School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia.
School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2571, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 25;15(11):2353. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112353.
The preparation and practice of home-escape plans are important strategies for individuals and families seeking to reduce and/or prevent fire-related injury or death. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of and factors associated with, home-escape plans in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The study used data from two surveys-a 2016 fire safety attitudes and behaviour survey administered to high-risk individuals ( = 296) and a 2013 NSW health survey covering 13,027 adults aged 16 years and above. It applied multinomial logistic regression analyses to these data to identify factors associated with having a written home-fire escape plan, having an unwritten home-fire escape plan and not having any home-fire escape plan. The prevalence of written home-escape plans was only 4.3% (95% CI: 2.5, 7.5) for the high-risk individuals and 7.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3, 8.6) for the entire NSW population. The prevalence of unwritten escape plans was 44.6% (95% CI: 38.8, 50.5) for the high-risk individuals and 26.2% (95% CI: 25.1, 27.2) for the NSW population. The prevalence of no-escape plan at all was 51.1% (95% CI: 45.2, 56.9) for the high-risk individuals and 65.9% (95% CI: 64.8, 67.1) for the NSW population. After adjusting for other covariates, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with unwritten-escape plan and no-escape plan prevalence: speaking only the English language at home, practicing home-fire escape plans infrequently, being married, being female and testing smoke alarms less often. Future fire interventions should target people who speak only English at home and people who test their smoke alarms infrequently. These interventions should be accompanied by research aimed at reversing the trend toward use of more flammable materials in homes.
家庭逃生计划的准备和实践是个人和家庭减少和/或预防与火灾相关的伤害或死亡的重要策略。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)家庭逃生计划的流行情况以及相关因素。该研究使用了两项调查的数据-一项针对高风险人群(= 296 人)的 2016 年消防安全态度和行为调查,以及一项涵盖 13027 名 16 岁及以上成年人的 2013 年新南威尔士州健康调查。它对这些数据应用了多项逻辑回归分析,以确定与拥有书面家庭火灾逃生计划、拥有非书面家庭火灾逃生计划和没有任何家庭火灾逃生计划相关的因素。对于高风险人群,书面家庭逃生计划的流行率仅为 4.3%(95%CI:2.5,7.5),而整个新南威尔士州人口的流行率为 7.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:7.3,8.6)。高风险人群中非书面逃生计划的流行率为 44.6%(95%CI:38.8,50.5),而新南威尔士州人口的流行率为 26.2%(95%CI:25.1,27.2)。完全没有逃生计划的流行率在高风险人群中为 51.1%(95%CI:45.2,56.9),在新南威尔士州人口中为 65.9%(95%CI:64.8,67.1)。在调整了其他协变量后,以下因素被发现与非书面逃生计划和无逃生计划的流行率显著相关:在家只说英语、不经常练习家庭火灾逃生计划、已婚、女性和不经常测试烟雾报警器。未来的火灾干预措施应该针对在家只说英语的人和不经常测试烟雾报警器的人。这些干预措施应辅以旨在扭转家庭中使用更多易燃材料趋势的研究。