John Kayla, Cape Kari, Goodman Lauren, Elefritz Jessica
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):160-166. doi: 10.1177/0018578721999805. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the injectable opioid drug shortage on analgesia and sedation management in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted of mechanically ventilated patients during the injectable opioid shortage. Outcomes were compared between a cohort of patients during the intravenous (IV) opioid shortage (01/01/18-03/31/18) and a control cohort (01/01/17-03/31/17). Total IV opioids and alternative sedative administration were assessed. Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) and Clinical Pain Observation Score (CPOT) assessments were also evaluated. The primary outcome was percentage of RASS within goal. Secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital/ICU length of stay, and mortality. One hundred patients were included (50 patients per cohort). In the shortage cohort, 23.2% fewer IV opioids were used (40 501.8 vs 52 713.8 oral morphine equivalents [OME]). No statistical differences were found in percentage of patients within goal RASS between the shortage and control (median 63.7% vs 74.8%; = .094) or CPOT (median 49.7% vs 47.7%; = .575). More patients received enteral opioids and propofol on day 1 in the shortage cohort when compared to the control (22% vs 4%; = .007 and 76% vs 56%; = .035) but there were no differences in benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine, or antipsychotic use. No differences in mechanical ventilation, hospital/ICU length of stay, or mortality were found. Use of less IV opioids during the injectable opioid shortage did not affect achievement of goal RASS and CPOT scores or increase prescribing of sedative medications such as benzodiazepines in the MICU.
本研究的目的是评估注射用阿片类药物短缺对医学重症监护病房(MICU)镇痛和镇静管理的影响。对注射用阿片类药物短缺期间接受机械通气的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。比较了静脉注射(IV)阿片类药物短缺期间(2018年1月1日至2018年3月31日)一组患者与对照队列(2017年1月1日至2017年3月31日)的结局。评估了静脉注射阿片类药物总量和替代镇静药物的使用情况。还评估了里士满躁动镇静评分(RASS)和临床疼痛观察评分(CPOT)。主要结局是达到目标的RASS百分比。次要结局包括机械通气时间、住院/ICU住院时间和死亡率。共纳入100例患者(每个队列50例患者)。在短缺队列中,静脉注射阿片类药物的使用量减少了23.2%(40501.8与52713.8口服吗啡当量[OME])。短缺组和对照组之间达到目标RASS的患者百分比(中位数63.7%对74.8%;P = 0.094)或CPOT(中位数49.7%对47.7%;P = 0.575)没有统计学差异。与对照组相比,短缺队列中更多患者在第1天接受了肠内阿片类药物和丙泊酚(22%对4%;P = 0.007和76%对56%;P = 0.035),但苯二氮䓬类药物、右美托咪定或抗精神病药物的使用没有差异。在机械通气、住院/ICU住院时间或死亡率方面没有发现差异。在注射用阿片类药物短缺期间减少静脉注射阿片类药物的使用并不影响MICU中目标RASS和CPOT评分的达成,也不会增加苯二氮䓬类等镇静药物的处方量。