• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估新加坡青少年性犯罪者的保护因素:关于DASH - 13和SAPROF效用的初步证据

Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.

作者信息

Zeng Gerald, Chu Chi Meng, Lee Yirong

机构信息

Ministry of Social and Family Development, Singapore

Ministry of Social and Family Development, Singapore.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):91-108. doi: 10.1177/1079063214561684. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1177/1079063214561684
PMID:25527632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4441883/
Abstract

Sexual offending has attracted increasing public concern because of its long-term effects. Although there is an increasing amount of research on the risk factors for recidivism among youth who have sexually offended, there is a dearth of research on the protective factors for desistence from recidivism. The current study investigated the associations between protective factors and recidivism among 97 Singaporean youth who sexually offended (YSO). In addition, the predictive validity with regard to two new measures of protective factors-the Desistence for Adolescents Who Sexually Harm (DASH-13), and Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF)-were also evaluated. Results indicated that both the DASH-13 and the SAPROF were inversely related to the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR). However, neither the DASH-13 nor the SAPROF were found to have adequate predictive validity or incremental validity for sexual or nonsexual recidivism. The implications for the assessment and management of YSO are discussed.

摘要

性犯罪因其长期影响而日益引起公众关注。尽管针对有性犯罪行为的青少年再犯风险因素的研究越来越多,但对于阻止再犯的保护因素的研究却很匮乏。本研究调查了97名有性犯罪行为的新加坡青少年(YSO)中保护因素与再犯之间的关联。此外,还评估了两种新的保护因素测量方法——《性伤害青少年停止犯罪量表》(DASH - 13)和《暴力风险保护因素结构化评估量表》(SAPROF)的预测效度。结果表明,DASH - 13和SAPROF均与《青少年性犯罪再犯风险评估量表》(ERASOR)呈负相关。然而,对于性再犯或非性再犯,DASH - 13和SAPROF均未表现出足够的预测效度或增效效度。文中讨论了这些结果对有性犯罪行为青少年的评估和管理的启示。

相似文献

1
Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.评估新加坡青少年性犯罪者的保护因素:关于DASH - 13和SAPROF效用的初步证据
Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):91-108. doi: 10.1177/1079063214561684. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
2
Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.评估有性犯罪的青少年:ERASOR、J-SOAP-II 和 YLS/CMI 在非西方背景下的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Apr;24(2):153-74. doi: 10.1177/1079063211404250. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
3
Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.性犯罪少年被告中的保护因素与累犯情况
Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):71-90. doi: 10.1177/1079063214554958. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.性犯罪青少年再犯的风险和保护因素。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Aug;25(4):347-69. doi: 10.1177/1079063212459086. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.青少年性犯罪版暴力风险量表的有效性和可靠性。
Sex Abuse. 2020 Oct;32(7):826-849. doi: 10.1177/1079063219858064. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.对有性犯罪行为青少年再犯停止因素的前瞻性调查。
Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):127-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063214549260. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
7
Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.运用性侵犯风险评估框架(SAPROF)评估性暴力犯罪的保护因素。
Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):51-70. doi: 10.1177/1079063214550168. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
8
Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II: Research and Practice Implications.《青少年性犯罪者评估方案-II 的长期预测有效性:研究与实践意义》
Sex Abuse. 2020 Aug;32(5):499-520. doi: 10.1177/1079063219825871. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Validity of Risk Assessment Instruments Among Juveniles Who Sexually Offended: Victim Age Matters.性犯罪青少年风险评估工具的有效性:受害者年龄很重要。
Sex Abuse. 2021 Jun;33(4):379-405. doi: 10.1177/1079063220910719. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
10
Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).青少年性犯罪再犯风险估计(ERASOR)的前瞻性有效性。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Jun;24(3):203-23. doi: 10.1177/1079063211407080. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Compendium of Risk and Needs Tools for Assessing Male Youths At-Risk to and/or Who Have Engaged in Sexually Abusive Behaviors.一份用于评估有性虐待行为风险和/或已实施性虐待行为的男性青少年的风险与需求工具汇编。
Sex Offending. 2022 Nov 2;17:e8085. doi: 10.5964/sotrap.8085. eCollection 2022.
2
Promotive, Mixed, and Risk Effects of Individual Items Comprising the SAPROF Assessment Tool With Justice-Involved Youth.构成SAPROF评估工具的各个项目对涉及司法的青少年的促进、混合和风险影响。
Assessment. 2024 Mar;31(2):418-430. doi: 10.1177/10731911231163617. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
An Exploratory Study of Recidivism Risk Assessment Instruments for Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses in Singapore.新加坡性犯罪者累犯风险评估工具的探索性研究。
Sex Abuse. 2021 Mar;33(2):157-175. doi: 10.1177/1079063219884575. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
Violent and Nonviolent Youth Offenders: Preliminary Evidence on Group Subtypes.暴力与非暴力青少年罪犯:群体亚型的初步证据
Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2016 Jul;14(3):313-329. doi: 10.1177/1541204015615193. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing youth offenders in a non-Western context: The predictive validity of the YLS/CMI ratings.在非西方背景下评估青少年罪犯:《青少年服务/案件管理清单》(YLS/CMI)评分的预测效度。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):1013-21. doi: 10.1037/a0038670. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
2
A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration.性暴力犯罪的风险和保护因素的系统定性综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013 Apr;14(2):133-67. doi: 10.1177/1524838012470031. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
3
Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.性犯罪青少年再犯的风险和保护因素。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Aug;25(4):347-69. doi: 10.1177/1079063212459086. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
4
Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence.青少年暴力行为发展中的直接保护因素和缓冲保护因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S8-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.029.
5
Implications of direct protective factors for public health research and prevention strategies to reduce youth violence.直接保护因素对公共卫生研究和减少青年暴力预防策略的意义。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.019.
6
Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99.青少年性再犯预测:J-SOAP-II、ERASOR、J-SORRAT-II 和 Static-99 的荟萃分析
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Oct;36(5):423-38. doi: 10.1037/h0093938. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
7
Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).青少年性犯罪再犯风险估计(ERASOR)的前瞻性有效性。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Jun;24(3):203-23. doi: 10.1177/1079063211407080. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Assessing youth who sexually offended: the predictive validity of the ERASOR, J-SOAP-II, and YLS/CMI in a non-Western context.评估有性犯罪的青少年:ERASOR、J-SOAP-II 和 YLS/CMI 在非西方背景下的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2012 Apr;24(2):153-74. doi: 10.1177/1079063211404250. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
9
What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis.男性青少年性犯罪有何特别之处?通过元分析检验和解释。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):526-75. doi: 10.1037/a0019700.
10
Adolescent sexual offenders: the relationship between typology and recidivism.青少年性犯罪者:类型学与累犯的关系。
Sex Abuse. 2010 Jun;22(2):218-33. doi: 10.1177/1079063210369011.