Miszczyk Marcin, Majewski Wojciech
Department of Radiotherapy Planning, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland. Email:
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Oct 26;19(10):2803-2806. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.10.2803.
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare hematologic adverse effects and hematologic toxicity (HT) of pelvic irradiation in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for radical treatment of prostate and bladder cancer. Methods: A group of 115 patients with prostate or bladder cancer treated with definitive radical radiotherapy was evaluated retrospectively. Blood test were taken before and after treatment comprising of following indices: white blood cells (WBC) hemoglobin (HGB), red blood cell (RBC), lymphocyte (LC), neutrophil (NC) and platelet (PLT) count. Patients were divided into several subgroups and the data was evaluated statistically using absolute and relative values. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in WBC (p=0.007), NC (p=0.031) and PLT (p=0.026) count decrease (absolute values) after treatment, between two treatment methods (CRT and IMRT), all in favor of IMRT. The relationship still proves to be significant regarding WBC (p=0,02) and (NC) (p=0,049) after presenting the data as relative percentage loss of starting value. However using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), PLT count toxicity was more common in IMRT group (p=0.045). Conclusion: IMRT in comparison to CRT in bladder and prostate cancer patients is associated with a lesser absolute and relative decrease of hematologic indices. The hematologic effect of radiation was observed mainly regarding LC. Patients treated with IMRT suffered from significantly lesser decrease in relative and absolute values of WBC and NC. The mean of absolute PLT decrease count was lower in IMRT group; however, toxicity according to CTCAE was slightly more prevalent in IMRT group.
本研究旨在比较接受适形放疗(CRT)和调强放疗(IMRT)根治性治疗前列腺癌和膀胱癌患者盆腔照射的血液学不良反应和血液学毒性(HT)。方法:回顾性评估一组115例接受根治性放疗的前列腺癌或膀胱癌患者。在治疗前后进行血液检查,包括以下指标:白细胞(WBC)、血红蛋白(HGB)、红细胞(RBC)、淋巴细胞(LC)、中性粒细胞(NC)和血小板(PLT)计数。患者被分为几个亚组,并使用绝对值和相对值对数据进行统计学评估。结果:两种治疗方法(CRT和IMRT)治疗后白细胞(p = 0.007)、中性粒细胞(p = 0.031)和血小板(p = 0.026)计数下降(绝对值)存在统计学显著差异,均有利于IMRT。以起始值相对百分比损失表示数据后,白细胞(p = 0.02)和中性粒细胞(p = 0.049)的关系仍被证明具有显著性。然而,使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE),血小板计数毒性在IMRT组更常见(p = 0.045)。结论:与CRT相比,IMRT治疗膀胱癌和前列腺癌患者时血液学指标的绝对和相对下降较小。主要观察到辐射对淋巴细胞的血液学影响。接受IMRT治疗的患者白细胞和中性粒细胞的相对和绝对值下降明显较小。IMRT组血小板绝对下降计数的平均值较低;然而,根据CTCAE,IMRT组的毒性略为普遍。