Suppr超能文献

伤前使用抗血小板药物对创伤性脑损伤结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

The Impact of Preinjury Use of Antiplatelet Drugs on Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Cheng Li, Cui Gaoliang, Yang Rong

机构信息

Department of Medicine Rehabilitation, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City, Shangqiu, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 7;13:724641. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.724641. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients on pre-injury antiplatelet drugs vs. those, not on any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 15th May 2021. All cohort studies comparing outcomes of TBI between antiplatelet users vs. non-users were included.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. On comparison of data of 2,447 patients on pre-injury antiplatelet drugs with 4,814 controls, our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in early mortality between the two groups (OR: 1.30 95% CI: 0.85, 1.98 = 80% = 0.23). Meta-analysis of adjusted data also revealed no statistically significant difference in early mortality between antiplatelet users vs. controls (OR: 1.24 95% CI: 0.93, 1.65 = 41% = 0.14). Results were similar for subgroup analysis of aspirin users and clopidogrel users. Data on functional outcomes was scarce and only descriptive analysis could be carried out. For the need for surgical intervention, pooled analysis did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between the two groups (OR: 1.11 95% CI: 0.83, 1.48 = 55% = 0.50). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also not found to be significantly different between antiplatelet users vs. non-users (MD: -1.00 95% CI: -2.17, 0.17 = 97% = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that patients on pre-injury antiplatelet drugs do not have worse early mortality rates as compared to patients, not on any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. The use of antiplatelets is not associated with an increased need for neurosurgical intervention and prolonged LOS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较伤前使用抗血小板药物的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者与未使用任何抗血小板或抗凝药物的患者的预后情况。

方法

检索截至2021年5月15日的PubMed、Embase和谷歌学术数据库。纳入所有比较抗血小板药物使用者与非使用者TBI预后的队列研究。

结果

共纳入20项研究。将2447名伤前使用抗血小板药物的患者与4814名对照者的数据进行比较,我们的分析显示两组早期死亡率无统计学显著差异(比值比:1.30,95%置信区间:0.85,1.98;I² = 80%,P = 0.23)。对调整后数据的荟萃分析也显示抗血小板药物使用者与对照者之间早期死亡率无统计学显著差异(比值比:1.24,95%置信区间:0.93,1.65;I² = 41%,P = 0.14)。阿司匹林使用者和氯吡格雷使用者的亚组分析结果相似。功能预后数据稀少,仅能进行描述性分析。对于手术干预需求,汇总分析未显示两组之间有任何统计学显著差异(比值比:1.11,95%置信区间:0.83,1.48;I² = 55%,P = 0.50)。抗血小板药物使用者与非使用者之间的住院时间(LOS)也未发现有显著差异(平均差:-1.00,95%置信区间:-2.17,0.17;I² = 97%,P = 0.09)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与未使用任何抗血小板或抗凝药物的患者相比,伤前使用抗血小板药物的患者早期死亡率并不更高。抗血小板药物的使用与神经外科干预需求增加和住院时间延长无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9cc/8858945/860bfa012064/fneur-13-724641-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验