• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性轻度颅内出血:区域创伤中心非神经外科顾问的管理是安全有效的。

Traumatic Minor Intracranial Hemorrhage: Management by Non-neurosurgeon Consultants in a Regional Trauma Center is Safe and Effective.

作者信息

Khalayleh H, Lin G, Kadar Sfarad H, Mostafa M, Abu Abed N, Imam A, Zbar A P, Mavor E

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center (Affiliated to the School of Medicine, Hebrew University and Hadassah, Jerusalem), 76100, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4821-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-018-4821-5
PMID:30361746
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is debate concerning the need for specialist neurosurgical transfer of patients presenting to Level II trauma centers with a minimal head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥13) and a small non-progressive intracranial bleeding (ICB).

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was performed assessing the outcomes of adult patients presenting with a minor traumatic ICB on initial CT scan (minimal subarachnoid hemorrhage; small-width subdural hematoma without shift; punctate cerebral contusion). Patients with extradural hematomas and those patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy were excluded from the protocol.

RESULTS

Overall 291 cases were assessed (mean age 69.9 years) with 75% of cases presenting after a fall. There was deterioration of neurological status in 11 patients (3.8%) with 8 hospital transfers and 5 with an abnormal neurological examination (NE). Two patients with an abnormal INR and a worsening head CT were transferred without neurosurgical intervention. Of the 8 transferred cases there were 2 deaths (both >90 years of age with multiple comorbidities) with one craniotomy performed for a subdural hematoma (with full recovery). Three patients meeting transfer criteria were not transferred with one death (patient >90 years of age with severe dementia). The remaining 2 patients were discharged with normal neurological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a minimal traumatic brain injury and a non-progressive minor ICB may be safely managed in a Level II trauma center by an acute care consultant with neurosurgical consultation but without the need for neurosurgical transfer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective analysis: Level IV.

摘要

背景

对于轻度颅脑损伤(格拉斯哥昏迷量表≥13分)且颅内出血(ICB)较小且无进展的患者,是否需要专科神经外科转运至二级创伤中心存在争议。

方法

进行回顾性病历分析,评估初次CT扫描显示轻度创伤性ICB的成年患者的结局(最小蛛网膜下腔出血;无移位的小宽度硬膜下血肿;点状脑挫伤)。硬膜外血肿患者以及接受抗血小板或抗凝治疗的患者被排除在该方案之外。

结果

共评估了291例病例(平均年龄69.9岁),75%的病例为跌倒后就诊。11例患者(3.8%)神经功能状态恶化,其中8例转院,5例神经检查(NE)异常。2例国际标准化比值异常且头颅CT恶化的患者未经神经外科干预即被转院。在8例转院病例中,有2例死亡(均>90岁,合并多种疾病),其中1例因硬膜下血肿行开颅手术(完全康复)。3例符合转院标准的患者未转院,1例死亡(>90岁,重度痴呆患者)。其余2例患者出院时神经功能正常。

结论

轻度创伤性脑损伤且非进展性轻度ICB的患者可在二级创伤中心由急性护理顾问进行安全管理,并接受神经外科会诊,但无需神经外科转运。

证据级别

回顾性分析:四级。

相似文献

1
Traumatic Minor Intracranial Hemorrhage: Management by Non-neurosurgeon Consultants in a Regional Trauma Center is Safe and Effective.创伤性轻度颅内出血:区域创伤中心非神经外科顾问的管理是安全有效的。
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4821-5.
2
A prospective evaluation of the value of repeat cranial computed tomography in patients with minimal head injury and an intracranial bleed.对轻度头部损伤合并颅内出血患者重复进行头颅计算机断层扫描价值的前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):862-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000224225.54982.90.
3
Role of repeat CT in mild to moderate head injury: an institutional study.重复 CT 在轻度至中度头部损伤中的作用:一项机构研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19527.
4
Mild traumatic brain injuries with minor intracranial hemorrhage: Can they Be safely managed in the community? - A cohort study.轻度创伤性脑损伤伴颅内少量出血:能否在社区内安全管理?-一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
[Value of serial CT scanning and intracranial pressure monitoring for detecting new intracranial mass effect in severe head injury patients showing lesions type I-II in the initial CT scan].[连续CT扫描及颅内压监测对初始CT扫描显示为I-II型病变的重型颅脑损伤患者新出现的颅内占位效应的检测价值]
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Jun;16(3):217-34.
6
Patients with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage are at low risk for deterioration or neurosurgical intervention.创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者发生恶化或需要神经外科干预的风险较低。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1504-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829215cf.
7
Assessing the efficacy of mild traumatic brain injury management.评估轻度创伤性脑损伤管理的疗效。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;202:106518. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106518. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Management of patients with traumatic intracranial injury in hospitals without neurosurgical service.在没有神经外科服务的医院中对创伤性颅内损伤患者的管理。
J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):544-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c99936.
9
Outcomes of a nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injury with abnormal head computed tomography in a rural hospital setting.农村医院环境中头部计算机断层扫描异常的轻度创伤性脑损伤非转院方案的结果。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):e319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Opportunity to reduce transfer of patients with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage to a Level 1 trauma center.减少轻度创伤性脑损伤和颅内出血患者转至一级创伤中心的机会。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;35(9):1281-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.071. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Preinjury Use of Antiplatelet Drugs on Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伤前使用抗血小板药物对创伤性脑损伤结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 7;13:724641. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.724641. eCollection 2022.
2
Mild Head Trauma: Is Antiplatelet Therapy a Risk Factor for Hemorrhagic Complications?轻度头部创伤:抗血小板治疗是出血性并发症的危险因素吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 7;57(4):357. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040357.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of delayed head CT in evaluation of elderly blunt head trauma victims taking antithrombotic therapy.延迟头颅CT在评估接受抗血栓治疗的老年钝性头部创伤患者中的作用。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):741-746. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0793-7. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Improving Hospital Quality and Costs in Nonoperative Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Acute Care Surgeons.改善非手术性创伤性脑损伤的医院质量和成本:急性护理外科医生的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):866-72. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1134.
3
Mild traumatic brain injury defined by Glasgow Coma Scale: Is it really mild?
根据格拉斯哥昏迷量表定义的轻度创伤性脑损伤:它真的是轻度的吗?
Brain Inj. 2015;29(1):11-6. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.945959. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
4
Risk factors of delayed surgical evacuation for initially nonoperative acute subdural hematomas following mild head injury.轻度颅脑损伤后最初采取非手术治疗的急性硬膜下血肿延迟手术清除的危险因素。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Aug;156(8):1605-13. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2151-4. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
A three-year prospective study of repeat head computed tomography in patients with traumatic brain injury.一项关于颅脑创伤患者重复头部 CT 的三年前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jul;219(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.062. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
6
Repeat head computed tomography in anticoagulated traumatic brain injury patients: still warranted.对抗凝治疗的创伤性脑损伤患者进行重复头颅计算机断层扫描:仍有必要。
Am Surg. 2014 Jan;80(1):43-7.
7
Emergency access to neurosurgical care for patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者的神经外科紧急救治通道。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
8
Outcomes of a nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injury with abnormal head computed tomography in a rural hospital setting.农村医院环境中头部计算机断层扫描异常的轻度创伤性脑损伤非转院方案的结果。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):e319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Value of repeat head computed tomography after traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.颅脑创伤后重复头部 CT 的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jan 1;31(1):78-98. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2873. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
10
The acute care surgery model: managing traumatic brain injury without an inpatient neurosurgical consultation.急症外科模式:在没有神经外科住院会诊的情况下治疗创伤性脑损伤。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):102-5; discussion 105. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182946667.