• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么要评估重度创伤性脑损伤患者的延迟一周的言语回忆能力?

Why evaluate one-week-delayed verbal recall in patients with severe traumatic brain injury?

作者信息

Manoli Romina, Chartaux-Danjou Laurence, Delecroix Helene, Daveluy Walter, Moroni Christine

机构信息

a PSITEC Lab (EA 4072) , University of Lille , Villeneuve-d'Ascq , France.

b U.E.R.O.S. Lille , UGECAM Hauts-de-France , Lille , France.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2018;32(13-14):1684-1689. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1539245. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2018.1539245
PMID:30359148
Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to propose new measures to evaluate memory processes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this purpose, we analyzed learning and consolidation processes depending on own patient's performance during a memory test.

METHODS

One-week Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test - word version (1W-FCSRT-word), which special feature relies on a 30-min and a 1-week-delayed recall after encoding, was administered to a group of 43 patients with severe TBI (age range from 20 to 54 years) and a group of neurologically healthy volunteers matched for age and gender.

RESULTS

Patients performed worse than healthy volunteers for the learning score. Their forgetting percentage was above healthy volunteers' performance and difference between the two groups increased with the delay from the learning phase.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe TBI, our results underlined an altered learning and an impairment of long-term consolidation. It is crucial to detect these deficits in the aim to highlight, with a better accuracy, these patients' memory complaints and to propose a better professional rehabilitation.

摘要

主要目的

本研究旨在提出新的方法来评估重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的记忆过程。为此,我们根据患者在记忆测试中的自身表现分析学习和巩固过程。

方法

对一组43例重度TBI患者(年龄范围20至54岁)和一组年龄及性别匹配的神经功能正常的志愿者进行了为期一周的自由和提示选择性回忆测试 - 单词版(1W-FCSRT-word),该测试的特点是在编码后有30分钟和1周延迟回忆。

结果

患者在学习得分上比健康志愿者表现更差。他们的遗忘百分比高于健康志愿者,且两组之间的差异随着从学习阶段开始的延迟而增加。

结论

在重度TBI患者中,我们的结果强调了学习改变和长期巩固受损。检测这些缺陷对于更准确地突出这些患者的记忆问题并提出更好的专业康复建议至关重要。

相似文献

1
Why evaluate one-week-delayed verbal recall in patients with severe traumatic brain injury?为什么要评估重度创伤性脑损伤患者的延迟一周的言语回忆能力?
Brain Inj. 2018;32(13-14):1684-1689. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1539245. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Extension to one week of verbal memory consolidation assessment.口头记忆巩固评估延长一周。
Neuropsychology. 2018 Mar;32(3):366-373. doi: 10.1037/neu0000403. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
3
Four-hour delayed memory recall for stories: Theoretical and clinical implications of measuring accelerated long-term forgetting.故事的四小时延迟记忆回忆:测量加速长期遗忘的理论与临床意义
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23(3):205-12. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1030670. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Comparison of the Buschke Selective Reminding Test and the California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition in a heterogeneous sample of people with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤异质性样本中Buschke选择性提醒测验与加利福尼亚言语学习测验第二版的比较
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019 Mar-Apr;26(2):124-138. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2017.1362561. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
A normative study of the Italian printed word version of the free and cued selective reminding test.意大利语印刷文字版自由和提示性选择性回忆测验的标准化研究。
Neurol Sci. 2015 Jul;36(7):1127-34. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2237-7. Epub 2015 May 8.
6
The impact of verbal memory encoding and consolidation deficits during recovery from moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.中度至重度创伤性脑损伤康复期间言语记忆编码和巩固缺陷的影响。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):182-91. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318218dcf9.
7
Construct validity of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test in older adults with memory complaints.有记忆主诉的老年人自由和线索选择性回忆测验的结构效度。
J Neuropsychol. 2017 Jun;11(2):238-251. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12087. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Retrieval practice improves memory in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.检索练习可改善严重创伤性脑损伤幸存者的记忆。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):397-400. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
Selective attention and the three-process memory model for the interpretation of verbal free recall in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.选择性注意和三过程记忆模型对肌萎缩侧索硬化症言语自由回忆的解释。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Sep;18(5):809-18. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000562. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Accelerated long-term forgetting in transient epileptic amnesia: an acquisition or consolidation deficit?短暂性癫痫性遗忘的长期记忆加速遗忘:是获得性缺陷还是巩固性缺陷?
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jul;51(8):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term retrieval performance is associated with CA1 hippocampal volume in older adults and individuals at risk for dementia.长期记忆检索能力与老年人及有痴呆风险个体的海马体CA1区体积有关。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025 Aug 22;17(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01833-4.
2
Forgetting is comparable between healthy young and old people.健康的年轻人和老年人在遗忘方面具有可比性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82570-w.