Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Harris County Public and Environmental Services, Houston, Texas, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Oct;126(10):107003. doi: 10.1289/EHP2966.
Air pollution exposures are hypothesized to impact blood pressure, yet few longitudinal studies exist, their findings are inconsistent, and different adjustments have been made for potentially distinct confounding by calendar time and age.
We aimed to investigate the associations of long- and short-term [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] concentrations with systolic and diastolic blood pressures and incident hypertension while also accounting for potential confounding by age and time.
Between 2000 and 2012, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants were measured for systolic and diastolic blood pressure at five exams. We estimated annual average and daily [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] concentrations for 6,569 participants using spatiotemporal models and measurements, respectively. Associations of exposures with blood pressure corrected for medication were studied using mixed-effects models. Incident hypertension was examined with Cox regression. We adjusted all models for sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, smoking, physical activity, diet, season, and site. We compared associations from models adjusting for time-varying age with those that adjusted for both time-varying age and calendar time.
We observed decreases in pollution and blood pressures (adjusted for age and medication) over time. Strong, positive associations of long- and short-term exposures with blood pressure were found only in models with adjustment for time-varying age but not adjustment for both time-varying age and calendar time. For example, [Formula: see text] higher annual average [Formula: see text] concentrations were associated with 2.7 (95% CI: 1.5, 4.0) and [Formula: see text] (95% CI: [Formula: see text] 1.0) mmHg in systolic blood pressure with and without additional adjustment for time, respectively. Associations with incident hypertension were similarly weakened by additional adjustment for time. Sensitivity analyses indicated that air pollution did not likely cause the temporal trends in blood pressure.
In contrast to experimental evidence, we found no associations between long- or short-term exposures to air pollution and blood pressure after accounting for both time-varying age and calendar time. This research suggests that careful consideration of both age and time is needed in longitudinal studies with trending exposures. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2966.
空气污染暴露被认为会影响血压,但很少有纵向研究,其结果不一致,并且对潜在的因日历时间和年龄导致的不同混杂因素的调整也不同。
我们旨在研究长期和短期[Formula: see text]和[Formula: see text]浓度与收缩压和舒张压的关系,并在考虑年龄和时间潜在混杂因素的情况下,研究高血压的发病情况。
2000 年至 2012 年期间,多民族动脉粥样硬化研究参与者在五次检查中测量了收缩压和舒张压。我们使用时空模型和测量分别为 6569 名参与者估计了每年平均和每日[Formula: see text]和[Formula: see text]浓度。使用混合效应模型研究了暴露与药物矫正后的血压之间的关系。使用 Cox 回归检查了高血压的发病情况。我们在所有模型中调整了性别、种族/民族、社会经济地位、吸烟、体育活动、饮食、季节和地点。我们比较了仅调整随时间变化的年龄模型和同时调整随时间变化的年龄和日历时间模型的关联。
我们观察到随着时间的推移,污染和血压(根据年龄和药物进行调整)有所下降。仅在调整随时间变化的年龄的模型中,而不是同时调整随时间变化的年龄和日历时间的模型中,发现了长期和短期暴露与血压之间的强烈、正相关关系。例如,[Formula: see text]年平均[Formula: see text]浓度每增加[Formula: see text],收缩压分别增加 2.7(95%CI:1.5,4.0)和[Formula: see text](95%CI:[Formula: see text]1.0)mmHg。分别在没有和有时间的额外调整时。与高血压发病相关的关联也因额外的时间调整而减弱。敏感性分析表明,空气污染不太可能导致血压的时间趋势。
与实验证据相反,在同时考虑随时间变化的年龄和日历时间后,我们没有发现长期或短期暴露于空气污染与血压之间的关系。这项研究表明,在具有趋势暴露的纵向研究中,需要仔细考虑年龄和时间。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2966.