Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE, 68182-0860, USA.
Department of Gerontology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6001 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE, 68182-0202, USA.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Aug;31(8):1077-1086. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1059-x. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
Dual-task paradigms are used to investigate gait and cognitive declines in older adults (OA). Optic-flow is a virtual reality environment where the scene flows past the subject while walking on a treadmill, mimicking real-life locomotion.
To investigate cost of environment (no optic-flow v. optic-flow) while completing single- and dual-task walking and dual-task costs (DTC; single- v. dual-task) in optic-flow and no optic-flow environments.
Twenty OA and seven younger adults (YA) walked on a self-paced treadmill in 3-min segments per task and both environments. Five task conditions included: no task, semantic fluency (category), phonemic fluency (letters), word reading, and serial-subtraction.
OAs had a benefit of optic-flow compared to no optic-flow for step width (p = 0.015) and step length (p = 0.045) during letters compared to the YA. During letters, OA experienced improvement in step width DTC; whereas YA had a decrement in step width DTC from no optic-flow to optic-flow (p = 0.038). During serial-subtraction, OA had less step width DTC when compared to YA in both environments (p = 0.02).
During letters, step width and step length improved in OA while walking in optic-flow. Also, step width DTC differed between the two groups. Sensory information from optic-flow appears to benefit OA. Letters relies more on verbal ability and word knowledge, which are preserved in aging. However, YA use a complex speech style during dual tasking, searching for complex words and an increased speed of speech.
OA can benefit from optic-flow by improving spatial gait parameters, specifically, step width, during dual-task walking.
双任务范式被用于研究老年人(OA)的步态和认知能力下降。视流是一种虚拟现实环境,当主体在跑步机上行走时,场景会流过主体,模拟现实生活中的运动。
研究在完成单任务和双任务行走时环境成本(无视流与视流)以及在视流和无视流环境中双任务成本(DTC;单任务与双任务)的差异。
20 名 OA 和 7 名年轻成年人(YA)在每个任务和两种环境下以 3 分钟为一段的自我节奏在跑步机上行走。五种任务条件包括:无任务、语义流畅性(类别)、语音流畅性(字母)、单词阅读和连续减法。
OA 在进行字母任务时,与 YA 相比,视流下的步幅(p=0.015)和步长(p=0.045)均有获益。在进行字母任务时,OA 的步宽 DTC 有所改善;而 YA 则从无视流到视流时步宽 DTC 下降(p=0.038)。在进行连续减法任务时,OA 在两种环境下的步宽 DTC 均小于 YA(p=0.02)。
OA 在视流中行走时,步幅和步长在进行字母任务时得到改善。此外,两组之间的步宽 DTC 存在差异。视流中的感觉信息似乎对 OA 有益。字母任务更依赖于语言能力和词汇知识,而这些在衰老过程中是得到保留的。然而,YA 在进行双任务时使用复杂的言语风格,寻找复杂的单词并提高言语速度。
OA 可以通过在双任务行走中改善空间步态参数,特别是步宽,从而从视流中受益。