Suppr超能文献

改良冠向推进隧道技术联合胶原基质或黏膜下结缔组织移植治疗Miller Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型牙周退缩的临床评价:一项随机临床研究。

Clinical evaluation of Miller class I and II recessions treatment with the use of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with either collagen matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft: A randomized clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.

Dental Practice, Białystok, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jan;46(1):86-95. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13031. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

Abstract

AIM

To compare outcomes of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique (MCAT) combined with either collagen matrix (CM) or subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of Miller class I and II multiple gingival recessions in the mandible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study encompassed 91 recessions in 29 patients for whom MCAT was combined with CM on one side of the mandible and SCTG on the contralateral one. The following clinical parameters were measured: gingival recession height (GR) and width (RW), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinized tissue (KT), gingival thickness (GT), mean (MRC) and complete root coverage (CRC) and Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES).

RESULTS

The MRC proportions on the CM- and SCTG-treated sides were 53.20% and 83.10%, respectively. CRC was achieved in 9 out of 45 (20%) gingival defects treated with CM and 31 out of 46 (67%) treated with SCTG. There were statistically significant differences in MRC, CRC, GR, RW, KT, GT and RES between CM- and CTG-treated sides.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified coronally advanced tunnel technique leads to reduction in gingival recession both when combined CM and SCTG, of which the latter is more efficient as far as root coverage and aesthetic parameters are concerned.

摘要

目的

比较改良冠向牙龈推进术(MCAT)联合胶原基质(CM)或黏膜下结缔组织移植(SCTG)治疗下颌骨Miller Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类多发性牙龈退缩的效果。

材料和方法

本研究共纳入 29 名患者的 91 处牙龈退缩,其中一侧下颌骨采用 MCAT 联合 CM,对侧采用 SCTG。测量以下临床参数:牙龈退缩高度(GR)和宽度(RW)、探诊深度(PD)、临床附着水平(CAL)、角化组织宽度(KT)、牙龈厚度(GT)、平均(MRC)和完全根覆盖(CRC)以及根覆盖美学评分(RES)。

结果

CM 和 SCTG 治疗侧的 MRC 比例分别为 53.20%和 83.10%。CM 治疗的 45 个牙龈缺损中有 9 个(20%)达到 CRC,SCTG 治疗的 46 个中有 31 个(67%)达到 CRC。CM 和 SCTG 治疗侧的 MRC、CRC、GR、RW、KT、GT 和 RES 存在统计学差异。

结论

改良冠向牙龈推进术联合 CM 和 SCTG 均可减少牙龈退缩,就根覆盖和美学参数而言,后者更为有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验