• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lymphedema Research Prioritization Partnership: A Collaborative Approach to Setting Research Priorities for Lymphedema Management.淋巴水肿研究优先事项合作组织:一种为淋巴水肿管理确定研究优先事项的协作方法。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Jun;17(3):356-361. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0026. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.银屑病关节炎的 10 项首要研究重点:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2716-2723. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac676.
3
Research priorities in foot and ankle conditions: results of a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.足部和踝关节疾病的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的优先事项设定结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 16;13(5):e070641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070641.
4
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
5
The Eczema Priority Setting Partnership: a collaboration between patients, carers, clinicians and researchers to identify and prioritize important research questions for the treatment of eczema.湿疹优先事项设定伙伴关系:患者、护理人员、临床医生和研究人员之间的合作,旨在确定和优先考虑湿疹治疗的重要研究问题。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;168(3):577-82. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12040. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
6
Research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.50 岁以上人群上肢骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030028.
7
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.
8
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Defining Priorities for Future Research: Results of the UK Kidney Transplant Priority Setting Partnership.确定未来研究的优先事项:英国肾脏移植优先事项设定合作项目的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0162136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162136. eCollection 2016.
10
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastroepiploic Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Extremity Lymphedema: Tips and Insights from Extensive Clinical Experience.胃网膜血管化淋巴结转移治疗肢体淋巴水肿:丰富临床经验的技巧与见解
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 15;61(3):503. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030503.
2
The effect of compression therapies and therapeutic modalities on lymphedema secondary to cancer: a rapid review and evidence map.癌症相关继发性淋巴水肿的压缩疗法和治疗方式的影响:快速综述和证据图谱。
Med Oncol. 2024 Oct 17;41(11):288. doi: 10.1007/s12032-024-02447-w.
3
Examining the efficacy of treatments for arm lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.评估乳腺癌幸存者手臂淋巴水肿治疗方法的疗效:荟萃分析系统评价综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Dec 22;67:102397. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102397. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Evidence Mapping of the Treatments for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿治疗的证据图谱
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jan 18;10(1):e4045. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004045. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting.患者及护理人员参与方面错失的影响机会:一项关于研究优先级设定的混合方法案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 4;1:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0007-6. eCollection 2015.
2
Identifying priority areas for research into the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of cellulitis (erysipelas): results of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.确定蜂窝织炎(丹毒)诊断、治疗和预防研究的优先领域:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系的结果
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Aug;177(2):541-543. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15634. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
3
Future Research Priorities for Morbidity Control of Lymphedema.淋巴水肿发病率控制的未来研究重点
Indian J Dermatol. 2017 Jan-Feb;62(1):33-40. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.198039.
4
Chronic oedema: a prevalent health care problem for UK health services.慢性水肿:英国医疗服务面临的普遍健康问题。
Int Wound J. 2017 Oct;14(5):772-781. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12694. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
5
Research priorities for shoulder surgery: results of the 2015 James Lind Alliance patient and clinician priority setting partnership.肩部手术的研究重点:2015年詹姆斯·林德联盟患者与临床医生优先事项设定合作项目的结果
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010412.
6
Prevalence of lymphoedema in the UK: focus on the southwest and West Midlands.英国淋巴水肿的患病率:聚焦于西南部和西米德兰兹地区。
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Apr;Suppl:S6-14. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.Sup4.S6.
7
The emergency medicine research priority setting partnership.急诊医学研究重点确定合作项目
Emerg Med J. 2015 Nov;32(11):830. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205353. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Best Practice Guidelines in Assessment, Risk Reduction, Management, and Surveillance for Post-Breast Cancer Lymphedema.乳腺癌后淋巴水肿评估、风险降低、管理及监测的最佳实践指南
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013 Jun;5(2):134-144. doi: 10.1007/s12609-013-0105-0.
9
Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.通过詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目确定痤疮治疗的不确定性。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 17;5(7):e008085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085.
10
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.

淋巴水肿研究优先事项合作组织:一种为淋巴水肿管理确定研究优先事项的协作方法。

Lymphedema Research Prioritization Partnership: A Collaborative Approach to Setting Research Priorities for Lymphedema Management.

作者信息

Underwood Emma, Woods Mary, Riches Katie, Keeley Vaughan, Wallace Anita, Freeman Jennifer

机构信息

1 Lymphoedema Clinic, Therapy Department, PAW, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, United Kingdom.

2 Lymphoedema Service, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Jun;17(3):356-361. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0026. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1089/lrb.2018.0026
PMID:30358472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6589491/
Abstract

More research is needed in lymphedema management to strengthen the evidence base and ensure patients receive clinically and cost-effective treatment. It is critical that patients and clinicians are involved in prioritizing research to ensure that it reflects their needs and is not biased by commercial interests. This study aimed to set the research priorities for lymphedema management in the United Kingdom, through collaboration with patients, carers, and clinicians. Following the James Lind Alliance's methodology, a national survey was conducted to identify unanswered questions about lymphedema management from the perspective of patients, carers, and clinicians. These were collated and verified against an in-depth evidence review. Unanswered questions were formatted into broad research questions, which were prioritized by a purposive sample of patients, carers, and clinicians, using an online Delphi survey. The initial survey generated 631 submissions from 213 participants, including 108 patients, 9 carers, and 88 clinicians. Of these, 485 met inclusion criteria and were grouped into 12 overarching themes. The evidence review demonstrated that 101 submissions were answered by existing research and identified an additional 78 questions. The remaining unanswered submissions were collated into 126 broad research questions, which were prioritized over four rounds of the Delphi survey to produce the top 10 priorities. This study is the first to attempt to systematically identify research priorities for lymphedema management in the United Kingdom, from the perspective of patients, carers, and clinicians. The results provide guidance for researchers and funders to ensure future research meets the needs of those living with lymphedema.

摘要

在淋巴水肿管理方面需要进行更多研究,以加强证据基础,并确保患者获得具有临床效果且性价比高的治疗。患者和临床医生参与确定研究重点至关重要,以确保研究反映他们的需求,且不受商业利益的影响。本研究旨在通过与患者、护理人员和临床医生合作,确定英国淋巴水肿管理的研究重点。遵循詹姆斯·林德联盟的方法,开展了一项全国性调查,从患者、护理人员和临床医生的角度确定有关淋巴水肿管理的未解决问题。这些问题经过整理,并对照深入的证据审查进行核实。未解决的问题被整理成广泛的研究问题,通过在线德尔菲调查,由患者、护理人员和临床医生的目标样本对这些问题进行优先排序。初步调查收到了来自213名参与者的631份提交内容,包括108名患者、9名护理人员和88名临床医生。其中,485份符合纳入标准,并被归为12个总体主题。证据审查表明,现有研究回答了101份提交内容,并确定了另外78个问题。其余未解决的提交内容被整理成126个广泛的研究问题,在四轮德尔菲调查中对这些问题进行优先排序,以得出前10个优先事项。本研究首次尝试从患者、护理人员和临床医生的角度系统地确定英国淋巴水肿管理的研究重点。研究结果为研究人员和资助者提供了指导,以确保未来的研究满足淋巴水肿患者的需求。