Suppr超能文献

英国接受产前诊断的异常侵袭性胎盘的女性是否在接受最佳管理?一项关于计划分娩地点的观察性研究。

Are women antenatally diagnosed with abnormally invasive placenta receiving optimal management in England? An observational study of planned place of delivery.

机构信息

Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Mar;98(3):337-341. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13487. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the planned place of delivery for women antenatally diagnosed with abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) in England and identify how many units regard themselves to be "specialist centers" for the management of AIP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational study of obstetric-led units in England. An anonymous survey was sent to the delivery suite lead clinician in all 154 consultant-led units throughout England. The main outcome measures were whether each unit planned to manage AIP "in-house", the estimated number of AIP cases delivered in the previous 5 years and whether the unit considered itself a "specialist center" for AIP management.

RESULTS

In all, 114 of 154 units responded (74%): 80 (70%) manage AIP cases "in-house", 23 (29%) of these report that they regard themselves "specialist centers" for AIP. The 23 "specialist centers" managed significantly more cases than "non-specialist centers" (5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-7.3 vs 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.1 cases/unit/year; P < .001); nearly one-third of "non-specialist centers" manage less than 1 case per year. Extrapolating the reported number of cases to all 154 obstetrician-led delivery units produces an estimate of 5.2 cases per 10 000 births over the last 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Most units plan to manage AIP "in-house" despite encountering few cases each year. Centralizing care would allow the multidisciplinary team in each "specialist center" to develop significant experience in the management of this rare condition, leading to improved outcomes for the women.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在调查在英国被诊断为异常侵袭性胎盘(AIP)的女性产前计划分娩的地点,并确定有多少单位认为自己是 AIP 管理的“专科中心”。

材料和方法

对英格兰产科主导单位进行观察性研究。向英格兰所有 154 个顾问主导单位的分娩套房主管临床医生匿名发送了一份调查。主要观察指标是每个单位是否计划“内部”管理 AIP、过去 5 年中估计的 AIP 分娩病例数以及该单位是否认为自己是 AIP 管理的“专科中心”。

结果

共有 154 个单位中的 114 个单位做出了回应(74%):80 个(70%)单位管理 AIP 病例“内部”,其中 23 个(29%)单位报告称自己是 AIP 的“专科中心”。23 个“专科中心”管理的病例数明显多于“非专科中心”(5.4,95%置信区间(CI)为 4.3-7.3 与 2.3,95%CI 为 1.5-3.1 例/单位/年;P<.001);近三分之一的“非专科中心”每年管理不到 1 例。将报告的病例数外推至所有 154 个产科主导的分娩单位,估计过去 5 年每 10000 例活产中有 5.2 例。

结论

尽管每年遇到的病例很少,但大多数单位仍计划“内部”管理 AIP。集中护理将使每个“专科中心”的多学科团队在管理这种罕见疾病方面获得丰富的经验,从而改善女性的结局。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验