Suppr超能文献

非手术治疗种植体周围炎而不清除肉芽组织:一项 3 年研究。

Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Without Eliminating Granulation Tissue: A 3-Year Study.

机构信息

Professor, Department of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy.

Researcher, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University-Hospital at Pisa, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Implant Dent. 2019 Feb;28(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000832.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过机械清创和局部解毒,保留植入物周围的肉芽组织,从而对种植体周围炎采取非手术治疗方法。

材料与方法

对两种非手术治疗方案(机械清创加 0.2%洗必泰与盐酸金霉素化学解毒[试验组],以及单纯机械清创[对照组])的治疗效果进行了分析。在治疗后 3、24 和 36 个月分别采集各项测量值。

结果

共纳入 75 例患有种植体周围炎的种植体。在 36 个月的评估中,试验组的平均探诊深度为 3.15 ± 0.32mm,而对照组为 5.97 ± 0.90mm,差异具有统计学意义。试验组记录到边缘骨水平有所改善,而对照组则显示出进一步的边缘骨丧失。试验组的治疗成功率为 100%,而对照组为 31.4%。

结论

单纯的非手术种植体清创似乎不能有效治疗种植体周围炎。需要进一步的纵向研究来评估机械清创加化学解毒以及清除肉芽组织与单纯机械清创加化学解毒的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验