• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞芬太尼供应短缺对三级医院机械通气的影响:回顾性比较。

Impact of a remifentanil supply shortage on mechanical ventilation in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective comparison.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

RAIC Laboratory 13C1, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2018 Oct 26;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2198-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-018-2198-3
PMID:30367645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The continuous administration of opioids in critical care patients is a common therapy for the tolerance of mechanical ventilation. Opioid choice has a crucial impact on the length of mechanical ventilation. Owing to its very short context-sensitive half-life, remifentanil widens the available options for sedoanalgetic strategies. Supply disruption of such established intensive care medication has been reported to worsen clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated the influence of a nationwide supply shortage of remifentanil on mechanical ventilation and ventilation-associated outcomes at three perioperative intensive care units (ICUs) in a tertiary care hospital in Vienna. Two groups were followed: patients admitted to the ICU during the remifentanil shortage (July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016) and a control group one year after the remifentanil shortage (July 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017). Included patients were adults, received mechanical ventilation for at least 6 h, were admitted less than 90 days in the respective ICU, and survived their admission.

RESULTS

For comparison, Poisson count regression models and logistic regression models were computed. To compensate for multiple testing, the significance level was split (0.02 for the primary and 0.006 for secondary outcome parameters). Patients in the remifentanil shortage group received significantly longer mechanical ventilation (risk ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 2.14-2.24, P <0.001) with significantly prolonged ICU stay (P <0.001), days with non-invasive ventilation (P <0.001), and length of hospital stay (P <0.001). No significant difference was found in the occurrence of pneumonia (P = 0.040) and sepsis (P = 0.061). A greater proportion of patients in the shortage group underwent secondary tracheostomy (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The remifentanil shortage caused a significant impairment of essential outcome parameters in the ICU.

摘要

背景

在重症监护患者中持续给予阿片类药物是机械通气耐受的常见治疗方法。阿片类药物的选择对机械通气的时间长短有至关重要的影响。由于其非常短的上下文敏感半衰期,瑞芬太尼为镇静镇痛策略提供了更多选择。据报道,此类既定重症监护药物的供应中断会使临床结果恶化。

方法

本回顾性研究调查了维也纳一家三级护理医院的三个围手术期重症监护病房(ICU)中全国范围内瑞芬太尼供应短缺对机械通气和与通气相关的结果的影响。随访了两组患者:在瑞芬太尼短缺期间(2016 年 7 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日)入住 ICU 的患者和瑞芬太尼短缺一年后(2017 年 7 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日)入住 ICU 的对照组患者。纳入标准为成人、至少接受 6 小时机械通气、入住 ICU 时间不到 90 天且存活出院。

结果

为了进行比较,计算了泊松计数回归模型和逻辑回归模型。为了补偿多次检验,将显著性水平分割(主要结果参数为 0.02,次要结果参数为 0.006)。瑞芬太尼短缺组患者接受机械通气的时间明显延长(风险比 2.19,95%置信区间 2.14-2.24,P<0.001),ICU 入住时间(P<0.001)、无创通气天数(P<0.001)和住院时间(P<0.001)均延长。肺炎(P=0.040)和脓毒症(P=0.061)的发生率无显著差异。短缺组中接受二次气管切开术的患者比例显著更高(P<0.001)。

结论

瑞芬太尼短缺显著损害了 ICU 的重要结局参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/243d76585b67/13054_2018_2198_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/31b4374e81a4/13054_2018_2198_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/cd6bdd4e4b2e/13054_2018_2198_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/243d76585b67/13054_2018_2198_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/31b4374e81a4/13054_2018_2198_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/cd6bdd4e4b2e/13054_2018_2198_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ffa/6204001/243d76585b67/13054_2018_2198_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a remifentanil supply shortage on mechanical ventilation in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective comparison.瑞芬太尼供应短缺对三级医院机械通气的影响:回顾性比较。
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 26;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2198-3.
2
Influence of opioid choice on mechanical ventilation duration and ICU length of stay.阿片类药物选择对机械通气时间和 ICU 住院时间的影响。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jan;78(1):46-53. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
3
Could remifentanil reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in comparison with other opioids for mechanically ventilated patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.瑞芬太尼与其他阿片类药物相比,是否可缩短机械通气患者的机械通气时间?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2017 Aug 3;21(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1789-8.
4
Effect of acute kidney injury on weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.急性肾损伤对危重症患者机械通气撤机的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):184-91. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249828.81705.65.
5
Decreased duration of mechanical ventilation when comparing analgesia-based sedation using remifentanil with standard hypnotic-based sedation for up to 10 days in intensive care unit patients: a randomised trial [ISRCTN47583497].在重症监护病房患者中,比较瑞芬太尼镇痛镇静与标准催眠镇静长达10天的机械通气持续时间:一项随机试验[ISRCTN47583497]
Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):R200-10. doi: 10.1186/cc3495. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
6
Comparison between remifentanil and other opioids in adult critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较瑞芬太尼与其他阿片类药物在成年危重症患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 24;100(38):e27275. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027275.
7
Clinical Profile of Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and their Outcome in a Tertiary Care Medical ICU.三级医疗重症监护病房中需要长期机械通气患者的临床特征及其预后
J Assoc Physicians India. 2015 Oct;63(10):14-9.
8
Is tracheostomy a better choice than translaryngeal intubation for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days? A comparison of short-term outcomes.对于需要机械通气超过14天的重症患者,气管切开术比经喉插管是更好的选择吗?短期结果比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec 15;15:181. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0159-9.
9
[Ten-year evolution of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure in the hematogical patient admitted to the intensive care unit].[入住重症监护病房的血液病患者急性呼吸衰竭机械通气的十年演变]
Med Intensiva. 2013 Oct;37(7):452-60. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
10
Impact of a national propofol shortage on duration of mechanical ventilation at an academic medical center.全国范围内异丙酚短缺对学术医疗中心机械通气时间的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):406-11. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0af5.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Injectable Opioid Drug Shortage on Analgesia and Sedation Management in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.注射用阿片类药物短缺对医学重症监护病房镇痛和镇静管理的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):160-166. doi: 10.1177/0018578721999805. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Opioid analgesia alters corticospinal coupling along the descending pain system in healthy participants.阿片类镇痛会改变健康受试者沿下行疼痛系统的皮质脊髓耦合。
Elife. 2022 Apr 26;11:e74293. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74293.
3
Analgosedation: The Use of Fentanyl Compared to Hydromorphone.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between US Norepinephrine Shortage and Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock.美国去甲肾上腺素短缺与脓毒性休克患者死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1433-1442. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2841.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.
镇痛镇静:芬太尼与氢吗啡酮的使用比较
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2021 Aug 5;7(3):192-198. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2021-0026. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Reducing Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery - Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Critical Care Strategies.减少心脏手术患者的阿片类药物使用——术前、术中和重症监护策略
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jul;35(7):2155-2165. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.09.103. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Evolving targets for sedation during mechanical ventilation.机械通气镇静治疗的目标不断变化。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Feb;26(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000687.
6
Collaborative Management Strategies for Drug Shortages in Neurocritical Care.神经危重症药物短缺的协作管理策略。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Feb;32(1):226-237. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00730-7.
成人医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎的管理:美国感染病学会和美国胸科学会2016年临床实践指南
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
4
Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: the eCASH concept.舒适且以患者为中心的无过度镇静护理:eCASH理念。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):962-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4297-4. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
5
Impact of different sedation protocols and perioperative procedures on patients admitted to the intensive care unit after maxillofacial tumor surgery of the lower jaw: A retrospective study.不同镇静方案及围手术期操作对下颌骨颌面肿瘤手术后入住重症监护病房患者的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;44(4):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.12.018. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version.重症医学中谵妄、镇痛与镇静管理的循证及共识指南。2015年修订版(DAS指南2015)-简版
Ger Med Sci. 2015 Nov 12;13:Doc19. doi: 10.3205/000223. eCollection 2015.
7
Ventilator-Associated Events: Prevalence, Outcome, and Relationship With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.呼吸机相关性事件:患病率、结局及与呼吸机相关性肺炎的关系。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1798-806. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001091.
8
Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients.危重症患者早期与晚期气管切开术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 12;1(1):CD007271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007271.pub3.
9
Early versus late tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期与晚期气管切开术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):219-27. doi: 10.1177/0194599814561606. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
10
Risk factors for ventilator-associated events: a case-control multivariable analysis.呼吸机相关事件的危险因素:一项病例对照多变量分析。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1839-48. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000338.