Suppr超能文献

通过詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目确定痤疮治疗的不确定性。

Identifying acne treatment uncertainties via a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

作者信息

Layton Alison, Eady E Anne, Peat Maggie, Whitehouse Heather, Levell Nick, Ridd Matthew, Cowdell Fiona, Patel Mahenda, Andrews Stephen, Oxnard Christine, Fenton Mark, Firkins Lester

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 17;5(7):e008085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008085.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Acne Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was set up to identify and rank treatment uncertainties by bringing together people with acne, and professionals providing care within and beyond the National Health Service (NHS).

SETTING

The UK with international participation.

PARTICIPANTS

Teenagers and adults with acne, parents, partners, nurses, clinicians, pharmacists, private practitioners.

METHODS

Treatment uncertainties were collected via separate online harvesting surveys, embedded within the PSP website, for patients and professionals. A wide variety of approaches were used to promote the surveys to stakeholder groups with a particular emphasis on teenagers and young adults. Survey submissions were collated using keywords and verified as uncertainties by appraising existing evidence. The 30 most popular themes were ranked via weighted scores from an online vote. At a priority setting workshop, patients and professionals discussed the 18 highest-scoring questions from the vote, and reached consensus on the top 10.

RESULTS

In the harvesting survey, 2310 people, including 652 professionals and 1456 patients (58% aged 24 y or younger), made submissions containing at least one research question. After checking for relevance and rephrasing, a total of 6255 questions were collated into themes. Valid votes ranking the 30 most common themes were obtained from 2807 participants. The top 10 uncertainties prioritised at the workshop were largely focused on management strategies, optimum use of common prescription medications and the role of non-drug based interventions. More female than male patients took part in the harvesting surveys and vote. A wider range of uncertainties were provided by patients compared to professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Engaging teenagers and young adults in priority setting is achievable using a variety of promotional methods. The top 10 uncertainties reveal an extensive knowledge gap about widely used interventions and the relative merits of drug versus non-drug based treatments in acne management.

摘要

目的

痤疮优先事项设定合作组织(PSP)的成立是为了通过汇聚痤疮患者以及在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内外提供护理的专业人员,来识别治疗中的不确定性并进行排序。

背景

英国,有国际参与。

参与者

患有痤疮的青少年和成年人、父母、伴侣、护士、临床医生、药剂师、私人执业者。

方法

通过PSP网站上分别针对患者和专业人员的在线收集调查问卷,收集治疗中的不确定性。采用了多种方法向利益相关者群体推广这些调查,特别侧重于青少年和年轻人。使用关键词对调查提交内容进行整理,并通过评估现有证据将其确认为不确定性因素。通过在线投票的加权分数对30个最热门主题进行排名。在一次优先事项设定研讨会上,患者和专业人员讨论了投票中得分最高的18个问题,并就前10个问题达成了共识。

结果

在收集调查问卷中,2310人提交了至少包含一个研究问题的内容,其中包括652名专业人员和1456名患者(58%年龄在24岁及以下)。在检查相关性并重新表述后,共整理出6255个问题形成主题。从2807名参与者那里获得了对30个最常见主题进行排名的有效投票。研讨会上确定的前10个不确定性因素主要集中在管理策略、常用处方药的最佳使用以及非药物干预措施的作用。参与收集调查问卷和投票的女性患者多于男性患者。与专业人员相比,患者提出了更广泛的不确定性因素。

结论

通过多种推广方法,让青少年和年轻人参与优先事项设定是可行的。前10个不确定性因素揭示了在痤疮管理中,对于广泛使用的干预措施以及药物治疗与非药物治疗的相对优点存在广泛的知识差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf5/4513497/88166525fec9/bmjopen2015008085f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验