Bohac Maja, Koncarevic Mateja, Pasalic Adi, Biscevic Alma, Merlak Maja, Gabric Nikica, Patel Sudi
a School of Medicine, University of Rijeka , Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost" , Zagreb , Croatia.
b Department of Ophthalmology , School of Medicine, University of Rijeka , Rijeka , Croatia.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(7-8):869-877. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2018.1539183. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
To report the incidence of postoperative ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
A retrospective case review of 30,167 eyes (16,732 patients) was conducted following LASIK between August 2007 and August 2015. The follow-up was between 2 and 8 years. Tomography was performed after 2 years postop. After identifying cases of ectasia, the charts of these patients were examined to identify any common factors that may have predisposed them to develop ectasia.
Ten eyes of seven patients developed post-LASIK ectasia. Eight eyes had been treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism, two eyes for mixed astigmatism. There were no cases of ectasia after LASIK for hyperopia. All 10 cases of ectasia had a flap that was created using the Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome (average flap thickness 118.15 ± 12.88 µm) and refractive error corrected using the Wavelight Allegretto excimer laser. Retrospectively, most prevalent risk factors were thin cornea (≤ 500 µm, 50% of cases), anterior topographic map irregularities (e.g., asymmetric bow tie, 40% of cases), Ectasia Risk Score > 3 (40% of cases), percent tissue thickness alteration ≥ 40% (20% of cases) and low residual stromal bed (≤ 300 µm, 30% of cases). One eye had no identifiable risk factors. In the retrospective chart review 14.97% (4,506) of all the eyes had similar risk factors to the cases that went on to develop ectasia.
The incidence of ectasia was 0.033% over 8 years. The incidence could be higher as some cases may destabilize beyond this period and some patients were lost to follow-up asymptomatic of any clinical signs. Other intrinsic factors may trigger the development of post LASIK ectasia. The current widely accepted risk factors are not sufficiently rigorous for screening out potential ectasia from developing after LASIK. There is a need to augment accuracy with higher sensitivity and specificity.
报告准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后角膜扩张的发生率。
对2007年8月至2015年8月行LASIK手术的30167只眼(16732例患者)进行回顾性病例分析。随访时间为2至8年。术后2年进行断层扫描。在确定角膜扩张病例后,检查这些患者的病历,以确定可能使他们易患角膜扩张的任何共同因素。
7例患者的10只眼发生了LASIK术后角膜扩张。8只眼曾接受近视和近视散光治疗,2只眼接受混合散光治疗。远视LASIK术后无角膜扩张病例。所有10例角膜扩张病例均使用Moria M2机械微型角膜刀制作角膜瓣(平均角膜瓣厚度118.15±12.88µm),并使用威视准分子激光矫正屈光不正。回顾性分析,最常见的危险因素是角膜薄(≤500µm,50%的病例)、眼前节地形图不规则(如不对称领结形,40%的病例)、角膜扩张风险评分>3(40%的病例)、组织厚度改变百分比≥40%(20%的病例)和剩余基质床薄(≤300µm,30%的病例)。1只眼没有可识别的危险因素。在回顾性病历分析中,所有眼中有14.97%(4506只)具有与发生角膜扩张病例相似的危险因素。
8年间角膜扩张的发生率为0.033%。由于一些病例可能在此期间后病情不稳定,且一些患者失访且无任何临床症状,因此实际发生率可能更高。其他内在因素可能引发LASIK术后角膜扩张的发生。目前广泛接受的危险因素在筛查LASIK术后潜在角膜扩张方面不够严格。需要提高敏感性和特异性以增强准确性。