocene. Analysis of DNA sequences however, suggests a more recent, Middle Pleistocene shared ancestry of Asian and African leopards. These contrasting patterns led researchers to propose a two-stage hypothesis of leopard dispersal out of Africa: an initial Early Pleistocene colonisation of Asia and a subsequent replacement by a second colonisation wave during the Middle Pleistocene. The status of Late Pleistocene European leopards within this scenario is unclear: were these populations remnants of the first dispersal, or do the last surviving European leopards share more recent ancestry with their African counterparts?

RESULTS

In this study, we generate and analyse mitogenome sequences from historical samples that span the entire modern leopard distribution, as well as from Late Pleistocene remains. We find a deep bifurcation between African and Eurasian mitochondrial lineages (~ 710 Ka), with the European ancient samples as sister to all Asian lineages (~ 483 Ka). The modern and historical mainland Asian lineages share a relatively recent common ancestor (~ 122 Ka), and we find one Javan sample nested within these.

CONCLUSIONS

The phylogenetic placement of the ancient European leopard as sister group to Asian leopards suggests that these populations originate from the same out-of-Africa dispersal which founded the Asian lineages. The coalescence time found for the mitochondrial lineages aligns well with the earliest undisputed fossils in Eurasia, and thus encourages a re-evaluation of the identification of the much older putative leopard fossils from the region. The relatively recent ancestry of all mainland Asian leopard lineages suggests that these populations underwent a severe population bottleneck during the Pleistocene. Finally, although only based on a single sample, the unexpected phylogenetic placement of the Javan leopard could be interpreted as evidence for exchange of mitochondrial lineages between Java and mainland Asia, calling for further investigation into the evolutionary history of this subspecies.

摘要

背景

解决豹子(豹属)的历史生物地理学是一个复杂的问题,因为化石和分子数据推断的模式缺乏一致性。化石证据支持非洲起源说,并表明豹子早在更新世早期就已经存在于欧亚大陆。然而,对 DNA 序列的分析表明,亚洲和非洲豹子的亲缘关系更近,发生在中更新世。这些相互矛盾的模式促使研究人员提出了豹子从非洲扩散的两阶段假说:最初在更新世早期向亚洲殖民,然后在中更新世期间,第二次殖民浪潮取代了第一次殖民浪潮。在这种情况下,晚更新世欧洲豹子的地位尚不清楚:这些种群是第一次扩散的残余,还是最后幸存的欧洲豹子与它们的非洲同类有更近的亲缘关系?

结果

在这项研究中,我们生成并分析了跨越整个现代豹子分布范围的历史样本和晚更新世遗骸的线粒体基因组序列。我们发现非洲和欧亚大陆的线粒体谱系之间存在很深的分支(710 千年前),而欧洲古代样本与所有亚洲谱系的姐妹关系(483 千年前)。现代和历史上的亚洲大陆谱系共享一个相对较近的共同祖先(~122 千年前),我们发现一个爪哇样本嵌套在这些谱系中。

结论

古代欧洲豹子作为亚洲豹子的姐妹群的系统发育位置表明,这些种群起源于同一支离非洲的扩散,该扩散为亚洲谱系奠定了基础。线粒体谱系的聚合时间与欧亚大陆最早无可争议的化石非常吻合,因此鼓励重新评估该地区更早的假定豹子化石的鉴定。所有亚洲大陆豹子谱系的相对较近的亲缘关系表明,这些种群在更新世期间经历了严重的种群瓶颈。最后,尽管仅基于一个样本,爪哇豹子的意外系统发育位置可以被解释为爪哇和亚洲大陆之间线粒体谱系交换的证据,需要进一步调查该亚种的进化历史。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf9/6198532/dcd5b1f7d613/12862_2018_1268_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验